Ending Fees Free Punishes Young New Zealanders

Rolling back fees-free tertiary education isnβt just another Budget cut. Itβs part of a decades-long transfer of wealth and opportunity away from younger generations and towards an older property-owning class that already dominates housing, politics and capital.
We on the Left have allowed Identity Politics to become such a dominant narrative that there is no oxygen or language available to critique what the fuck is going on from a class perspective.
Other than being little more than performance art for the perpetually woke, middle class Identity Politics robs us of understanding political events like the appalling decision to roll back fees-free student loans from a class perspective because all the Left are good for these days is free the nipple protests for militant vegan mummy bloggers.
Which is fine and dandy, but not so good at challenging the neoliberal hegemonic economic structure.
The class war nobody on the Left wants to talk about
Here’s how the Right sell it…
Fees-free university scheme ‘didn’t achieve any goals’, Christopher Luxon says
RNZ
…what a load of utter, utter, utter bullshit.
The goal was to reduce student debt!
Since Gen X, every generation has been blighted by user pays debt, meaning the propertied boomer class have laughed all the way to the bank.
We don’t have a youth problem in NZ, we have an adult problem in that we hate youth.
Bernard Hickey makes the case…
A political economy that enriches the old and punishes the young
New Zealandβs political economy has become such a housing-market-with-bits-tacked-on that it has spiralled into a self-reinforcing system, where the ever-older-and-ever-wealthier winners keep rewarding politicians that protect and enhance their gains, especially when it is at the expense of the young losers paying the rents and taxes in this system.
The losers then either give up voting or leave the country, reinforcing the political power of the winners and ensuring the system can stagger on.
After all, who will pay the rent to keep the system going if the young are allowed to buy their own homes after paying off their fees early?
It has led to (often unpromised) policies such as ending fees-free for students and the dumping matching Government grants for first home buyers. The political energy generating this spiral is encapsulated in support for NZ First, which has reinforced and bolstered the incomes and tax-free capital gains of older home owners for decades.
That support is rising, thanks to a turbocharging of anti-migrant views among older home-owners. Todayβs news from our political economy encapsulates the latest twist of the spiral, including:
- Winston Peters boasting on Friday the Government will dump the final first year of fees-free tertiary education in the Budget later this month, adding to its ending of first home buyer subsidy grants as unpromised budget cuts hitting young voters hardest;
- A βpoll of pollsβ analysing the trend of support for the coalition of parties in Government parties vs the Opposition parties shows the Government is on track to win re-election, thanks to a surge in support for NZ First;
- A survey of 506 young New Zealanders for OneChoice has found 54% now define the βNew Zealand dreamβ as being financially independent, ahead of home-ownership (44%), while 65% say hoping to own a home is no longer relevant;
- The survey found 33% of renters spend at least half their income on rent, with a further 38% spending between 30% and 49% of their income on rent, while 71% are delaying starting a family and/or changing careers due to housing pressures, and 76% feel βtrappedβ as renters being unable to save for a deposit; and,
- Police Commissioner Richard Chambers has conceded to 1News he canβt compete with the salaries and incentives being offered by Australian police forces, with at least 144 officers leaving for Australia in the past year.
…the neoliberal experiment has locked generations out of wealth creation and reduced them to a precarious gig environment as AI carves out middle-class professions with devastating ease.
Old Zealand versus New Zealand
Every generation after the Boomers have been penalised and universal free services funded by taxing wealth are the only inoculation.
This election is Old Zealand versus New Zealand.
It’s the propertied class vs the rest of us.
The true demarcation in a liberal-progressive-late-stage-capitalism-democracy is the 1% richest (plus their 9% enablers) vs the 90% rest of us and once you see politics through that lens, the Left can never lose an election again.







FOR YOUR INFO:
Superannuitants were not irresponsible bludgers:
“NZ workers in the 1960’s paid a dedicated ‘social security tax’ on their earnings to fund the superannuation system. This was not a personal savings account but a pay-as-you-go system.” “The Social Security Act of 1938 introduced a dedicated social security tax [a charge on income] to pay for superannuation and other benefits. This specific tax was gradually phased out and merged into general taxation. In 1977 the current system of universal National Superannuation, funded from general tax revenue, rather than a dedicated pension tax, was firmly established. Since then, the pension has been funded directly from general tax revenue, not a specific ‘retirement contribution’ from employees. While the NZ Super Fund was established in 2001, it is a savings vehicle for future costs rather than a direct tax on workers’ paychecks”.
That’s a long way of saying that the destruction of New Zealand’s economy happened under current superannuates.
Does that mean they’re exclusively to blame? No, not at all. We are all responsible if we don’t make plans to destroy neoliberalism and hold those responsible for it personally accountable. Luxon and Seymour and Peters can join Thiel in having the money they stole rattled out of their pockets.
What in hell is happening with this totally MAD CoC? Luxon et al intend to kneecap fee free student loans thus punishing the young yet again. And again the winners will be the greedy, grasping property boomers! All this while he has announced $70m for the Robbie Williams’ tour and two English soccer teams owned by millionaires, who can all afford to pay their own way!!!! How does Luxon justify this? He gives with one hand and takes with the other. He is a complete and utter MISFIT as a PM. We must get our priorities right! We can’t continue with this insane, knee-jerking lot. They must go NOW!
I’m afraid the latest poll shows theCoC is going nowhere except forward to another 3 years in power. The voters know who they need in power to get through the hard times
In your wet dreams Trev the Pomme. Which poll are you looking at hard right wing NZ Herald owners Poll of Polls?
Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!
Even the fuck wit right wing Tax payer union poll that came out today( it is the latest poll) has it even, so where the fuck you derive your opinion from no one knows. You probably believe in Jesus too.
Before the inevitable parade of mouth breathers arrive to parrot the rights talking points about how it was “wasteful”.
Any funding not allocated goes back into the pot.
Willis and others want you to believe that somehow it just disappears. Poof! Gone in a cloud of smoke.
Trev and Bob believe this sort of obvious lie as they’re credulous children.
You’re not wrong.
The need to fund New Zealand Superannuation is going to take up any money the government can find, so they’re cutting back everywhere else.
Unfortunately, under MMP no one can or will change this.
Superannuation is not funded by taxation.
Its time you right wingers woke up and investigated how taxation works.
Also how govt actually is funded.
Here are 4 video’s to watch and Richard has many more to educate yourself.
https://youtu.be/UXiE_rRiUyQ?si=WROYlZQ0ZgsdkYEJ
https://youtu.be/IecTUfYQEWE?si=tUehHkVDoEAQ0ulp
https://youtu.be/FlqoKplKNz4?si=5kFUwo9TzogOuZk8
https://youtu.be/CupapOCZt_8?si=4PmWwwl6uYGPJrOs
National as opposed to Labour are happy to go to the people with a policy of moving the retirement age to 67 .This is the same as Australia and UK . Asset testing achieves little as the cost outweighs the benefit .
When questioned Chris Hipkins would not endorse the fees free scheme or declare it would be reinstated .it has not helped the poor and benefitted those that could afford the fees.Some of themoney is going to help those in the trades.