Home Blog Page 1765

E tū says pay Living Wage; minimum wage increase inadequate

3

E tū says a 50 cent increase in the minimum wage doesn’t go far enough and employers should commit to paying the Living Wage.

The government has announced the minimum wage will rise by 50 cents from $15.25 to $15.75, effective April 1.

Mat Danaher, E tū’s Living Wage Campaign Lead Organiser says today’s announcement comes hard on the heels of last week’s figures showing key New Zealand cities are among the most unaffordable in the world.

The 13th annual Demographia International Housing Affordability Survey, which compares housing prices to incomes in 406 metropolitan housing markets put Auckland near the top due to extremely expensive prices but modest pay packets.

Other centres including Wellington, Christchurch and Tauranga were also rated as “severely unaffordable”.

Mat says today’s announced increase will also be cold comfort for the many families still trying to pay for Christmas as well as facing back-to-school costs.

“Recent figures show costs going the wrong way for thousands of New Zealand households. School costs are surging with many families struggling to pay basic bills,” Mat says.

“While many will welcome the slight improvement to their finances offered by this increase, most minimum wage families will notice little difference to their circumstances.

“They need a Living Wage to help pay the bills and ensure a quality life for their families.”

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Back-to-school budget demands send parents into crisis – Child Poverty Action Group

1

Families still reeling from the expense of Christmas now face the high costs of the new school year along with rent increases and other rising costs of living.

Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) says family incomes must be high enough to cover all essential living and schooling costs for children, while ensuring that schools minimise fees and other charges to families.

With digital technology now part of the official curriculum, many schools have encouraged families to purchase computers for their children to use at school through a ‘bring your own device’ (BYOD) policy. Recently it has become normal for schools to include a device as part of the required ‘stationery pack’. But schools cannot by law charge for delivering the official curriculum, and already overstretched families face the dilemma of taking on significantly more debt to purchase such equipment, or seeing their children further disadvantaged compared with their peers.

A very basic device may cost several hundred dollars and over a thousand dollars for a higher quality one, plus any insurances that may be required. Time payments for such purchases may end up costing more in the long run through high interest rates. Many families turn to short-term loan providers to ensure their children are as adequately equipped as their peers, resulting in ongoing, increased weekly costs.

School uniforms and shoes are expenses that may become even less affordable as families living in private rentals suffer new year market-driven rent increases. Charities face growing demand as they become relied upon to meet the shortfall of ensuring that children living in poverty have the minimum equipment, clothing and nutrition they need to be ready to learn and enjoy school.

Work and Income is paying out far more supplementary or hardship grants showing the deficiency of benefit levels.

Meanwhile budgeting services are being squeezed as providers have experienced their own funding cuts over the past year. But they are needed more than ever, as family incomes are spread more thinly.

CPAG says Working for Families urgently needs reform to help solve this problem .

“There is a range of things that must be don, but paying the full package of tax credits to all low-income families irrespective of the number of hours of paid work they have each week is the first step.” says Associate Professor Susan St John, CPAG’s economics spokesperson.

“The Ministry of Education (MoE) and Education Review Office (ERO) also have a role to play,” says Professor John O’Neill, CPAG’s education spokesperson.

“MoE needs to advise Government on the funding levels that schools require to meet all the costs of curriculum delivery, including digital technology. ERO needs to ensure schools follow the law in terms of charging fees and requesting donations, and in being reasonable in their expectations of how much overstretched families will contribute to meeting the cost of a 21st century learning experience for children.

“Introducing digital technology into the curriculum is a good thing. Expecting schools to include these in a stationery pack and pushing families further into a spiral of debt is not.”

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Why Gareth Morgan is the only game in town when it comes to Political Tino Rangatiratanga for Maori

20

If Gareth Morgan throws the effort into standing in the Mt Albert by-election that he has into turning up at Ratana, the Greens and Labour are in trouble.

I have always argued one of the reasons why neoliberalism and extreme right wing madness has been allowed to go unchecked in NZ is because of our Unicameral Parliament.

We don’t appreciate or realise this, but NZ has one of the most powerful Parliament’s in the world.

Because we only have one chamber, all it takes to read any crazy idea an MP has into law is some urgency and around 10 hours worth of ‘debate’ and  bang, mad right wing policy can be imposed without so much as the barest of scrutinies.

This has happened throughout NZs Political History and that’s why our electoral term is only 3 years, the argument being, ‘you don’t want a Political Party in Government with this kind of legislative power for more than 3 years’.

