Waatea News Column: Māori Party Tax Policy demands attention
First published on Waatea News.

First published on Waatea News.


🗳️🔥 TE KAUPAPA ELECTION ’26 — THE BIG ISSUES, NO DUCKING THE QUESTIONS This weekend on Te Kaupapa Election ’26,…

Sharp rise in incidents of AI escaping users’ control, research finds Exclusive: Number of times AI lies, ignores instructions and…
Bond markets are roiling… ‘There’s no plan’: as instability in global bond markets rises, what are the knock-on effects? When…

RNZ political donations tracker: ACT has now raised more from large donations than it got in 2023 RNZ is tracking…

Russia ‘losing 6,000 more troops in Ukraine each month than it can recruit’ The Guardian – Advertisement – I’m…

POLITICAL FACT OF THE DAY: George Washington spent his entire campaign budget on 160 gallons of liquor for voters. POLITICAL…
Agree their tax policy is reasonable but it comes with a big dose of Maori sovereignty so unlikely to appeal to too many
With all due respect, they only need to appeal to 16% of the population. ACT policy is geared to the top 1% of the population and will drag as many others into the fold as they can. TPM are no different.
As for your claims of sovereignty, TPM want the treaty to be recognized, and the for the words on the treaty to be honoured, which is not sovereignty.
Keep spending 1 million dollars on Kainga ora housing that doesn’t last more than 3 years! Plenty more money available, to tax others to pay for it! (I wonder why people are leaving NZ?)
Auckland flooding: Several Kāinga Ora houses lifted off their foundations
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2023/01/auckland-flooding-several-k-inga-ora-houses-lifted-off-their-foundations.html
“When they moved in Maria said she was told it was a million-dollar home.
She and her mother are wondering why their three-year-old home was so badly damaged in the floods.”
Or perhaps those that have donated millions to Nationaland ACT could put that money to better use and support quality housing for those in desperate need. I thought not.
To take GST OFF certain items destroys the simplicity of the current system and there would be little benefit as the 15 percent gain will be lost in administration. All it would do is pay for more public servants in an already bloated market.
Wait for it, wait for it…