Home Blog Page 2318

GUEST BLOG: Anjum Rahman – A society for everyone

1

edit4daa1d92c0d42a520_200x400c0

Last Friday night I attended the Volunteer Excellence Awards function organised by Volunteering Waikato.  It’s held every year during National Volunteer Week, and is an opportunity to recognise the many groups and individuals who put in their time towards a variety of causes.

It so happened that Friday was also World Refugee Day, a time for us to think of those who flee from war-torn areas or from political or social oppression.  Those who fear for their safety, who are suffering from trauma and often severe poverty.  The evening’s event marked both, by asking the head of the local NZ Red Cross Refugee Services to speak.

Rachel O’Connor spoke about the Afghan interpreters who worked with the NZ Army in Bamyan.  Another 30 families were welcomed into Hamilton yesterday, at an event at the Waikato Migrant Resource Centre.  These families are not refugees, but rather resettled by the NZ Defense Force in recognition of the fact that their lives would be in danger had they not left their country.

They are a lovely group of people, and I’m glad they have received a pretty positive welcomed into this country.  They are lucky to have the backing of the NZDF, with a strong PR machine helping to get their stories into the media.  The men have the added advantage of being able to speak fluent English, so being able to relay those stories in a way that we can understand.

It makes me think about other refugees who don’t have that backing, who don’t get the chance to tell their stories via these same media channels.  And it really bothers me that refugees have come to be seen in such a negative light.  One of the reasons this has happened is the use of political rhetoric to create fear – fear of the other, fear of being over-run by refugees, fear that by giving we will somehow lose out.

It’s almost beyond belief that people who really are some of the most vulnerable are used in this way, so that we are encouraged to overcome our natural feelings of empathy and compassion, and replace these with a sense of begrudging every little bit we do to help them improve their lives.  Of course, not everyone feels that way.  But there are enough who vocalise these thoughts for us to be concerned.

We’ve not yet experienced, in this country, the levels that John Howard reached in his scare-mongering tactics, and thankfully so.  But it seems that there is still a long way to go before we will be raising our refugee quota.  The case was put forward by Murdoch Stevens in this Herald piece, and if you’re not convinced, have a look at the “doing our bit” website.

There is often the argument put forward that we need to be looking after our own first.  But the fact is that we have enough in this country to both look after our own and to do more for refugees in other parts of the world.  That “our own” are not looked after is a matter of distribution of wealth, and the levels of inequality we are prepared to accept.  It doesn’t have to be so, and we could institute a lot of simple measure to ensure that everyone here has a decent standard of living.  We could push for widespread adoption of the living wage policy, increase taxes for those on the highest income levels, have a capital gains tax, have a government policy of full employment, require government to buy New Zealand made in the first instance, and so much more.

But it’s generally the same people who don’t want to increase the refugee intake who also don’t want policies that will reduce income & wealth inequality.  They aren’t really interested in “looking after our own first”, so cannot countenance the thought of looking after a small number of people from other countries, and we do really take in a very small number.

We can and should be doing more.  It’s just a matter of political will.

 

 

Anjum Rahman. – I fit into a lot of boxes – I’m an ethnic minority (born in india), a religious minority (muslim), and a woman. I’m a mother, an accountant, a political activist and a feminist. All of these form part of my identity to a greater or lesser degree. most of all though, I’m a rebel who refuses to fit neatly into boxes or to conform to the patterns that people expect of me.

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Key can’t remember 5 Eye mass spying re-orientation party and we can’t see Governments letters to Donghua Liu

17

image001

John Key has been outed by his American masters who told Journalists that NZ had been “reintegrated” into the 5 eyes spying partnership since Key came to power. Key is desperately spinning that no such decision to re-enter the mass spying network has occurred because of course this would be news to us.

None of us asked for NZ to get more tightly immersed inside the NSA mass surveillance state, that is a debate that has not occurred, clearly Key and his Government have done this secretly minus our consent because they know most NZers would be opposed to getting closer to  the all seeing eye of Washington.