If we want to move past the post-Treaty claim settlement phase, then we have to actively look at what real power sharing as defined by the kaupapa of the Treaty of Waitangi  looks like.

What does a functioning MMP Government in a Liberal Democracy look like if it was to be true to its Treaty obligations? What does political Tino Rangatiratanga look like structurally? And how would it work?

I think the answer is obvious, we need an Upper Chamber of Parliament that is split 50-50 between Pakeha representatives and Maori representatives. They could vote on law that impacted Treaty Obligations (there would be a process where Politicians would have to appeal to the Upper Chamber and argue how Treaty Obligations were impacted by legislation) and while the Upper Chamber couldn’t veto out right any law, they could have the power to send it back down to the lower chamber if they decided the concerns were not addressed.

Gareth Morgan shares this same vision. This idea to create an upper chamber is a radical departure and a powerful vision for where we need to move NZ if we are ever to be truly proud of Waitangi Day as our founding national day.

Having a rich white pakeha articulate such a radical advancement of true Maori Tino Rangatiratanga advances Morgan’s mana and it advances Pakeha mana.

Imagine a country that was mature enough to make symbolic and real the relationship the Treaty has promised since its signing. The day we can commit to such a vision is the day NZ stops being a country and matures enough to be a Nation.

Kudos to Gareth Morgan for actually bringing a vision of the future to Ratana and not just the empty talk of projects and work schemes that do nothing to extend real autonomy of Maori.

Manama Fox and Hone Harawira should go talk to him and skill up on this Upper House idea.

 

UPDATE: Marama Fox has reminded me on Twitter that the Maori Party have had the idea of a two chamber Parliament on their books for 12 years, and while that’s certainly true, it is hardly a policy the Maori Party have championed in that time. 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Dear Progressive NZ voters – in 2017 you can either have a changed Government or a change of Government – you can’t have both

12

I think there needs to be a very clear understanding about the 2017 election for progressive voters.

You can either have a change of Government or a changed Government – you can’t have both.

If the goal is to vote the National Party out of power, then it’s just a change of Government you are after.

If you want a changed Government that puts people before profits and has the courage to make the radical changes inequality, climate change and a dramatically changing labour force requires then you want a changed Government.

Here are your options NZ

OPTION 1: Labour + Greens = 51% – This is not going to happen.

OPTION 2: Labour + Greens + Maori Party/MANA Movement = 51% – This would be the most progressive policy platform possible, a changed Government.

OPTION 3: Labour + NZ First + supply and demand from Greens = 51% – This would be a change of Government with all the hollowness that phrase entails.

OPTION 4: National + NZ First = 51% – this would be the same Government but with extra spending for Winston’s pet projects.

As activists and people with a genuine concern in social justice we need to decide by the 2017 election which option is most likely and which option can be worked towards.

NOTE: I haven’t included TOP yet – if Gareth Morgan runs in Mt Albert by-election he has a chance to change everything, if he doesn’t run he won’t break 5% threshold in September. 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

TDB Summer Election Special: Understanding Maori Party + MANA movement in 2017

10

No one in the mainstream media has realised it yet, but the success of the Maori Party and MANA Movement in the 2017 election will decide the fate of the election and the idealogical direction of the country for the next 3 years.

The solidarity shown between the two parties at Ratana highlights the level of work being done behind the scenes to thrash out exactly how they should approach the election.

Working together and strategically gives them a chance to be an independent political voice for Maoridom, it gives NZers their only real chance of a progressive Government rather than the fairly hollow promise of a change of Government and through MMP it’s the only way Labour form the backbone of any new Government.

So there is a huge amount riding on the Maori Party and MANA Movement getting their shit together.

Here’s what they should do:

Hauraki-Waikato Last election combined MANA/MP candidate vote was 7600 to Nania’s 12 000 odd. With the Maori King pulling support for Labour however, Nania’s numbers could be severely challenged if MANA stood aside an electorate candidate in Hauraki-Waikato and let just a Maori Party Candidate stand while MANA stood in the Party vote.

Ikaroa-Rāwhiti – Combined MANA/MP candidate vote is 8800 to Meka Whaitiri’s 9 753. Here MANA again should step aside and allow Marama Fox a clear run.

Tāmaki Makaurau –  Combined MANA/MP candidate vote swamps that of Labour’s Peeni Henare. A strong candidate like Willie Jackson would win this for Maori Party if MANA candidate stepped aside.

