Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

5 Comments

  1. Who does he have to apologize to .He quoted the incident as a reason to enact a policy that most supported .Only woke Greenies would think otherwise

    1. Let’s see, is it calling a female boxer a man? I guess being such a fan of this coalition of wankers, you have lost any standards but repeating bullshit used to be frowned upon. That said, bullshit is the currency that the majority of them deal in so even they must get confused.

  2. Nothing new here.
    The Russian gender tests were claimed to be bogus at the time of the scandal.

    What amuses me is the inevitable [insert the name of target to be smeared here] has ” close links to the Kremlin” phrase.
    That’s Rachel Maddow’s favourite line.

  3. Surely the question is; did Algeria’s Khelif and Taiwan’s Lin Yu-ting fail IBA gender eligibility tests prior competing as women boxers at the Olympics – yes or no? It’s a question of safety. Who asked the question and who was “fooled” by it is secondary. Remember Tamara Press.

Comments are closed.