| Pressure is increasing on the Auditor General to undertake an inquiry into numerous contracts, appointments and grants awarded to members of Cabinet Minister Nanaia Mahuta’s family by various government departments she has had official responsibility for.
Allegations and revelations are mounting up, meaning this issue can no longer be ignored. As economist and political commentator Eric Crampton wrote yesterday, if the allegations – especially those documented by Herald journalist Kate McNamara – bear up, then “New Zealand is a fundamentally corrupt country. If it doesn’t, the air needs clearing”.
Latest revelations about the Mahuta family contracts
Three government agencies have been undertaking reviews this year into how they came to give contracts to Mahuta’s husband, Gannin Ormsby, and other close family members. Ormsby owns a consultancy, Ka Awatea Services, which has been contracted to supply services in the last couple of years to Kāinga Ora, the Ministry for the Environment, and the Department of Conservation. Another consultancy, Kawai Catalyst, is owned by Ormsby’s nephew and wife, Tomoko and Waimirirangi Ormsby, and has also gained government contracts.
The latest revelation, which MacNamara reported on yesterday, is that Kāinga Ora has admitted it did not follow correct procedures in awarding a contract to Ormsby, and is now undertaking a review of how this occurred. MacNamara reports: “Housing Minister Megan Woods has confirmed that Crown housing agency Kāinga Ora was deficient in its conflict of interest processes in awarding Ka Awatea Services a $66,846 (excluding GST) contract.”
According to Kāinga Ora, Ormsby’s firm was hired to “engage Māori and to understand Māori perspectives on Kāinga Ora urban development work”. The firm then used another relative, Rama Ormsby, to do the work.
It seems no conflict of interest declarations were sought or received from any of the participants, despite Mahuta then being the Associate Minister for Housing with specific responsibility for Māori housing.
MacNamara reports: “Woods previously said that ‘a verbal conflict of interest was declared’ when the contract was initiated, however that statement was corrected late last week with the clarification that no “formal” conflicts, written or verbal, were declared.”
The “Extraordinary pattern” of government contracts
All three contracts that Ka Awatea Services has won with the government agencies were awarded while Ormsby’s wife, Nanaia Mahuta, had ministerial responsibilities for those agencies. Furthermore, as MacNamara reports, “All of the contracts were awarded on a sole source basis, without competitive bids.”
In terms of the contracts provided by the Ministry for the Environment to the family firms Ka Awatea Services and Kawai Catalyst, a review has just been released that shows “a litany of deficiencies in the process of awarding the contracts”. For example, due to the family connections the contracts should have been signed off by the Ministry’s chief executive. Further conflicts of interest were not sufficiently discussed or managed.
The Department of Conservation is also reviewing the process that led to Ka Awatea Services being awarded a $52,000 contract, which has not yet been fully delivered.
In her latest Herald report, MacNamara also reveals that the Government’s Criminal Cases Review Commission has employed Ormsby as a “connector” since January 2021. She reports: “It has been asked whether Ormsby’s criminal record was considered relevant in his hiring but has not yet responded. In 2003, Ormsby pleaded guilty and was convicted on one charge of assaulting a woman.”
In addition, the Waikato Regional Council has recently employed Ormsby for $33,000 to provide consulting services to identify issues Māori were facing in the area, and last year the Ministry of Māori Development gave his firm a $28,000 grant to assist on suicide prevention.
Has Nanaia Mahuta dealt with the conflicts of interest appropriately?
Both the Prime Minister and Nanaia Mahuta have suggested that there is nothing to see here, saying the Minister has followed the correct procedures in dealing with the conflicts of interest arising from these family contracts.
The first device for dealing with a conflict of interest has been for the Minister to essentially recluse herself from the situation by temporarily transferring responsibility in the portfolio to another minister. For example, when her sister Tipa Mahuta was appointed chair of the new Three Waters regulatory advisory group, the Minister passed her Local Government responsibilities to Kelvin Davis while the decision was made.
But this hasn’t always occurred. Kate McNamara points out, for example, when she “appointed Waimirirangi Ormsby to the group that produced the He Puapua report”, this was deemed unnecessary because Ormsby was not a “close relative”.
