GUEST BLOG: Maire Leadbeater – 60 Years of diplomatic relations with Indonesia: black marks on the record card

By   /   February 27, 2018  /   2 Comments

TDB recommends Voyager - Unlimited internet @home as fast as you can get

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has a snazzy theme to promote the 60th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations with Indonesia: ‘60 years as friends for good’.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has a snazzy theme to promote the 60th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations with Indonesia: ‘60 years as friends for good’.

I’m all for friendship with the Indonesian people, but the diplomatic relationship has been badly marred over the years by our complicity and silence in the face of a long list of human rights crimes.  The 24 year Indonesian occupation of East Timor is a well-known example, but there are other egregious examples including  the matter of the 1965 massacres, when the ‘New Order’ regime set about killing half a million people accused of  ‘communist sympathies’.  New Zealand officials were well-informed about the scale and arbitrary nature of killings,  but they welcomed Suharto’s rise to power and one diplomat told a  1967 parliamentary committee that the transfer of power had been ‘surprisingly peaceful’.   At that time New Zealand’s diplomatic representation in Jakarta was upgraded from a Legation to a full Embassy.

New Zealand’s diplomatic relations with Indonesia began in 1958 when Dr A. Y. Helmi, Indonesia’s Canberra based Ambassador,  was accredited to New Zealand, and in 1961 New Zealand’s Colombo Plan office in Jakarta was upgraded to a Consulate General.   Back then there was a strong focus on New Zealand aid – especially educational and technical training support.

One of the first clouds on the horizon came in 1960.   The future of Netherlands New Guinea, as it was at the time, was at a crossroads. The Dutch were preparing the territory for eventual independence, but Indonesia was insisting that it should be incorporated into the Indonesian Republic.  The other half of the New Guinea island –today’s Papua New-Guinea- was administered by Australia under UN mandate.  New Zealand’s Prime Minister, Walter Nash, put forward a proposal that the two halves of the New Guinea Island should be placed under joint trusteeship and prepared for eventual independence as one country.  Nash put forward his initiative in The Hague in May 1960 and this prompted a trip across the Tasman by Dr Helmi.  Declassified reports show that Dr Helmi’s attempt to sway Mr Nash from his position wasn’t successful. Nash said that the people of New Guinea might need more time to get ready, but one day, like people everywhere, they would want to be independent.

Nash underestimated the forces against him – the United States and Australia had come to the conclusion that Indonesia mattered more to them than the people of West Papua,  and were quietly letting the Dutch know that they would be on their own should Indonesia carry out its threats of force.  But he was on the right track and over the years Papuan leaders have often upheld the idea of one united country: ‘from Sorong to Samarai’.

Unfortunately, New Zealand soon fell into line, burying its qualms about the way the 1962 US brokered ‘New York agreement’ handed the territory to Indonesia on a plate.   Our Ambassador observed part of the subsequent 1969 so-called ‘Act of Free Choice’, and described a stage-managed process, but his critical report did not prompt any action.  During the UN debate that followed, New Zealand stayed silent, leaving it to newly independent African nations to speak up for the West Papuan people .

New Zealand acquiesced to Indonesia’s 1975 invasion of East Timor and helped Indonesia to cover up subsequent crimes even as the death toll approached  200,000. Three New Zealanders died in East Timor at the hands of the Indonesian military or militia during the Indonesian occupation:  photo-journalist Gary Cunningham in 1975, human rights activist Kamal Bamadhaj in 1991 and peacekeeper Leonard Manning in 2000.  Notwithstanding, New Zealand has worked hard to develop and maintain a close bilateral relationship with Indonesia – and because the military is so influential in Indonesian affairs that has included defence ties.  Military training ties were suspended in 1999 after the cataclysmic violence in East Timor but resumed again in 2007 in the absence of any indication that the military had changed its spots or been held accountable for its crimes in East Timor.

Sadly, this is very much an ongoing issue as New Zealand says as little as possible about Indonesia’s ongoing crime of ‘slow genocide’ in West Papua.  In January it emerged that dozens of children of  the  Asmat tribe had died of measles exacerbated by widespread malnutrition. The Asmat,  famed for their elaborate carving and wood sculptures, struggle to preserve their way of life and diet against the predations of forestry, palm oil plantations and mining. Yet they live, metaphorically speaking,   in the shadow of the Freeport  McMoran gold and copper mine, Indonesia’s largest taxpayer.

The Papuans are calling for their right to self-determination to be respected but for successive New Zealand governments that is an ‘s’ word, never to be uttered for fear of offending Indonesia.   Sixty years yes, for good – hardly.


Maire Leadbeater is one of NZs leading human rights activists. Currently her focus is the human rights abuses in West Papua.

Want to support this work? Donate today
Follow us on Twitter & Facebook


  1. On 21st September 1962 New Zealand voted to invade & occupy West New Guinea under authority of General Assembly resolution 1752 (XVII). Within eight days Pakistani troops were on the streets of Hollandia with guns, and six months later the UN asked Indonesian troops to assume the occupation & administration of the colony.

    Although New Zealand and the UN General Assembly has a political option to decide to invade & seize control of any territory under article 85 part 1 of the Charter of the United Nations; neither New Zealand nor any other nation has a right to disregard our legal obligation article 85 part 2 of informing the Trusteeship Council about that UN invasion/trusteeship of a colony.

    In hind-sight it is obvious the UN Secretary General Dag Hammarskjold was killed so he could be replaced by Indonesia’s friend U Thant who helped Indonesia orchestrate and conceal this United Nations trusteeship. Hammarskjold was killed in 1961 just eight days before he could speak in support of the Dutch application for a normal UN trusteeship of West Papua – but he was killed and a “special United Nations trusteeship of West New Guinea” was proposed at the next General Assembly in 1962.. Why ‘special’, because the new Secretary General would not tell the Trusteeship Council and therefore the TC could not begin making the legally required (Charter article 87 & article 88) reports about the “progress” of West Papua towards “self-government or independence” as required by article 76 of the Charter.

    Although it is always illegal to slaughter people & loot a colony, U Thant was able to give Indonesia and its mining friends (Freeport mining) effective free-license to kill & loot in this colony because the UN Secretariat refused to put the issue of General Assembly resolutions 1751 & 171 on the agenda of the Trusteeship Council as required by the UN Charter… The result is that hundreds of thousands of innocent people have been murdered and Hundreds of $billions have been looted from the colony while New Zealand and other UN nations remain complicit by also refusing to put the missing items of General Assembly resolutions 1752 & 171 on the agenda of the Trusteeship Council.

    It is shameful that Australia and New Zealand have been complicit in this UN occupation and violation of UN Charter protocols (articles 85 part 2, article 87, article 88, and article 76) instead of helping our friends in Washington resist the illegal manipulation by their Cold-war banker Robert Lovett who wanted West Papua’s gold & copper and who could only get the wealth with an Indonesian mining license because his Rockefeller business partners had been illegally concealing discovery & survey of the mineral wealth from the Dutch & Papuans since 1936.

    • Sam Sam says:

      The US has been giving Indonesia aid for years including providing money, military supplies and training to the Kopassus which has been responsible for numerous serious human rights abuses – including killings, enforced disappearances, and torture – since the 1990s.

      In the 2000’s Australia gave aid in the form of white Toyota vans, a documentary was done on them because suddenly white vans just showed up and disappeared Indonesians.

      Unfortunately for West Papua they are to poor to resist and too rich to leave alone. The way to deal with this situation is known. We’ve dealt with this type of situation in East Timor, with the right planning and resourcing we could do it again, even go it alone.