While Key is getting caught out secretly expanding the spying networks, he’s also allowing those networks to be used actively against the domestic population. Seeing as this Government seem to have no ethical qualms about using state resources to fund their smear campaigns against the Opposition, how tempted is the PM to use these spy networks as well? This is why allowing him to appoint his old school mate via  a process that was not the norm is so questionable.

Look at the double standards being applied by the Government to releasing their  Donghua Liu  letters. How come Woodhouse, who has changed his story three times now as to when he informed Key about the letter, was able to get his OIA request made public with hardly any warning to Labour, yet they are able to hide their  Donghua Liu letters?

Add to these type of resources a biased media who are calling for Cunliffe’s resignation and it’s no wonder the opinion polls are where they are. Beyond the manipulated narratives, people watching the campaign will see a very different Cunliffe, a point even Fran O’Sullivan acknowledges in her very interesting column today

Reports from the US that Key quipped National had already taken out the only potential Opposition leader he was worried about – Shane Jones – deserve to be treated with a bit more professional scepticism.

If Key really thinks that, he should not have turned down media requests to go head-to-head with Cunliffe in the election campaign, a response which reveals more than a hint of arrogance and complacency by the PM.

The truth is that Cunliffe can be a stirring debater and is just as quick on his feet as Key.

Right now he’s on the back foot. But the right place to deliver a Gotcha is the election – not in this rather desperate politicking dressed up as a major scandal this week.

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

GUEST BLOG: Finn Jackson – The media chorus

12

no_corporate_media

If I ever had any doubts over the influence of National in our media, those doubts drowned yesterday in a lake of tears.

The sheer bias and hatred displayed towards Mr Cunliffe yesterday, on both the internet and TV news, was apparent even to my inexperienced eyes.

“You lied, Mr Cunliffe.” They chorused. “You had a convenient brain-fade, Mr Cunliffe” they refrained.

I would like to know, exactly how many of these so-called reporters can remember every letter they have signed over their lives. I would like to ask them whether they keep a catalogue in their memories of every letter they have signed and sent to their parents, to their spouses, to their business associates.

I know what is going to be said, this letter wasn’t sent to a loved one or relative. It was business, and should have been remembered, that is what a good politician does.

Quite simply, how many letters has Mr Cunliffe sent over his long career in Parliament? It must be thousands. Yet somehow, out of all the letters they could have miraculously found, they somehow managed to find this single letter which they perceive as having evidence of wrong-doing in it.

Lucky stroke?

A smoking gun, or a broken water pistol?

The TV news now has to compete with news on the Internet. A 24/7 feed of information. They are finding it hard to adapt to the idea of not having a six-o’clock feeding time of information. To compete with this, they need to have a story which can bring in the viewers. A “Shock-horror, the Leader Of the Opposition is a liar” type of thing. And that’s exactly what they got yesterday.

This may explain the vicious grilling of Mr Cunliffe in what I presume to be the entrance hall to Parliament. They needed a sensational news story, perhaps to pick up the poll ratings during the middle of the week, a week dominated by soccer. Not news.

As for the online news. I see nothing but bias there. On a certain well-read news site, there is a poll asking the question “Which Cunliffe gaffe is your favorite?”.

Unnecessary, cruel, and a blatant attempt to further damage Mr Cunliffe’s credibility.

The letter was a very routine piece of work. Maybe the media should get to know what work goes on in your average electorate office. There are also letters at the post office, you know, media.

They aren’t all leaked by the Neo-Liberal faction of Labour, in case you didn’t know where letters come from.

To sum up, I am utterly disgusted by the show of bias and hatred yesterday shown towards David Cunliffe. And as for the Stuff poll, 23% of people polled were undecided on who they would vote for. And many of these people will vote Labour.

And now, if you’ll excuse me, I need to find out my mark for a maths assessment. Adieu, until I write again.

 

 

My name is Finn Jackson. I turned sixteen this year. I was born into a family of journalists who were very involved in politics. Since birth I have been surrounded by talk of Mayoralty Campaigns and election stratergies. This has influenced my entire life, and has prompted me recently to join the movement for change.

