Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

One Comment

  1. The MH review is inspiring, but addresses the primary need for seismic attitudinal shifts. it makes recommendations, but is in no way a blueprint. Having worked in the specialist mental health services for 6 years I can attest to the glacial pace for implementing even the slightest change within DHBs. Institutional mindset and the clinical model are major barriers to the reforms necessary.

    So yes, it is going to take several working groups to tackle the different areas: the needs of adult inpatients are different to youth; lumping ID and MH forensic patients together in unfit for purpose facilities is going to take a massive injection of money to sort out and resource; establishing community based hubs of care should have been implemented and adequately resourced before they closed the asylums years ago. Inadequate staffing levels and training also need addressing.

    Sure a whole heap of money would help, but the problems are complex, not only the addressing of the illnesses themselves, but run down inadequate facilities nationwide and a burned-out and discouraged work force. It needs to be done right for the most vulnerable in our communities

Comments are closed.