Mahuta also says that she has covered herself by declaring “conflicts of interest” to the Cabinet Office and colleagues whenever they have arisen. However, just because such a conflict is declared doesn’t mean that it is no longer a problem.
Commenting on this recently to the Herald, Prof Karin Lasthuizen, the Chair in Ethical Leadership at Victoria University of Wellington, has argued that this can be like a passenger declaring the possession of forbidden goods on arrival into the country but not then doing anything about it: “Saying you can manage this conflict is like saying to Customs, ‘Yup I’ve got a big hornets’ nest to declare’, and then Customs says, ‘Okay, here’s a form for you to fill out and you will be fine’. Of course it doesn’t work that way for a reason, and that’s the problem itself and the consequences it might have. You can’t actually bring in a hornets’ nest into the country even if you declare it.”
Is an independent investigation required?
So far, no other journalist or media outlet seem to be covering the ongoing questionable contracts apart from the Herald’s Kate MacNamara. She has written six reports on the topic so far this year. TVNZ’s Q+A programme did raise some of the allegations with Mahuta in an interview by Jack Tame recently, but she was able to easily swot away the questions, painting a picture of herself as a victim of malicious and anonymous online smears and wasn’t challenged on this.
To be fair, there might well be ulterior motives in the scrutiny that is currently being applied to Mahuta from some quarters. The Opposition are continuing to ask questions in Parliament, obviously hoping to inflict damage on the Government. But that’s their legitimate role, and many of the facts about the Mahuta contracts have only come to light through questions being asked in Parliament.
Some have even attempted to paint questions being asked about potential corruption or nepotism as being racist. For example, on Newshub, Labour-aligned commentator Shane Te Pou denounced criticism of Mahuta as “racism and double standards”.
The Herald’s Audrey Young says it’s time to clear the issue up once and for all, saying Mahuta should just front foot the issue because questions are mounting, and they are distracting the Minister from important work: “They have reached such a pitch that she herself should refer the matter to the Public Service Commission or Auditor-General to get an independent opinion and draw a line under it.”
This seems the correct approach. Even if Mahuta and her family have done nothing wrong, it would be very useful for government agencies to review how they deal with conflicts of interests. The issues are too big to be ignored, and the need to prevent corruption is too important to be brushed aside. |
How embarrassing.
How?
Well Stephen the whole affair is an embarrassment?
It’s an embarrassment for Nania Mahuta it’s an embarrassment for the Labour Government it’s an embarrassment for our country.
What about Dr Mary English million dollar suicide contract remember her husband??? Yip Bill English wife.
and that past corruption makes mahuta ok exactly how stephen?
Absolutely agree, let’s look into this and then remind ourselves what happens when there is a conflict of interest when National are involved…nothing, nada nilch!
Where were you then Simeone, in your nappies?
https://thedailyblog.co.nz/2017/08/02/hold-on-national-cut-suicide-helpline-to-give-contract-to-bill-englishs-wife/
Very interesting comments.
The hypocrisy of the right to claim some form of moral high ground and if I’m clearly mistaken Dr Mary English received millions?
Nothing to see here Bryce remember her family feed and protected settlers in Auckland and were the largest financial contributors to govt coffers before they were invaded for dubious reasons on the 12th of July 1863.
Mahuta is not liked by Labour, example, she gain 1 vote for the leadership challenge (she voted for herself)…she is trading on the Mahuta name…her husband is her cousin (that is true), and her tattoo is a mark of wisdom, which she decided she had received…that not how it works…As a Foreign Affairs Minister she is a failure, many Foreign Leaders are uncomfortable having their photo with her, as the Local Government Minister she is just terrible — 3 waters
Got proof or is this the bigoted Nathan today???
Stephen – get off your bum and Google it — otherwise keep believing the magical unicorns of woke town (Wellington)
Name calling is it Stephen?? Wake yourself up
‘As a Foreign Affairs Minister she is a failure, many Foreign Leaders are uncomfortable having their photo with her,’
You’re the bigot making the accusations!!
