Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

7 Comments

  1. You give a rational explanation for current events although I would like you to consider that manipulation applies in the spiritual as well as political life. “There was war in heaven…” and “we wrestle not with flesh and blood…” tells us that other powers are involved and while I respect your choices I also hope that you keep an open mind when world events start looking like the dark ages as church and state combine. This means not letting the majority or miracles determine our beliefs but having a solid foundation to guide our actions.

  2. So you can’t defame someone when they sell there stock image. How gloriously vulgar.

    1. Additionally, Tamati didn’t sell an image of herself- she happened to appear in a photo taken by a professional photographer, who labelled the photo as ‘editorial use only’- i.e. not to promote the agenda of Hobson’s Choice to cause racial division to attack the working classes.

    2. Please try to stay awake. No-one sold their own image – why on earth would you think Ellen Tamati posed, and was paid, for this image? Not even Hobson’s Choice or their agents have claimed any such thing.
      Typical right-wing nutbaggery – when you can’t understand a narrative you just make one up to suit your agenda.

    3. Incorrect.
      What happened with the Kuia is as follows.

      She was photographed in public by a commercial photographer without signing any release or contract. Totally legal.

      Photographer put the image on a stock footage platform under a pretty standard licencing agreement. Also legal.

      The great minds of Jordan Williams etc… breached the contract as it’s very clearly a promotional / advertising campaign.

      Nothing says racist cunts like denying people consent on their own representation.

      In stock footage, context is king.

      Although it’s tempting to put up fake pro-bestiality with the faces of Seymour and Williams on them.

Comments are closed.