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

What the Glenn Report tells us

20

Screen Shot 2014-06-21 at 7.01.25 am

This week saw the release of the Glenn Report, a report on child abuse and domestic violence in New Zealand.  It makes for pretty depressing reading. Also this week we see another senseless murder of one of our children, an 8 month old killed and a man charged with his murder, It’s heart breaking to me.  We have the 5th highest rate of child abuse in the OECD.

We should ALL be talking about this, we should ALL be demanding action.  It should have been all over the news.  Instead a particularly biased media has chosen to fill it’s bulletin’s with David Cunliffe and an 11 year old letter.  Shame on them.

148,659 notifications of suspected child abuse were reported to CYFS in the year ending June 2013, which leaves me wondering how many more weren’t reported.  Police respond to a family violence call every 7 minutes in this country.  EVERY 7 MINUTES.  Where are our social agencies in all of this, why is the National Government standing by and letting our children be hurt and killed?  It is well past the time when something desperately needs to be done.  Paula Bennett Minister of Social Destruction denies poverty, she denies that funding has been cut and laughs and belittles this subject in Parliament when questioned.  She is an embarrassment to this country with her lack of empathy, understanding and action.  Allowing our kids to live in poverty as she brags about cutting $1 billion from welfare spending is child abuse through chosen ignorance by this National Party, as parents and kids are living in tents and parks.  She doesn’t care.

New Zealand is currently not a great place for many families, especially our women and children as our many systems including family court fail them.  Poverty is adding to the stress and depression and causing an inability to cope for many as help rapidly disappears and National brags about the money they have saved.  It makes my blood boil.

It is time to stand up for our rights, stand up for our kids and our elderly as abuse rises on both because one day it could be you or your kids that no one stands up and shouts for, it could be you that needs some help.  Or should we just keep doing nothing and hope it goes away?  It won’t.

How many more babies need to die before this heartless Government does something about our national shame?  For me, one was one too many.  It is to me a disgusting indication of our Government’s priorities, it’s money, money over a precious life every single time.

glenninquiry.org.nz   Read it.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Coalition for Better Broadcasting: Soul Sound

6

unnamed

In case you haven’t heard, ours is an ageing population.  Also, in case you haven’t heard, with age comes deteriorating eyesight. As people slide into their forties, they realise they are having trouble reading street names as they drive along.  So off to the optician’s.  Then, into their sixties and seventies, come cataracts and macula degeneration; never mind just plain eye fatigue. With these challenges come problems with reading and watching television.  So, what does one do for quiet diversion?  Listen to radio of course.  Those whose taste is for popular music are well catered for by the commercial channels – too well catered for, it could be argued and the Concert programme caters well for aficionados of classical music.

For those who like to keep a lively interest in what is going on in the country and in the wider world – such as new developments in science, the arts, medicine; who enjoy in depth interviews with interesting people, experts in their respective fields; who like panel discussions, drama, the occasional humourous programme – Radio New Zealand National is the answer.

But it is under threat.  Budget cuts have already seen a diminution of programmes on offer.  The long-running programme ‘Sunday Supplement’ was axed a few years ago.  Those balanced, well-informed four-minute opinion pieces, delivered by competent individuals, are still missed.

Radio New Zealand National is truly a public service.  It is of benefit not only to those with age-related sight problems but also the lonely of all ages.  As well, while doing practical, routine tasks, it is good to have the mind engaged by something of interest on radio. And we have yet to mention those who have never been able to see.

Radio New Zealand is a national taonga to be cherished.  It’s continuance, nay enhancement, is an issue well worth voting for.

 

Anne Ferguson is a member of the Coalition for Better Broadcasting. She is a retired PA though finds secretarial roles in the voluntary sector (Am Drams, Citizens’ Advice, University of the Third Age) more satisfying. Her guilty secret? She’s a ‘Coronation Street’ addict.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Progressive Politics Is Not A Game: Chris Trotter responds to Rob Salmond

31

image002

“ALL THE WORLD’S A STAGE” says Shakespeare in As You Like It, “and all the men and women merely players”. Life as a play: as the mischievous scribbling of some amoral dramaturgical deity; is a metaphor as old as the theatre itself.

