Home Blog Page 1736

E tū disappointed with Cadbury closure; hopeful of some continued production

0

E tū says it is extremely disappointed though not surprised by Mondelez International’s decision to close the Dunedin Cadbury factory.

Neville Donaldson, E tū Strategic Director Food says the closure will mean hundreds of job losses and is a bitter blow for its members at Cadbury, and for Dunedin itself.

“This is a sad day for those loyal, high-performing workers who will lose their jobs. It is also bad news for the people of Dunedin. These are high-value jobs, and an export business which is disappearing,” says Neville.

“Although much has been made of a current jobs boom in Dunedin, these jobs, if they exist, tend to be part time and minimum wage.”

However, Neville says Mondelez has said it will consider future production of some key Cadbury lines, which offers some hope.

“We take some comfort from the fact that Mondelez has agreed to take part in a working party which will look at options for continued processing in New Zealand for the local market.”

This includes iconic favourites such as chocolate fish, Jaffas, Pineapple Lumps and some marshmallow products.

Neville says it is envisaged this would involve a co-operative or new manufacturer working under contract to Mondelez. Any jobs created through this venture would be offered first to redundant Cadbury workers with the necessary skills.

Neville says Mondelez will work with key partners in Dunedin on a business plan.

The working group includes E tū representative, Neville Donaldson; the Mayor, Dave Cull; the CEO of the Otago/Southland Employers Association, Virginia Nicholls as well as a political representative and members of Mondelez management.

Neville says the group will co-opt expertise as required “so the plan is properly evaluated and put together.

“We look forward to working with Mondelez to identify a viable business plan which will create or retain employment as well as use the skills of this loyal and long-serving group of workers.”

Neville says there will be additional jobs with the current redevelopment at Cadbury World, which will also be offered in the first instance to redundant workers.

E tū would also like to acknowledge and thank the community for their support and actions taken in support of Cadbury workers.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

DAILY BLOG EXCLUSIVE: Auckland Housing Crisis Special Investigation – Homeless using after hour Bunnings Carparks as home

24

EXCLUSIVE INVESTIGATION BY Ruby Joy

Starting out on this blog, I intended to look into Millennials on the move, escaping the rent trap and redefining the “good life” from home on the range, to home on the road.

Armed with Google and the #vanlife, my search took me through the highs of the movement to a community of inspiring vehicle dwellers, tiny house builders, shared-space organisers, off-grid homesteaders, environmentalist communities, and YouTube celeb status stealth campers. Butut beyond these highs was a great number more lows for everyday people.

There I found families in cars too afraid to get help, fearing Child, Youth and Family would tear their family apart for the lack of a stationary roof. Here were inimum wage or part-time employees having to choose between a car or a home: between gas or food or rent.

Beyond the innovative and inspiration of this community is something else that’s more important.
I avoided anything #vanlife while searching as it seemed to paind over and somehow soften the hard edge of suffering of a much larger group of cara-dwellers whose photos were less than “Instagram-worthy”.

I settled on the study of ’Walmart City’, a nationwide community of vehicle dwellers sleeping overnight in Walmart carparks in the US. Sure the conditions these people lived in were far less than ideal and Walmart – as the exemplar of the job-chewing corporation – has a big part in the problem. But I could also see that it also provided a safe place for people to sleep, cook, eat, wash etc without harassment from security or law enforcement.

Kind of the equivalent of not kicking you so much when you’re down that you lose the ability to be useful to them at all.

Coming back home,, I started to look at New Zealand vehicle dwellers and found a disproportionate amount of airtime given to the #vanlifers – and next to nothing for the larger group of poverty-stricken New Zealanders not living,rather just surviving in vehicles.

This is not to criticise or detract from the awesomeness of #vanlife (which provides a some sort of answer to the problem of povertybut I can’t be complicit with the medias use of #vanlife to cover over the more pressing issue of New Zealanders struggling quite literally in our streets.
So who are these people? Are they lazy, uneducated, unskilled? Do they struggle with gambling addiction, crime or mental health issues? Unemployment and financial mismanagement? Are they driven by loan sharks and the foreclosure of homes? Or simply trying to feed too many mouths on welfare?

