Waatea News Column: Māori Party Tax Policy demands attention
First published on Waatea News.

First published on Waatea News.


Here we go! Blue on Silver unfriendly fire! Winston lobs the first shot… – Advertisement – Winston Peters lashes ‘egotistical’,…

Shane Jones has managed to take a principled position against free trade deals and made it a shitty attack campaign…

Bill giving police new powers needs stricter limits, Privacy Commissioner says The Privacy Commissioner says a bill empowering police to…

Last election voters were bitter post-covid and turned on Jacinda for having the temerity to save 20 000 lives. These…

CTU welcomes Tax Justice Aotearoa policy statement The New Zealand Council of Trade Unions Te Kauae Kaimahi has welcomed today’s…

‘A storm every eight days’ – country’s biggest insurer calls for systemic response A storm hit New Zealand every eight…
Agree their tax policy is reasonable but it comes with a big dose of Maori sovereignty so unlikely to appeal to too many
With all due respect, they only need to appeal to 16% of the population. ACT policy is geared to the top 1% of the population and will drag as many others into the fold as they can. TPM are no different.
As for your claims of sovereignty, TPM want the treaty to be recognized, and the for the words on the treaty to be honoured, which is not sovereignty.
Keep spending 1 million dollars on Kainga ora housing that doesn’t last more than 3 years! Plenty more money available, to tax others to pay for it! (I wonder why people are leaving NZ?)
Auckland flooding: Several Kāinga Ora houses lifted off their foundations
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2023/01/auckland-flooding-several-k-inga-ora-houses-lifted-off-their-foundations.html
“When they moved in Maria said she was told it was a million-dollar home.
She and her mother are wondering why their three-year-old home was so badly damaged in the floods.”
Or perhaps those that have donated millions to Nationaland ACT could put that money to better use and support quality housing for those in desperate need. I thought not.
To take GST OFF certain items destroys the simplicity of the current system and there would be little benefit as the 15 percent gain will be lost in administration. All it would do is pay for more public servants in an already bloated market.
Wait for it, wait for it…