Closely related, and just as old, is the metaphor of life as a game. Taken as a whole, or broken up into its most vivid elements, the human experience is reduced to something as artificial and essentially meaningless as the turn of a card, the muscular efficiency of a horse or the physics of a rolling pair of dice.

What lies behind both of these metaphors is the desperate need of those who make use of them to empty their personal conduct of all moral agency. Actors do not write the lines they are obliged to read, nor do they control the way their scenes unfold. The shape of the plot is somebody else’s responsibility – not theirs. It’s much the same for game players. They didn’t make the rules, but having opted to play the game they’re obliged to follow them. “Love ‘em or hate ‘em,” say the players, “the rules are the rules.” Or, in the words of a recent blog posting: “The game is the game.” 

The “game” referred to in that posting is the “game” of politics and its author, Rob Salmond, is commenting on the skill (or lack of it) displayed by the National Party in its attempted smearing of David Cunliffe.

“National certainly knew about it well before anyone else, and were gloating about it on online forums over the past weekend. I’m betting National also had a hand in cajoling reporters to ask very particular questions of Cunliffe just hours before the incriminating OIA would be released.

“And, to be blunt, there’s nothing really wrong with that.”

And right there – in Salmond’s bland sentence – lies the source of all Labour’s woe.

Implicit in Salmond’s exoneration of National is the notion that politics is a game in which deception, entrapment and public humiliation are all well within the rules. A game for players without scruple or regret. Players to be judged not according to any moral code, but simply according to how adroitly they wield the officially sanctioned weapons of the game.

Salmond admits as much when he upbraids National for bungling the job:

“If you are going to orchestrate a smear against your opponent, but hope to fade into the background while the smear unfolds, it really pays to have your cover-up stories straight.”

He then goes on to gloat about how much better Labour is at smearing its opponents:

“Did you ever hear about Labour’s role in forcing [redacted] of the [redacted] party to resign back in [redacted]? No, I bet you didn’t.”

Presumably Salmond expects his readers to offer up a professional chuckle at this little gem. In much the same way that a Mafia hit-man would acknowledge a fellow assassin’s description of how he dispatched his latest victim. After all, when “the game is the game” there’s simply no room for the squeamish. Indeed, Salmond and his fellow professionals have a name for those who feel nauseated by such behaviour. They call them ‘losers’.

The real loser, of course, is the noble calling of progressive politics. The sort of politics that Labour’s Mickey Savage, eighty years ago, was quite unembarrassed to describe as “applied Christianity”. Unembarrassed, because Savage wasn’t a “professional” politician in any sense that Salmond might recognise. Born into poverty, largely self-educated, quietly spoken and diminutive of stature, Savage did not conceive of politics as a “game”. For him it was the only means by which ordinary, decent working people could secure the prerequisites of an abundant life for themselves and their children.

The Labour Party of Savage, Fraser and Nash, Nordmeyer, Kirk and Rowling did not need to master the dark arts of smearing their opponents. They did battle with the National Party on the sunlit field of policy. The only thing their conservative opponents were “forced” to do was to tell the voters why Labour’s policies of social uplift and collective progress could not possibly be implemented. The basements and back alleys of deception and entrapment remained the natural environment of blackmailers and pimps: the immoral milieu into which such criminal elements have always faded.

But that all changed in the 1980s when Labour’s caucus embraced the politics of “professional” neoliberal governance and abandoned the New Zealand working-class to its fate. It was then that the practice of progressive democratic politics ceased to be the open-ended process of collective emancipation that it had been from the 30s to the 70s. With both Labour and National now irreversibly committed to upholding the rules of neoliberalism, politics ceased to be about turning progressive and emancipatory ideas into reality, and became instead a contest designed to identify which team of politicians was most adept at playing the neoliberal game.

And what else but the skills of deception, entrapment and public humiliation would such politicians seek to master? When “the game is the game” what can politics be – apart from an unceasing effort to beset and belittle the men and women of the opposing teams? An endless conspiracy to make your opponents look like losers.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

A storm is no reason to change our conservation law

0

MIL OSI – Source: Green Party –

Headline: A storm is no reason to change our conservation law



It is illegal to log these forests, a storm is no reason to change the law.