Short answer to these question, no. But talking to this community I learnt that the main reason for their vehicle-dwelling was the huge gap between wages and rent. There were also some who couldn’t afford to study because part-time work didn’t cover expenses. Or when student loan repayments took just a little too much out of their low wages for them to have enough to rent a home.

These people were mostly employed, studying, or had studied.They’d given themselves the magic ticket to a better life qualification (along with a large loan), yet they often found themselves without a job to their chossen field. Instead theyfound themselves on minimum wage struggling to make ends meet.

Attitudes towards WINZ were less than civil with good reason. Fears of children uplifted, the cruel treatment of beneficiaries and the disincentivisaiton by the system towards the often only available low paid or part time work were major factors. Punitive policies dished out for those without a fixed abode seeking accommodation supplement and tax credits meant work and income had become less useful to these people than the limited work they could aquire and the total downsizing of their living conditions.

Basically the consesus was “their help is no help and it costs me more than it pays not just finacially but emotionally and mentally.

WINZ had become for these people a bigger burden to bear than moving into and living in their car.
So these people have a car often have both an education trade or skill and a job and or study but where do they park?

Freedom camping areas are limited, often not in residential or industrial areas where these people’s jobs or education providers are and restrictions relating to self contained certification of vehicles means many are not allowed in these areas anyway.

Freedom camping areas are really designed for travellers to see New Zealands natural beauty, not for citizens to function in a local community.

So I went on a hunt for New Zealand’s Wallmart city. Which large organisations/ corporations parking policies allowed for overnight camping like Wallmart?

Well none actually (officially) butIi did find the closest thing to New Zealand’s Wallmart in Bunnings neighbourly attitude to vehicle dwellers.

Ringing around the stores asking to park my van and sleep in it for the night, Bunnings staff took to solving my problem like any other diy project I might amble into their isle with.

Staff told me where I could park, the best places to park, the most popular places to park throughout NZ and more specifically helped me with information for my search in Auckland.

North, South. East and West Bunnings staff had me covered, they even tracked down the stores without locked gates so I could get out in the event of a fire. They searched for and identified their carparks that happened to be busy or well lit or close to amenities because of neighbouring stores.
Staff seemed to know their carparks as well as their stores and even warned me off certain areas having trouble with break ins or that had Police patrols at the moment. They were helpful right down to suggesting diy projects I might consider for inside my van to make life more comfortable. every store I rung and every person I talked to was helful and offered support without being condescending, judgemental, or pitying.

Following these instructions melded together into a kind of road map, I set out to see the carpark campgrounds for myself. Starting in the North, I set myself up and watched as cars stayed longer than store closing and still more arrived a good hour after the doors shut.

Sure enough as it got darker I saw blue phone lights flashed about visible from the back windows of the cars, one man got out to smoke and stretch his legs, a dog owner let their dog sniff about around the car sand a young woman sat typing in the passenger seat with the glovebox forming a desk for her laptop.

These people were winding down and settling in for the night.

As I made my way out West, East and eventually out South, the numbers of people increased and the sense of community and ease about the location was more apparent.

People were visiting other vehicles or chatting outside and even three people cooking on butane burners with the van door open. Not quite a Bunnings carparks sausage sizzle (you cant walk past without smelling and wanting, if your a carnivor like me) but it fit the Bunnings vibe all the same.

The smell certainly got the attention of a few dogs that like their owners were camped out in the car overnight. I saw a few wet noses sniffing at the crack in the top of the window and thought how quiet they had been for me not to have noticed, they weren’t there barking or whinning.

After my mostly sleepless night people watching from the tinted windows of the cab on my ute, I slurped back some cold coffee and focused now on the morning routine of these vehicle dwellers.

I say morning, but it was 5am and in my world that’s still bloody night time! People were getting cleaned up, dressing, eating cereal packing up bedding and heading off to their jobs, study or other daily activities.

So it’s official, Bunnings is the closest thing we have to Wallmart city, no other large organisation had even allowed let alone encouraged me to sleep in their carparks to be safe when I rang around the main centers of New Zealand. Bunnings however offered me free lodgings and even free wifi in both North and South Island stores and specific information on Bunnings carark camping logistics from North of auckland to South of the Bay of Plenty.

