Similar Posts

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

5 Comments

  1. Anni O’Brian goes on tour in support of Branton Tarrant’s right to free speech.

    “This morning the police advised Mr Tamakli that his firearms license had been revoked, and took his guns – not because he has been charged with an offence, but because of what he said,” says Free Speech Union Council Member Douglas Brown.

    Maybe if the police had taken Branton Tarrant’s guns because of what he had said on line, a tragedy could have been averted.

    From ‘THE CONVERSATION’ Academic rigour, journalistic flair:
    Christchurch terrorist discussed attacks online a year before carrying them out, new research reveals
    Published: February 21, 2024
    https://theconversation.com/christchurch-terrorist-discussed-attacks-online-a-year-before-carrying-them-out-new-research-reveals-223955

    ….In March and August 2018, up to a year before he attacked two Christchurch mosques, Brenton Tarrant posted publicly online that he planned to do so. Until now, these statements have not been identified……
    ……What we found overturns a great deal of what we thought we knew about him. It also raises serious questions, not only about why this posting was not detected before the attack, but also why it has not been discovered in the five years since the March 15 attacks……
    …..Among other revelations, we show that there were numerous opportunities for the public and New Zealand and Australian security services to observe him making very threatening statements online.
    …….In these threads, Tarrant and other users posted angrily about the spread of immigrants in New Zealand, and particularly the presence of mosques in small towns. Very soon, a group of anonymous posters, including Tarrant, discussed violence against the buildings (and the communities that gather in them).
    When another user posted an image of a box of matches in reference to the mosques, Tarrant wrote “Soon”*.

    *(my emphasis P@)

    Not too different to Brtian Tamaki calling on his supporters to burn down mosques, this and other violent hate speech being defended by Little Fascist Anni.

    That’s right. I am exercising my right to free speech, by calling out Anni O’Brian as a ‘Fascist’, I invite free speech advocate Little Fascist Anni to sue me for defamation.

    From RNZ:
    Ethnic communities condemn Brian Tamaki’s inflammatory video
    RNZ IndoNZ reporters
    19 June 2026
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/indonz_featured/601666/ethnic-communities-condemn-brian-tamaki-s-inflammatory-video

    …”Let’s purge New Zealand of Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims,” Tamaki said.
    “And, while we’re at it, if they’re burning churches down, why don’t we burn mosques and their temples down? Tit for tat.”

  2. I don’t believe O’Brien is worth protesting about. She is an absolute insignificant “nobody”. For someone of her low brain capacity to criticise the likes of Grant Robertson is hillarious. His intellect is so superior to hers, it’s ridiculous. So let’s pretend her away Right now and let her sink into the huge hole that awaits her and many others? She’s simply another ME ME ME person.

  3. Martyn, this post does no credit to this blog, it just reinforces the impression that the contemporary left is hostile to free speech. The list of speakers is: Duncan Garner, Rob Campbell, Todd Stephenson, Simon O’Connor, Liam Hehir, John Glover, Davina Smoulders, and an as-yet unspecified Ngāi Tahu Representative.

    1. I think people know that the left are pro free speech but anti this woman and the other vile people who run the free speech union. The very fact that they have on their board various Zionists says a great deal they are never ever going to deal with anything that might upset those people.

  4. If you’re prepared to pay actual money to listen to these clowns faking sincerity, you probably shouldn’t be allowed out in public without adult supervision. Ani O’Brien wouldn’t know ‘good faith’ if it crapped on her lawn.