New Zealand’s wild conservation land should be protected from logging, the Green Party said today.

National has announced plans to allow logging of native forest on public land on the West Coast damaged in Cyclone Ita.

“It is illegal to log these forests, a storm is no reason to change the law,” Green Party conservation spokesperson Eugenie Sage said today.

“New Zealanders fought for years to end native logging and protect the West Coast’s forests. We shouldn’t turn back the clock.

“It’s a bad precedent to change the law on a case by case, storm by storm basis. The public are not even going to get a say, the law will be pushed through under urgency.

“This is more boom and bust short term thinking from this Government for the West Coast. This proposal isn’t going to create sustainable long term jobs.

“Weakening our conservation law sets a dangerous precedent.

“Nowhere is protected from this Government. National is happy to allow our rivers to be too polluted to swim in, let the Maui’s Dolphin go extinct, and wanted to open up our national parks for mining. We can’t let them weaken our conservation law.

“It doesn’t matter how careful you are. By removing these trees we are taking away precious nutrients that will feed the next forest giants.

“We don’t need to restart the battles of the 1990’s, National needs to leave our protected forests alone.

“National is on the wrong path with this proposal, New Zealanders love our native forests and National needs to leave them alone,” said Ms Sage.

“The Department of Conservation shouldn’t have to allow logging of our native forests to pay for pest control, National needs to fund DOC properly,” said Ms Sage.

© Multimedia Investments Ltd Terms of Use/Disclaimer.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Labour will lift cap for medical students

0

MIL OSI – Source: Labour Party –

Headline: Labour will lift cap for medical students

Labour is backing calls from the country’s medical students to lift a government-imposed seven year study cap.

“Medical students are being stopped in their tracks by National’s limit on student support, Labour’s Tertiary Education spokesperson Maryan Street says.

“The government introduced a seven year limit on access to student loans and allowances in 2010. That is now beginning to impact on medical students who typically take more time than that to complete a post-graduate qualification.

“It seems it was meant to hurry people along to get their degrees as soon as possible, but it is backfiring badly on this group of students.

“Labour supports the NZ Medical Students’ Association in its campaign to get medical students exempted from the restriction, known as the ‘7 Equivalent Full Time Students (7EFTS)’ cap.

“A survey by members of the Students’ Association in Otago and Auckland, of their colleagues, has revealed some disturbing results.

“Ninety per cent of students surveyed intended to use a student loan to finance their medical studies while 41 per cent were unaware of the 7EFTS cap. When asked how they would fund themselves to complete their studies, 47 per cent said they didn’t know or would not be able to complete their medical studies.

“That is a disaster for health workforce forward planning.

“It seems that while the cap was not intended to catch medical students, it has.

“Steven Joyce could easily correct this.

“A Labour Government will lift the cap and ensure New Zealand is guaranteed a constant supply of specialised medical practitioners, who may take more than seven years to qualify,” said Maryan Street.

© Multimedia Investments Ltd Terms of Use/Disclaimer.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Electricity demand down – prices up

0

MIL OSI – Source: Labour Party –

Headline: Electricity demand down – prices up

The electricity market is broken and not delivering to Kiwis, said Labour’s Energy Spokesperson, David Shearer.

“The latest government figures show that demand for electricity is the lowest it’s been since 2009. Yet in that time prices have risen 19% – or more than four times the rate of inflation.

“If the market was functioning normally energy companies would compete harder for customers and prices would fall.

“Energy Minister Bridges said just last year that ’if flat demand remained, you do have to go back to the fourth or fifth form economics. You do have the conditions for flat prices, and maybe even decreasing prices.’

“Well Minister, where are those decreasing prices? Perhaps you need to go back to your college text books and explain why Kiwis are paying for ever higher prices when demand is dropping.

“This government is out of touch with New Zealanders. People know their power prices are going up to further the profits of energy companies.

