Similar Posts

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 Comments

  1. Crickey, a lot covered in the posting. In regard to energy creation and consumption the fact of the matter is the world now relies on fossil fuels, hydrocarbons, and has done since illumination was revolutionized by kerosene, since the combustion engine, since power /electricity now underpins industrial processes. Add to that the plastics and fertilizers linked to hydrocarbons and the reliance is even greater – with a myriad of implications. Science knows this. Share markets know this. Governments know this. Not everyone on the street knows it but a good few do. And of course many of these are in denial. Too much vested interest. Too much at stake.

    I get it. Understanding the gravity of the situation is one thing, finding a solution even harder. Renewables is of course a good start but really only a drop in the ocean. A good thing that oil is no longer burned simply to generate electricity- well, in some countries that is so, although natural gas is still widely used.

    Demand for power/ energy/ elecriticy increasingly grows and renewables cannot fill the need. EVs and solar panels go only so far to solving the problem. Nuclear? The lessons of the past have for once made humans very cautious.

    Then there is distrubtion and cost of energy. Who has access, who pays and how much? Another problem to grapple with. The situation in NZ is diabolical and governments of all hues seem unwilling to face the issues. Perhaps the model is now just too complicated to grapple with, short of social revolution. The same could be said of the wider economic model. Nothing short of a paradigm change and social revolution. Incremental change – fiddling around the edges – may buy some change but how much time do we have. I mean humanity. Although the science predicts the fallout with not be the same everywhere. That said, we’ve seen from the Hormuz crisis that one intervention in the system has implications for everyone locked into the system.

    But not only the generation, disribution and cost of energy are implicated. Shifts in agricultural models are harder to implement, despite the green shoots we often see in Country Calender. Fonterra, Monsanto and the like are not changing their practices any time soon.

    I probably won’t live to see any real changes. Not unless it all goes belly up in the next few decades and we begin to live in the dystopian futures that many have written about. And even that may be some time coming, hardly perceptable in the slow motion of time.

  2. Agree Martin but would add we need a Windfall tax when companies make Windfall profits at most people expence .For example oil companies are making record profits from increasing fuel cost .Or banks or Supermarkets that keep increasing fees or retail prices of the nessitatiies of life while making record profits