Science will save cannabis referendum from Reefer Madness


One of the most powerful effects of cannabis is to addle the minds of those who don’t use it.

As we approach our once-in-a-generation chance to finally end cannabis prohibition with the referendum next year, we are in the midst of a Reefer Madness campaign of fearmongering.

The Government, so far, has been absent without leave. As I’ve pointed out before, senior Ministers have left it up to parliament’s youngest MP, Chloe Swarbrick, to carry the baton for reform. Chloe is not even part of the Government.

Cannabis might cause some harm for some people, but this strategy is madness for everyone.

The information vacuum has been filled by the likes of Family First and we are all suffering as a result.

So here’s the good news. And it is really, really, good news.

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has asked the Chief Science Advisor to gather a panel of experts and run an information campaign, to finally dispel the cannabis misinformation spread by the likes of Family First and the Hawkesby-Hoskings propaganda machine.

TDB Recommends

It’s what I called for recently here on The Daily Blog. It is what this discussion desperately needs, so that New Zealanders can make a truly informed choice.

Juliet Gerrard will convene local experts in the field to finally provide the facts missing from the one-dimensional “debate” the mainstream media run to get the clicks they need for survival.

Hosking and Hawkesby, in particular, have been peddling biased waffle with no credibility. Yet it’s everywhere and it’s corrosive. People are lapping it up.

In contrast, the Chief Science Advisor will coordinate a “short, authoritative, accessible and unbiased summary of the evidence for the harms and benefits of legalised cannabis.”

It will be peer reviewed internationally, and placed “in the context of Aotearoa New Zealand.”

It will be unbiased and will not make a recommendation how people should vote.

Among the questions to be addressed are the potential non-medical benefits of recreational cannabis use (for example, reduction in costs for the justice system), and the impacts of decriminalisation versus legalisation of adult cannabis use.

Membership of the expert panel will be announced next month, with their full report expected to be released in January 2020. If the intention is to end the information vacuum, they should publish interim reports along the way about a selection of contentious issues.

This is exactly what we need. Well done for listening, Government!

And when it comes to developing the model for the referendum, I hope they’ll keep listening. The best model yet developed is in Illinois, and it was designed in conjunction between whole-of-government and advocates including NORML.

In future posts I’ll be exploring how a model based on social equity and social justice could be what it takes to win the referendum.

In the meantime, bask in this morsel of good news. Cannabis deserves it.

Public-facing advice on Cannabis

Terms of ReferencePreamble

In order to help inform the public in the lead up to the referendum on the legalisation of cannabis, the Prime Minister has asked her Chief Science Advisor, Professor Juliet Gerrard, to coordinate a short, authoritative, accessible and unbiased summary of the evidence for the harms and benefits of legalised cannabis. This will include an assessment of the international evidence base for the potential impacts of its legislation. It will not make recommendations.

Aotearoa New Zealand is a world leader in some aspects of cannabis research and has a number of experts in the field connected to the international research community. Professor Gerrard will bring together a team of these leading scientists and researchers in cannabis, its effects, and the impacts of changes in legislation overseas, to review and assemble the information into an accessible format. This information will be peer reviewed by the Chief Science Advisor Forum and international experts, ahead of release.

Cannabis for recreational (adult) use has been legalszed overseas, e.g. in a number of states in the United States of America, as well as in Uruguay and, most recently, Canada. Cannabis use has been decriminalised in a number of other jurisdictions. There is a substantial body of literature on the effects of cannabis, including from the longitudinal studies conducted in Aotearoa New Zealand, and a growing evidence base on the impacts of decriminalisation and of legalisation. The group will assist in gathering the peer-reviewed literature, providing a balanced summary, and placing it in the context of Aotearoa New Zealand.

Questions to be addressed

The information summary will include the evidence base to address the following specific questions:
• What are the personal and societal harms from recreational cannabis use?1
• What are the potential non-medical benefits of recreational cannabis use? e.g. reduction in
costs for the justice system
• What is the evidence base surrounding impacts of decriminalisation of recreational cannabis use, and how might the impacts be monitored?
• What is the evidence base surrounding the impacts of legalisation of recreational cannabis use, and how might the impacts be monitored?
• What is the confidence level around the evidence base and where are there important gaps in our knowledge?