“The market is working for our newly privatised energy companies.

“Consumers are being stung for higher prices – and our privatised energy companies are enjoying large profits.

“Meanwhile overseas, where demand as fallen, consumers have been enjoying cheaper power. Labour will reform the electricity market so that it delivers for New Zealanders.

“It will save New Zealand families hundreds of dollars and curb these unjustified price rises.”

Link to Report  http://www.med.govt.nz/sectors-industries/energy/energy-modelling/data/electricity

© Multimedia Investments Ltd Terms of Use/Disclaimer.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Govt tricky on real cost of asset sales

0

MIL OSI – Source: Green Party –

Headline: Govt tricky on real cost of asset sales



“The Government is being extremely tricky when it says Treasury’s cost for the asset sales was just $85.5 million plus the $35.1 million paid by the companies themselves.”

The true costs of the Government’s asset sales are over $640 million, more than five times the $120.6 million National is claiming today, Green Party Co-leader Russel Norman said.

“The Government is being extremely tricky when it says Treasury’s cost for the asset sales was just $85.5 million plus the $35.1 million paid by the companies themselves,” said Dr Norman.

Among the other costs to get the sales away were:

  • · The cost of bonus shares and incentives paid for the sale of Genesis, Mighty River Power, and Meridian – $80 million
  • · A $145 million difference in the cost of foregone dividends and reduced interest costs
  • · $30 million paid by the government to stop Rio Tino closing the Tiwai Point aluminum smelter
  • · Over $378 million net loss of assets against book value
  • · Asset sales referendum $9 million
  • · Bonus payment paid to CEOs of SOE’s $1 million

“The asset sales were projected to bring in between $5 billion to $7 billion. Instead they realised $4.7 billion in gross terms and under $4 billion when all the costs are account for,” Dr Norman said.

“The interest received from sales is less than the foregone dividends – that’s plain bad economics.

“Over a million people voted against the assets sales in the referendum. Nearly everyone understood it was a bad idea. That National is not going into this election with an asset sales programme shows that even they understand it has been a failure.

“New Zealanders will pay for these costs through higher power prices and the loss of services the dividend payments could have paid for,” said Dr Norman.

© Multimedia Investments Ltd Terms of Use/Disclaimer.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Key doing deal with US that benefits Wall Street

0

MIL OSI – Source: Green Party –

Headline: Key doing deal with US that benefits Wall Street



John Key has the perfect opportunity with his upcoming meeting with President Obama to tell the New Zealand public just why we have been negotiating this agreement in secret.

John Key needs to tell the public why New Zealand is currently involved in a trade deal to benefit Wall Street at the expense of Queen Street, Green Party Co-leader Dr Russel Norman said today.

The text of a 19-page, international trade agreement involving New Zealand has just been published via WikiLeaks. According to the United States Chamber of Commerce, the Trade in Service Agreement (TISA) ‘should expand access to foreign markets for United States service industries and ensure they receive national and most-favoured nation treatment’.

“The United States is pushing to limit regulation of financial services,” said Dr Norman.

“The Trade in Services Agreement (TISA) is a deal aimed at locking the sort of policies that caused the Global Financial Crisis in the first place.

“The United States also want to freeze financial regulation at existing levels, which would severely limit the ability of sovereign governments to deal with another global financial crisis.

“The New Zealand public has been kept completely in the dark about this agreement,” said Dr Norman.

“All the New Zealand public has been told about this deal is a few paragraphs on the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade’s website that promotes all the potential upsides of this deal while failing to point out the downsides.

“For a major world-wide financial services agreement that could restrict the ability of a future New Zealand government to regulate this is simply not good enough.

“John Key has the perfect opportunity with his upcoming meeting with President Obama to tell the New Zealand public just why we have been negotiating this agreement in secret.

“Mr Key and his officials also need to clearly spell out the potential downsides of this agreement for the New Zealand public.”

