Similar Posts

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

8 Comments

  1. The class war being imposed on our communities.

    ” The Government is engaged in a war against the poor, pandering to prejudices that they are living the high life on a benefit that barely allows subsistence living ”

    THE GOVERNMENT’S sanctions regime, its harassment of the homeless, and its partnership with the most punitive instincts of the Act Party amount to something far more deliberate than a collection of harsh policies. They form a coherent political project: a war on the poor. It is a war of bureaucratic cruelty, public shaming, and the calculated withdrawal of social rights. And like all such wars, it is justified by a narrative that paints the victims as the problem.

    https://nzagainstthecurrent.blogspot.com/2026/07/the-governments-war-oin-poor.html

  2. ” Our Children deserve better food than what they feed prisoners in NZ! ”

    No they don’t

    Our non entitled children are prisoners of this plutocracy and Seymour despises the fact that his government should be in any way responsible for providing even corporate slop for our poorest exploited people that his party and his government are along with the NZLP are responsible for supporting harsh corporate neoliberal policies that have created this crisis in the first place.

    If there was any justice Seymour should be incarcerated along with his donors and political colleagues for economic crimes against New Zealanders.

  3. Seymour’s tactic is to undermine and discredit the school lunch programme until it is so unpopular and despised that he will have a good excuse to wipe it completely – which has always been his aim.

    1. I’m with you there, Mike the Lefty.
      Same tactic being used with the public health system. And education I’d say, more long term.
      They don’t seem to understand, that we, understand.

  4. My grandson is attending ST PAULS in Hamilton next year as a day student .His father has to pay $3000 for lunches .No he is not getting 1000 meals more like 200 ,so they are way more than $3 .And ,no, he is not allowed to pack marmite sandwiches from home .

  5. You’d think Seymour was intentionally trying to self sabotage the lunch programme or just show off his ministerial incompetence? Maybe both.

    1. Wee Davey doesn’t believe the school lunch program should exist at all, but if it absolutely has to exist to keep the peasantry from revolting, then it should be done on the smell of an oily rag… and taste like it. By that metric, his efforts have been a roaring success. Perhaps he should market the entire dismal fiasco as a weight-loss program instead. “Are you getting a bit tubby? Lacking self-control? Snacking at all hours? Then take a look at these culinary abominations! One spoonful of this reconstituted muck, and you’ll sew your own mouth shut!”