Out of scope: The material will not address the medical benefits of cannabis or its derivatives. Nor will the evidence base for availability of effective cannabis testing, e.g. for drivers, be included. Both these important topics have been and will be addressed in different pieces of work.


• Terms of Reference clarified.
• Panel approached and appointed.
• The membership of the group will be made public and provide guidance to the Office of the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor in preparing a summary of the peer-reviewed evidence that answers the questions above and identifies gaps and uncertainties in the evidence.
• Once a draft has been agreed by the group, the material will be circulated to a wider group of experts for peer review.
• After peer review the material will be made available to the public via the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor’s website along with the names of the group and peer reviewers.
• The PMCSA will be available to brief a cross-party parliamentary group.


June/July 2019 Terms of reference uploaded onto PMCSA website
August 2019 Membership of panel published
13 December 2019 The final summary of information will be submitted to the PMO
End January 2020 Likely release date



Chris Fowlie is the CEO of Zeacann Limited, a medicinal cannabis producer; serves on the executive of the New Zealand Medical Cannabis Council; is president of the National Organisation for the Reform of Marijuana Laws NZ Inc; co-founder of The Hempstore Aotearoa; resident expert for Marijuana Media on 95bFM; blogger for The Daily Blog, and court-recognised independent expert witness for cannabis. The opinions expressed here are his own.


  1. Plant series – I think other episodes are available on YouTube, but need to be searched for.

    I am convinced that raw, flowers of the sacred plant would heal me of the considerable pain I’ve experienced for decades due to Multiple Sclerosis. Too many NZers are abysmally ignorant of the great benefits of cannabis to many ill of all ages. The referendum is in danger of being lost by those who ARE KNOWLEDGEABLY INFORMED due to the biases of the ignorant. I am almost sad to acknowledge that much of the best research has been/is done in Israel.

  2. National Party spokesperson Bennett dropped a clanger on Breakfast last week and recognised that research showed legalising cannabis doesn’t increase youth use but quote “Doesn’t decrease it either”. Sounds pretty benign then, cannabis sitting on the spectrum somewhere between not habit forming and not habit forming. Full legalisation (open, anonymous access and use perhaps via a dispensary, cafe or a personal pot plant, versus getting middled by a government clinician) will take the product out of the hands of pushers and pimps for one, and also free up police to catch the real baddies.

  3. Just reading your headline leaves me in no doubt, once again, it’s the boomers! Oh and a few health professionals jumping up and down on the
    sidelines. The conservatives once again want to stop all fun in life and return all effort to the economy. Bloody damn old bastards can’t keep their big gobs shut. What do they know about smoking weed. Zilch.

  4. That is fantastic news, cronies like Hoskins will again be exposed as the liars they truely are. Unfortunately, for their audience 30+ years of state sponsored brainwashing will negate any facts – facts seem to be irrelevant to this group because they view this as a “morale” issue and will vote with their ”conscience” regardless of the facts.

    I recently when to a public lecture by the neuroscience educator Nathan Wallis who contradicted Paula Bennett’s every utterance and was 1000 times more concerned about the damage alcohol does to the development of the brain in people under 25!

  5. Is the MSM culpable for deaths from synthetic drug use?

    Given the MSM’s obsession with calling these deadly drugs “synthetic cannabis”, its no wonder that a Professor beginning a new study into the deadly toxicity of synthetic cannabinoids says “people are thinking it’s just another kind of cannabis but it’s not; it’s a chemical made in a lab sprayed onto plant material” .

    We must therefor be very vigilant and vocal at calling out the MSM’s reckless disregard for public safety in their deliberate attempts to muddy the waters in the buildup to the cannabis referendum.

  6. Great words Chris. Ignorance, fear, hypocrisy and lies have hindered sensible debate and clouded the minds of many who are uninformed. Lets hope the public listens to and understands the Panel over the FamilyFirst harmful lies.

  7. Last week we were confused once again by disinformation/misinformation divide. The pattern so far seems to be progressive research from Europe, and a little more from Australia,coupled with a negative bias from NZ due to narrow parameters of research and the clear bias of the researcher being a chemist and not a botanist or herbalist. Her opinion on the use of cannabis for the treatment of chronic pain flies in the face of ALL overseas research even that from the States. But this chemist from Otago Uni is the one NZ First , National the Police and all the other wowsers will use. You need to be aware Chris.

Comments are closed.