Similar Posts

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 Comments

  1. Just spent 5 minutes having a chat with AI on this question. It appears to be a good idea and have good outcomes in the long run but….

    It’s impact on the property market will be sufficiently negative that it will put everyone who owns a house against everyone that doesn’t, assuming people don’t vote against their economic interests.

    It will blow up our banking model and likely impact our currency. Getting a transition right is key and you’ve seen how NACT FIRST undid everything significant that Labour did in 3 years. Unless the left could hold power for 3 terms it would be very difficult to make this stick politically and vested interests would likely engineer a crash to ensure the status quo resumed.

    Policy settings and political dynamics favour the status quo and make massively consequential reforms like this under MMP very difficult to implement. Change the political system first.

  2. In addition the state should take control of all money creation. Take away the license of banks to create the fiat money the state must back. Use our sovereign money created to lend to private banks at interest for them to on lend at greater interest but not for asset buying. The state would have one bank that held all money and was a public service for all citizens for transaction. (The IMF Chicago Plan)