Stephen — Tattoo are a sign of being a criminal in our biggest trading partners China – Japan…she has it on her face — they (the leaders ) are very uncomfortable having their photo with her…wake up Stephen!
Stephen – also, the USA – Australia – Europe – Middle East – Africa — Canada — are not keen on facial tattoos either…so why did Labour put Mahuta as Foreign Affairs, oh, right — Labour does not want her in NZ
and your grounds for those assumptions are nate?
Some of those Countries don’t exactly have a great track record with their indigenous population to be fair Nathan.
Well said Nathan.
You supplied the truth so not sure what Stephen is on about and true to form Bert blames someone else.
An independent review is required and I see Nania Mahuta is encouraging that so good on her.
Bullshit Bob’s back. Read my post fuckwit, oh you didn’t, saw my name then went full on troll. You moron.
Too much time listening to hipster Hosking. Awaiting the outcome of Mahutas inquiry Bullshit Bob, what was the upshot of the Mary English inquiry when Bill was Prime Minister?
The only embarrassment is Bullshit Bob but we’ve all known that for some time.
Now about that Uffindell inquiry?
You haven’t a clue with what truth looks like Bob. Your comments are evidence of that.
Bob the first if you don’t understand what being commented about then why are you commenting beside exercising your ‘Free speech’? Doesn’t make sense
citation for the foreign dignitaries photo discomfort please nate? failure to produce such citation will suggest a blatent barefaced lie…..
.oh and a rant by someone on what ever ‘chan’ rightards have migrated to doesn’t count.
“due to the family connections the contracts should have been signed off by the Ministry’s chief executive.”
Ministry for the Environment Te Pūrengi Leadership team-
“Vicky Robertson – Secretary for the Environment and Chief Executive:
…Vicky is a champion for diversity and inclusion, te ao Māori and achieving transparency and accountability in the state sector…She has embedded te ao Māori and the Treaty of Waitangi as essential principles in MfE’s work…On weekends Vicky enjoys spending time with her two mokopuna and loves mountain biking in Aotearoa New Zealand’s stunning natural environment.”
Ormsby seems to be expert in a lot of areas, housing, suicide, conservation, regional development, drainage, water infrastructure, criminal cases. It would be good to know what was “facilitated” in all these consultancies which didnt result in any written reports – was the content of the consultancy a secret? Who attended? How many attended? May be there are some phone recordings, video recordings, power point presentations that could be made public so the public can know they are getting value for money or have some transparency around the agenda that may have been pushed by this very connected consultancy firm.
They just practiced kindness.
I personally believe that regardless of whether or not Nanaia Mahuta, one of my personal favourites in politics it should be stated, followed the correct procedures, the contracts should not have been awarded to her family members unless there were not any other suitable contenders. In some instances there were quite possibly other candidates for the contracts who were more suited than Ms. Mahuta’s relations. The buck stops with central government itself as the onus is on them to apply the correct checks and balances to each and every situation. It would not be right, certain not at this early stage in the investigation, to apportion any individual blame directly onto Ms. Mahuta.
And these family members are allowed to decided the future of New Zealand’s water supply….??
Amateur, she should have studied how the nats do it.
Ain’t that the truth.
Name calling is it Stephen?? Wake yourself up
if the excuse is ‘maori relationships are inherently corrupt’ which seems to be the excuse floated I imagine a lot of maori would counter with ‘old school tie’ the fact is NZ is a corrupt little pacific backwater….highlighting this or that instance solves nowt…though it does seem 3 out 5 seats on a ‘waste committe’e going to mates/family is not only corrupt and anti-democratic but as stupid as fuck….maoris real crime is being ‘old skool’ about their corruption rather than the administrative classes more ‘gentlemanly’ corruption.
Stephen – also, the USA – Australia – Europe – Middle East – Africa — Canada — are not keen on facial tattoos either…so why did Labour put Mahuta as Foreign Affairs, oh, right — Labour does not want her in NZ
why don’t you just come out with it nate….it’s about ‘darkies; not tats isn’t it for you.
Comments are closed.