Te Tai Tokerau – Here the Maori Party stand aside their electorate candidate AND allow Hone to stand.

Te Tai Hauāuru – Again combined Maori Party and MANA candidate vote beats Labour’s, same strategy to run Maori Party candidate.

Te Tai Tonga –  With Metiria running in this seat, there is a real chance that the right Maori Party candidate could win this by vote splitting between Metiria and Rino Tirikatene if the MANA candidate stood aside.

Waiariki – Just give this one to Te Ururoa, he rules that electorate with the largest victory margin of any of the Maori MPs.

Effectively MANA step aside their electorate candidate every electorate except Te Tai Tokerau but run a Party Vote campaign in the Maori electorates and General electorate’s to try and bring Annette Sykes in off MANA’s Party vote.

The Maori Party winning 6 seats and MANA Movement winning 1 would trigger all those weird and wonderful overhang+tail coating MMP quirks that would help see a progressive Government in power. It would mean Labour, if they got 30% Party Vote, would still get most of their maori MPs in off the party list and it would increase the number of Opposition votes.

Why would that be the best path to a progressive government?

Look at the options.

OPTION 1: Labour + Greens = 51% – This is not going to happen.

OPTION 2: Labour + Greens + Maori Party/MANA Movement = 51% – This would be the most progressive policy platform possible.

OPTION 3: Labour + NZ First + supply and demand from Greens = 51% – This would be a change of Government with all the hollowness that phrase entails. 

OPTION 4: National + NZ First = 51% – this would be the same Government but with extra spending for Winston’s pet projects.

The Maori Party and MANA Movement leadership have a lot to work on and it should be done already.

NOTE: I haven’t included TOP yet – if Gareth Morgan runs in Mt Albert by-election he has a chance to change everything, if he doesn’t run he won’t break 5% threshold in September.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Minimum wage goal should be $20 an hour to combat poverty and inequality – Unite Union

1
While welcoming an increase in the minimum wage by 50 cents an hour, Mike Treen of Unite Union says that this new level only maintains its value at about 50% of the average wage.
“This level was reached in 2008 and we need to be more ambitious as a society. We believe the goal should be $20 or two-thirds of the average wage
“The current consumer price index is almost meaningless when it come to what people have to spend in this country to live. After rent and power have been paid there is barely enough left for food and other necessities.
“There are widespread and unacceptable levels of poverty in this country and inequality is getting out of control. One way to address those issues in a meaningful way is to progressively increase the minimum wage in real terms.”
TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

The two factors that are pausing English’s hand on announcing election date

14

Bill English is an incredibly savvy and intelligent strategist and the Left should not underestimate him.

The Machiavellian smarts  to stay out of the Mt Albert by-election and allow Greens and Labour to be framed as fighting, the Machiavellian dog whistle to dump on Waitangi and his fluent use of Maori at Ratana yesterday all suggest a Politician who has relied on sly cunning over the retail charisma of Key to keep and hold power.

He’s pausing on announcing the election date because he want’s to think about two things

1 – Global ructions that hit the economy – the first sign of danger Internationally and he might want to go to the Polls sooner rather than later and allow the damage to set in.

2 – Mt Albert by-election – If Labour can be wounded or worse then Bill might want to call a snap election.

If the Left underestimate English, National get another term.

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

The Machiavellian horror of Trump’s ‘American carnage’

9

Historians will look at Trump’s blistering venom of a speech as a turning point in history. The naked rage of perceived lost privilege mixed with neoliberal economic dislocation has given Trump a platform to spin his violent fantasy of America

“But for too many of our citizens, a different reality exists: mothers and children trapped in poverty in our inner cities; rusted out factories scattered like tombstones across the landscape of our nation; an education system flush with cash, but which leaves our young and beautiful students deprived of all knowledge; and the crime and the gangs and the drugs that have stolen too many lives and robbed our country of so much unrealized potential.

This American carnage stops right here and stops right now.”

…This American carnage.

This.

American.

Carnage.

Liberals. Elites, Academics, Women, Politicians, Celebrities, Men, Activists, LGBTQ communities, white, black, Asian, migrant, hispanic, teenagers, children and most pets – pretty much most sentient life – has been quick to denounce this apocalyptic political vision.

It is as horrific as it is Machiavellian genius.