Link to the Wikileaks page on TISA:

https://wikileaks.org/tisa-financial/WikiLeaks-secret-tisa-financial-annex.pdf

© Multimedia Investments Ltd Terms of Use/Disclaimer.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Misleading costs the final insult on asset sales

0

MIL OSI – Source: Labour Party –

Headline: Misleading costs the final insult on asset sales

Today’s claim by the Government that the cost of the asset sales programme was $120 million is just a lie, says Labour’s SOEs spokesperson Clayton Cosgrove.

“The Government and Treasury need to be straight up with the taxpayer on the costs of the asset sales which totals well over half a billion dollars. Treasury has ignored a whole series of costs and bonuses.

“National’s asset sales policy was a massive failure. At the last election John Key promised Kiwis the sales would raise between $5 billion and $7 billion. They ended up well short of that because they mismanaged the sales process and drove Solid Energy into the ground.

“The  Government claimed that the costs of the sales would be no more than 2 per cent of the proceeds; however it has ballooned out to well over twice what they claimed.

“In their list of costs today, Treasury has omitted to include the bonus and free share schemes  which cost $80 million, the $30 million subsidy for Rio Tinto, the increases to executive salaries, the foregone dividends and the losses on the sales .

“The Government needs to come clean on what the real costs to the taxpayer are. The asset sales programme has been a massive failure and misleading people over the costs is the final slap in the face for the public.”

Partial list of omitted asset sale costs and expenses

Bonus and Free Shares: $80m

  • Bonus shares for MRP $25.0m
  • Cost of Meridian incentive $33.0m
  • Cost of Genesis bonus shares $22m

Foregone dividends: $147m so far

Rio Tinto subsidy: $30.0m

Bonus payment to MRP CEO, increased board and CEO salaries: At least $1 million (as supported by Bill English)

Losses on sale: $383m

© Multimedia Investments Ltd Terms of Use/Disclaimer.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Cartwright appointment to war crimes panel welcomed

0

MIL OSI – Source: Labour Party –

Headline: Cartwright appointment to war crimes panel welcomed

Labour congratulates Dame Silvia Cartwright on her appointment to the United Nations Human Rights Council investigation into war crimes and human rights abuses in Sri Lanka.

“Her reputation is second to none and we are delighted she will be contributing to this long awaited tribunal,” says Labour’s Human Rights spokesperson Maryan Street.

“It is an indictment on the government that it is left to Dame Silvia to uphold New Zealand’s reputation on human rights singlehandedly,” she said.

“The New Zealand government did not support the British protest at Sri Lanka being the next Chair of the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM), nor did it support the UN Human Rights Council resolution to establish this panel.

“If we are to contribute meaningfully on the United Nations Security Council, upholding human rights is a basic requirement. We thank Dame Silvia for doing this in place of the government.”

© Multimedia Investments Ltd Terms of Use/Disclaimer.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

TPPAwatch Another trade deal that threatens democracy – TISA

0

MIL OSI – Source: Unite Union –

Headline: TPPAwatch Another trade deal that threatens democracy – TISA

Recently we wrote you about two giant investment treaties being secretly negotiated between governments and corporations, the EU-US TTIP and the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA). Our brochure Trade Deals That Threaten Democracy exposed the corporate power grab behind these two mega-treaties and the huge impact they would have on our lives and on future generations. We asked for your support to expose and defeat these instruments for enforcing corporate rule.

TTIP and TPPA are not the only treaties being cooked up secretly. A new report from our sister organization Public Services International exposes the threat to public services in the secret negotiations around the proposed Trade in Services Agreement (TISA) driven by a group of countries calling themselves “The really good friends of services” whose rich core includes the US, EU, Japan, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland and South Korea.

TISA, the report shows, would build on the work of the WTO and bilateral trade and investment agreements to open wider for privatization and deregulation such essential services as education, health, water and transport and make it impossible for governments to reverse privatizations and restore these services to public control even where private ownership has failed. TISA would impose new obstacles to public interest regulation to protect workers, consumers and the environment and block initiatives to regulate global finance.

“Public services”, says IUF General Secretary Ron Oswald, “are workers’ unique form of accumulated wealth – unique because it is public – in an increasingly unequal world, and must be staunchly defended.”

