Similar Posts

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 Comments

  1. I’m a Paediatrician and Economist, and I’ve run large child protection services in Australia, but worked clinically in the area in NZ

    The name of Child Protection agencies is fraught, as is the structure. NZ has gotten somewhat better with the introduction of the Children’s Monitor.

    The work they do is complex. Staff are underappreciated and underpaid, and NZ already struggles with a relative undersupply of registered social workers. Many like to think it’s a job I’ve does through life experience: it really is so much more than that. Forensic and Mental Health trained SWs as well as generalist SWs are critical to the proper functioning of these agencies. Unfortunately their voice is marginalized in MCOT.

    What is different in the current term, is the way in which children have been criticised. Although this often occurs, for instance JA’s passion for improving child poverty contrasted with the relative lack of delivery. We’ve had the “bootcamps”, which the coalition themselves couldn’t get their messaging consistent on, but s7AA which seemed unnecessary but to be fair was also bungled by Kelvin Davis.

    You may not be following, but one thing I was surprised hasn’t been call out is Minister Chhour acknowledged that despite receiving no briefings on it, she made comments asserting the GnRHa (Puberty Blocker) Ban was a good thing, not clarifying whether it was as children’s minister or NZF Party member.

    I try write from either a non-partisan or bipartisan perspective, because to be honest, almost all parties in NZ disappoint me. One area I find consistently disappointing is the lack of appreciation that much of the modern child protection infrastructure in NZ, has its origins in the 19/20th century eugenics movement: the idea that “brown people would probably be okay if their brownies, language and culture, could just be removed so that children would be better off”.

    To be clear, that isn’t my view. I disagree with those who claimed getting rid of s7AA was decolonisation. I think it’s too gentle. Getting rid of s7AA was a bunch of Ministers communicating to the country that they are okay with a return to a time when “undesirable” traits were managed by breeding them out of people, removing children from their homes, sending parents away or “converting” their cultural practices and beliefs. And although it’s received virtually no attention, this was led by a Libertarian party whose ideology ostensibly opposes such drastic interference with personal and community autonomy.

    SNS if that was a bit ranty. Long time listener, first time caller (except literally once when you were on Channel Z!).

  2. While we are on the subject of our vulnerable Tamariki Bryan Bruce has written to the PM in vain.

    “Try to imagine what 33,000 New Zealand children looks like.

    Now think of the reality of a recent report that every one of those children – our nation’s children- are homeless.

    You can find that report here:

    https://www.coalitiontoendwomenshomelessness.org/waka-huia/research-release-children-and-young-people-experiencing-homelessness

    Once you have read it could you explain to me how, as a nation ,we are “back on track” as you touted at the last election.

    I also need you to explain to me again how allowing our country’s richest people to get away with paying an effective tax rate of just 8.9% tax on their economic income is making the lives of the many who are living on Struggle Street so much better.

    https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/ird-report-shows-wealthy-nzers-pay-much-lower-tax-rates-other-earners

    Because, as I look around me, I see foodbanks struggling to meet an ever-growing demand while Trading Banks (largely overseas owned) announce record profits, and charities having to find shoes ,clothing and even warm pyjamas for kids .

    I see foreign mining companies given permission to tunnel for gold under native forests and your coalition government changing the law rather than let the courts decide who, among us, is responsible for polluting our planet and bringing them to account.

    This is not the New Zealand I want for our children and their children.

    I want us to leave future generations a legacy not a liability.

    We are on the wrong track Prime Minister.