For those who have seen their jobs and factories shipped offshore, for those who don’t have the educational opportunities to skill up, for those who compete for work with cheaper migrant labour, for those who have suffered from drugs and crime that breed in this economic wasteland, for those who have to join the Military because there is no other opportunities – FOR THEM, this has been an American Carnage.

He is speaking to the 30% of America that he needs to keep. He will strip billions from the Military Industrial Complex and drop it into infrastructure and building throughout the rust belt that he needs if he is to get a second term.

Trump’s spitting in the face of the establishment while they were all forced to sit there and listen to him tells us that he has no intention of changing his style and the cavalcade of mutant political freaks he’s appointed to his Cabinet tells us that he has every chance of becoming a dangerously destabilising threat to the planet.

This speech was to his devotees and it was a direct threat to the Republican Party itself that if they don’t let him do what he wants, he’ll blame them and hurt them at the Mid-Term elections in 2 years time.

 

 

 

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Political Caption Competition

4

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Daily Blog Guerrilla Radio – Gil Scott Heron – The Revolution Will Not Be Televised

0

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

TDB Top 5 International Stories: Tuesday 24th January 2017

0

5: In Photos: New Zealand Women the First in the World to March Against Trump

This is just the beginning, say organisers.

New Zealand was the first country in the world to launch the historic Women’s March protesting Trump’s inauguration as President of the United States. Now organisers say it’s time to regroup and confront the country’s own legacy of gender violence and inequality.

Vice News

 

4: Trump withdraws US from Trans-Pacific Partnership deal

US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order formally withdrawing the US from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal, following through on a promise from his presidential campaign.

“We’ve been talking about this for a long time,” Trump said as he signed the executive order in an Oval Office ceremony on Monday, calling his move a “great thing for the American worker”.

In the same ceremony, Trump also signed an order imposing a federal hiring freeze, with the exception of the military, and a directive banning US non-governmental organisations receive federal funding from providing abortions abroad.

Aljazeera

 

3: ‘Your only right is to obey’: lawyer describes torture in China’s secret jails

On day one of his detention Xie Yang claims he was shackled to a metal chair and ordered to explain why he had joined an illegal anti-Communist party network.

On day two he was moved to a secret prison and informed: “Your only right is to obey.”
Finally, on day three, the violence began.

“We’ll torture you to death just like an ant,” one inquisitor allegedly warned the Chinese human rights lawyer during a punishing marathon of interrogation sessions and beatings designed make him confess to crimes he denies.
“I’m going to torment you until you go insane,” another captor allegedly bragged. “Don’t even imagine that you’ll be able to walk out of here and continue being a lawyer. You’re going to be a cripple.”

The Guardian 

2: Women’s March on Washington: Historic Protest Three Times Larger Than Trump’s Inaugural Crowd

In one of the largest days of protest in U.S. history, millions took to the streets Saturday one day after the inauguration of Donald Trump. The largest protest was the Women’s March on Washington, where more than 500,000 packed the streets. According to crowd scientists at Manchester Metropolitan University in Britain, the crowd was roughly three times the size of the audience at President Trump’s inauguration a day earlier. Women-led marches took place in over 600 locations spread across seven continents—including Antarctica. In addition to Washington, massive protests took place in Boston; Chicago; Denver; Los Angeles; Madison, Wisconsin; New York; Oakland; Portland, Oregon; St. Paul; San Francisco and Seattle. According to one count, as many as 4.6 million people took part in the global day of action.

Democracy Now!

1:  LAWMAKERS IN EIGHT STATES HAVE PROPOSED LAWS CRIMINALIZING PEACEFUL PROTEST

OVER THE WEEKEND, millions of demonstrators took to streets across the country to mobilize against the new president and his agenda, assembling in a national turnout that organizers call the beginning of a reinvigorated protest movement. But in states home to dozens of Saturday’s demonstrations, Republican lawmakers are moving to criminalize and increase penalties on peaceful protesting.

Last week, I reported that such efforts were afoot in five states: In Minnesota, Washington state, Michigan, and Iowa, Republican lawmakers have proposed an array of anti-protesting laws that center on stiffening penalties for demonstrators who block traffic; in North Dakota, conservatives are even pushing a bill that would allow motorists to run over and kill protesters so long as the collision was accidental. Similarly, Republicans in Indiana last week prompted uproar over a proposed law that would instruct police to use “any means necessary” to clear protesters off of a roadway.

Over the weekend, readers alerted me to two additional anti-protesting bills, both introduced by Republicans, that are pending in Virginia and Colorado. This brings the number of states that have in recent weeks floated such proposals to at least eight.

