LynnMall terror attack survivors suffering ‘severe trauma’ two years on
Survivors and witnesses of the LynnMall terror attack have together asked a coroner to hold a public inquest into the event.
A hearing is under way in Auckland to determine the scope and form of a coronial inquiry into the death of Ahamed Samsudeen more than two years ago.
He was fatally shot by the police after stabbing eight people in a supermarket in September 2021, shortly after his release from prison.
Coroner’s counsel Anna Adams said a group of 12 survivors and witnesses still had unanswered questions and wanted a public inquest.
“The entire event was less than five minutes. All of the survivors describe a scene of panic, chaos and fear in the supermarket during the incident.
“All of them describe fearing for their own lives and the lives of others.
“Many of them experienced terror and extreme distress at seeing the injuries that Mr Samsudeen inflicted on members of the public with a kitchen knife that he had picked up in the supermarket.
“Many of the survivors have no memory of the incident after a certain point and it’s often the point that they escaped the threat of immediate harm.”
The survivors are a group of Auckland residents, six women and six men, who were aged between 29 and 77 years at the time of the attack.
Adams said the survivors’ “primary motivations for participation in this inquiry are to support each other (especially those who suffered life-threatening physical injuries) and to try to prevent a re-occurrence of tragic events such as unfolded in Countdown”.
She said they supported holding an inquest, a public hearing.
It is VERY hard to read the report on the New Lynn Terrorist Ahamed Samsudeen and not see how our intervention as the State in his life turned an angry young man into a knife stabbing terrorist.
Everything about our interaction with Ahamed Samsudeen radicalised him, and there really has to be some exceptionally hard questions asked of almost every State Service who dealt with him because all it looks like is we manufactured a terrorist by the way we treated him.
Legitimate domestic terror threats to the State must be nullified and prevented at all costs, but fantasists who believe in a magical world of make believe need to be responded to proportionally no matter how their behaviour frightens the rest of us.
As we struggle at the height of all the economic and social pressures that are tearing us apart, I fear our fear will cause us to blunder it into something worse.
Two and a half years on from the Lynn Mall terror attack – what have we learned?
Not much, but we are repeating the fuelling of extremism.
Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.
If you can’t contribute but want to help, please always feel free to share our blogs on social media.
INZ should never have let him into the country in the first place. Letting him leave for Syria would have been sensible. It is not our job to entertain or reform terrorists.
jack – 100% Correct…the last two terrorists were Australian, and Sri Lankan…why is this happening?
Tarrant was an anomaly, an Australian with residency rights. Multiculturalism’s failure is accepting cultures with values incompatible with our own.
jack – I hope it is an anomaly…
Absolutely correct Jack.
It should not be our job to make terrorists as well yet you seem happy to ignore that part of the equation.
Our gate keepers failed. That’s where it started.
Exactly, and as most of the other commentators above have also said.
A good step might be for some of the victims to take a call action against Immigration, who made the completely stupid and foolhardy decision to allow this individual into the country. Blood on their hands.
We let too many criminals, terrorists, exploiters & people who undermine our society in. This needs to stop.
Look at the current state of the UK.
We have been warned.
Yes, the current prime minister is alien to British values and should be deported.
Then you would no doubt agree the current SNP leader must also go.
I mean, when it comes down to it, all you need to know is that the guy’s initial conviction was for having ISIS material.
ISIS is an organization created by America and ‘israel’. ‘israel’ continues to provide arms and medical support to ISIS and other terrorist groups in Syria like the so called ‘Free Syrian Army’. While it certainly doesn’t justify his actions, as long as we’re in bed with the yanks and their bosses, there’s a chance that the terrorism they support could blow back on us.
Have you any evidence to support this remarkable fantasy?
This might go some way to explaining the usual explanation for the rise of ISIS – demobilized Iraqi military professionals, by robbing the Bank in Mosul, and similar early successes, were able to create the impression of a mandate of heaven.
https://time.com/3900753/isis-iraq-syria-army-united-states-military/
This is pretty common knowledge, though not acknowledged in foreign-subverted NZ regime media.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/01/19/israeli-defense-minister-if-i-had-to-choose-between-iran-and-isis-id-choose-isis/
https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf-chief-acknowledges-long-claimed-weapons-supply-to-syrian-rebels/
ISIS has even openly apologized to their ‘israeli’ masters after hitting them while trying to go after Syrian civilians.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/isis-israel-defence-force-apology-attack-unit-golan-heights-defense-minister-moshe-ya-alon-a7700616.html
Obiter dictum: the enemy of my enemy is my friend. However temporary. Which western country did not initially come to the aid of those Syrian civilians begging for help against the Syrian butcher?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/isis-israel-is-the-only-country-terrorist-group-fears-says-first-western-journalist-to-survive-islamic-state-a6793876.html
I agree.
The State, it appears, while perhaps not initiating his radicalisation, certainly fanned it and its overbearing oversight goaded him toward the inevitable conclusion.
Better they had just let him go to Syria if that was what he wanted and then barred him from reentry.
He should never have been allowed into the “country” in the first place, along with many others.
The scumbag turned on the very country that so generously gave him refuge. Not our fault he turned out how he turned out. He should never have been allowed in.
How does the state persuade a violent offender to undertake a rehabilitation programme when that offender refuses to participate?