You can download the report here. We urge you to read it, distribute it, spread the word in your unions and in your communities, and tell your political representatives “No to TISA, no to trade deals that threaten democracy!”

© Multimedia Investments Ltd Terms of Use/Disclaimer.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Cunliffe can’t remember an 11 year old letter and has to resign but Woodhouse can’t remember a 6 week old letter he told Prime Minister about and isn’t resigning?

25

SCCZEN_A_211008SPLWHOUSE_300x200

Whoever tipped Woodhouse off to look where he did, and then started the whispering campaign inside Labour to coincide with the release of the letter just before the 3 month loophole  isn’t known. Yet. But the lies National have needed to engage in once they started fumbling this smear  campaign is already falling to pieces.

The timeline shows Woodhouse lying about when he knew about the letter and when he told Key, it’s a clear cut case of smearing…

Minister’s account

May 8: Immigration Minister Michael Woodhouse is questioned in the House and by media about his meetings and any National Party association with Donghua Liu. Mr Woodhouse requests information on the file to see if there is anything relevant that he needs to know about. The Herald requests Liu’s residency file under the Official Information Act (OIA)

May 9: In response to file review, Mr Woodhouse is verbally advised – among other things – of the existence of two Parliamentary advocacy letters regarding Donghua Liu, one from Mr Cunliffe and another from the office of Chris Carter.

Weekend of 10-11 May: Mr Woodhouse informs Prime Minister John Key’s Office of the existence of the letters.

Week 12-16 May: Mr Woodhouse’s office receives hard copy of letters.

May 16: The Herald’s OIA request is declined on privacy grounds

Mid-late May: Mr Woodhouse’s office provides copy of letters to the Prime Minister’s office.

16 June: The Herald run story on Labour donations and connections. TheHerald puts in an OIA request for MP representations for Donghua Liu to Immigration NZ.

18 June: Immigration NZ release Mr Cunliffe’s Donghua Liu letter to the Herald

June 19:

• 2pm Mr Woodhouse denies telling Mr Key about the letters

• 3pm Mr Woodhouse says officials from his office briefed Mr Key’s office on the letters.

• 7pm Mr Woodhouse’s office says the minister himself told Mr Key’s office about the letters and his office also gave copies of the letters to Mr Key’s office.

…NZers do not care for this type of dirty politics and they don’t like the bullying. None of what has been revealed to date discredits any of the legitimate criticism that Labour have levelled at National for their access to influence for cash dealings. Cunliffe didn’t advocate for Donghua Liu, he simply started asked when he could expect a response and it was 11 years ago. To make an 11 year old letter memory fade the level of political debate suggests an editorial class who are virtual members of the National Party caucus rather than the voice of free media.

Donghua Liu is now in direct contact with National Party handlers and he has made these claims of donating up to $300 000 and it’s a line that Key has been more than happy to insinuate as true when speaking to journalists in Washington. Beyond the shock of this though is the Labour Party piecing together what has happened and they are certain that no such donations of that magnitude were ever paid. Compounding this is that some years ago the disk containing this data was stolen. Take from that what you will.

It seems highly unlikely that Donghua Liu could have donated $300 000 to Labour without it showing up on the books. It could be that Donghua Liu has given his handlers sensationalist exaggerations which the Prime Minister has excitedly leapt upon or it could be some internal corruption inside Labour which took the donation and kept it. Either way, that’s not Cunliffe’s fault  and the issue that now emerges is how active National have been in manufacturing this smear.

Do we really want personal political vendettas  being resourced directly via Cabinet Ministers?  I think National’s arrogance has expanded to such a level that they think this kind of political manipulation is perfectly acceptable. What  happens if voters suddenly get a raft of these dirty ops being exposed just before the election? What would NZers think when they see the kind of tactics the National Party are prepared to indulge in when they don’t think anyone is looking?

Let’s see how NZers vote then.

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

STAY CONNECTED

11,996FansLike
4,057FollowersFollow

Foreign policy + Intel + Security

Subscribe | Follow | Bookmark
and join Buchanan & Manning LIVE Thursdays @ midday

MIL Public Webcast Service