Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

One Comment


  1. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/530376/referee-told-officials-christchurch-mosque-gunman-was-good-outstanding-young-man
    …On Thursday, a former police vetting officer, who interviewed both of the referees put forward for his firearms licence application, gave evidence in the coroner’s court.

    Police have already accepted the two referees were not suitable as one was an online friend the terrorist played video games with, and the other was that friend’s parent.
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/530376/referee-told-officials-christchurch-mosque-gunman-was-good-outstanding-young-man
    The vetting officer said he had been in the role more than 20 years by 2017 when he conducted the interviews and had never had any complaints about the way he filled out the vetting guide.

    He said his job was simply to ask the questions and record the answers.
    He told the inquest by the time of the interviews, he already knew both referees from previous dealings as they were firearms licence holders themselves…</b

    (That’s well-known psychological effect in officials put in place to monitor actions and limit and control people. And why it can’t be relied on for controls or simply passing laws by-laws etc as they can end up go-by laws.)

    After reading how kind men are to other men with guns, I laugh when I think I am being charged $200 for parking too long in town one afternoon. Are we whacky or not??

Comments are closed.