The Intercept

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

The Daily Blog Open Mic – Tuesday 24th January 2017

2

openmike

 

Announce protest actions, general chit chat or give your opinion on issues we haven’t covered for the day.

Moderation rules are more lenient for this section, but try and play nicely.

 

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Bill English’s Plan B for TPPA a political ‘own goal’ in election year – Professor Jane Kelsey

11

The idea from Prime Minister Bill English that New Zealand and other countries might proceed with Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement without the US is quite bizarre – especially in an election year’, says Professor Jane Kelsey from the University of Auckland.

‘Donald Trump would be delighted! US corporations would get the benefit of all the controversial rules on medicine patents, copyright, investment, state-owned enterprises that the US insisted on without the US have to give a single thing in return. Worse, countries that resisted these unprecedented demands for several years would become their new champions.’

‘Bill English suggested this morning that the TPPA was “probably” still a good deal without the US. Seriously? The economic modelling the government relied on to sell the TPPA last year had zero credibility and failed to account for the costs. Take the US out of that equation and any attempt to pitch the agreement as having net benefits to New Zealand is risible.’

‘Trying to sell the unsaleable during an election year would be a major political miscalculation’, Professor Kelsey said. ‘Because the text would be substantively different from the one that National rammed through the New Zealand Parliament last year the new version and a new National Interest Analysis would have to be tabled in the House and referred to the select committee. Not allowing submissions would inflame anti-TPPA sentiments; allowing them would provide a platform to expose the government’s stupidity’.

Kelsey noted that ‘Labour would also have to engage the TPPA in election year, which it is desperate not to do. Winston Peters would be in his element.’

This scenario assumes the other countries can reach the threshold of 85% of GDP to bring the agreement into force. That calculation would apply to the eleven original signatories who remain after the US withdraws its signature later this week.

According to Professor Kelsey, a TPPA-11 would require ratification by Japan, Canada and Australia, as well as either Mexico (86.6% of GDP) or four of the other larger countries (Malaysia, Singapore, Chile and either Peru or New Zealand) which total just over 85%.

‘Japan has completed its ratification. But the Australian Senate looks like it may reject the deal. The Canadian government has held a prolonged consultation on TPPA while awaiting developments in the US and will now be preoccupied with threats to renegotiate NAFTA.’

Professor Kelsey advised the Prime Minister to think again on whether he really wants to score such an obvious ‘own goal’ in an election year.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Day of Endangered Lawyer on 24 January – New Zealand Law Society

0

New Zealand Law Society President Kathryn Beck has praised the courage of lawyers around the world who risk harassment, imprisonment or even death to stand up for the rights of their clients.

Lawyers’ organisations and lawyers internationally are recognising 24 January as the Day of the Endangered Lawyer.

“Each year a disturbingly high number of lawyers are threatened, beaten, incarcerated or murdered because they represent unpopular clients or speak out against human rights abuses. Their brave and courageous actions are something for all lawyers to salute,” Ms Beck says.

“New Zealanders are very fortunate that they live in a country where the rule of law is respected and adhered to. We take it for granted that we can be critical of our institutions, our justice system, our government and to seek to change the way things are done without fear of physical harm or unlawful imprisonment.

“We have a right to legal representation and we know that a lawyer may represent any client as a matter of course, whatever they are alleged to have done, or whatever they believe. It is important, therefore, that as a profession we give our support to lawyers in other countries where that is not so.”

Ms Beck says this year’s Day of Endangered Lawyer is the seventh such commemoration. The focus in 2017 is on China. There have been many reports of harassment and imprisonment of Chinese human rights lawyers.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Protestors block second gate at Fonterra dairy factory – Coal Action Group

1

Protestors block second gate at Fonterra dairy factory

Climate change protestors have now blocked a second gate at Fonterra’s Clandeboye dairy factory in South Canterbury this morning, in protest at the company’s coal use.

This follows the chaining of five people to the main coal delivery gate earlier today.

Charlie Montague, a health student from Dunedin, has now chained herself to a second gate at the factory, which is now locked, and has been turned off by Fonterra. Trucks have been turning around at the gate.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

STAY CONNECTED

11,996FansLike
4,057FollowersFollow

Foreign policy + Intel + Security

Subscribe | Follow | Bookmark
and join Buchanan & Manning LIVE Thursdays @ midday

MIL Public Webcast Service