I contacted Bunnings head office to try and find out if this was a policy and why they might be so neighbourly to a mostly moved along community.

In true Bunnings style my request was delt with swiftly by their management and media enquirement team and I received a reply to my email the following day. unfortunatly they would only comment on the Whakatane store as this carpark is the only one advertised online as offering shelter for vehicle dwellers having done so with no problems for 11 years as told to me by bunnings Whakatane staff.
Bunnings sent me this statement…….

Jacqui Coombes, Bunnings General Manager, New Zealand:

“Whilst Bunnings doesn’t encourage people to camp in our carparks, we are aware that over the years a small number of people have parked in our Bunnings Warehouse Whakatane carpark, outside of trading hours. We will continue to work closely with and be guided by the local council.”

Since my investigation, Bunnings took down yesterday their advertising of free camping at Whakatane but they haven’t been able to take it off the RV sites…

 

So really two things from this blog, firstly good on you Bunnings for being neighbourly and letting people doss down for the night (despite this not being policy) and secondly, and more importantly, why the bloody hell is New Zealand getting so unaffordable that an Australian companys carpark is the best help available to a growing number of our people?

Besides replacing our government with Bunnings employees what can we do about it?

 

Ruby Joy is a sex worker activist and writer

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Political Caption Competition

0

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Daily Blog Guerrilla Radio – Johnny Cash – God’s Gonna Cut You Down

3

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

TDB Top 5 International Stories: Friday 17th March 2017

0

5: How Trump’s Vicious Budget Would Hurt Science, Poor People, and the Arts

The president’s first budget proposal eliminates programs aimed at fighting climate change, lifting people out of poverty, and supporting diplomacy.

During his presidential campaign, Donald Trump promised to rebuild an America that had allegedly atrophied under a disastrous Obama administration. Trump was a political neophyte but could make big, vague, shiny promises like an old pro: The border wall would be built, and Mexico would pay for it. America would be great again. The military would win again. On Thursday, in his administration’s budget proposal, Trump showed the country what all of that might look like, and it isn’t pretty—making America great apparently involves massive cuts to the arts and sciences, the State Department, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and other popular programs. In exchange, Trump is proposing a whopping $54 billion increase in defense funding, $4.4 billion more for the Department of Veterans Affairs, and $2.8 billion more for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), $2.6 billion of which goes toward funding that southern border wall.

Vice News

4: Who is really paying for Donald Trump’s border wall?

Tijuana, Mexico/San Diego, United States – Former Mexican President Vicente Fox made international headlines when he tweeted to US President Donald Trump, “Mexico is not going to pay for that f****** wall.”

But beyond the sensationalism over who’s going to foot the bill for Trump’s project – reportedly set to cost as much as $21.6bn, local businesses say they are already paying dearly.

On the Mexican side, shops usually crowded with tourists are empty.

Aljazeera

3:  PROSECUTORS ALLEGE DUBIOUS ISIS-NAZI CONNECTION IN TERROR STING CASE

FEDERAL PROSECUTORS WHO brought terror charges last year against a Virginia man — for buying gift cards for an FBI informant — argued in court last week that Nazi memorabilia found in the man’s apartment was relevant to the case because ISIS and the Nazis share “a similarity in ideology”.

According to a transcript of the hearing, Assistant U.S. Attorney Gordon Kromberg said that the defendant, Nicholas Young, was interested in ISIS and Nazism simultaneously. And as an example of historical Muslim-Nazi cooperation, Kromberg noted that Young, on Facebook, had “liked” Mufti Mohammad Amin al-Husayni, a Palestinian nationalist who supported Adolf Hitler. Last year Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu caused an uproar by claiming that al-Husayni inspired the Nazi Holocaust, an allegation that was widely denounced as untrue by historians.

The Intercept

2: In Stinging Blow to President, Hawaii & Maryland Judges Block Trump’s Second Muslim Ban

On Wednesday, only hours before the Trump administration’s new travel ban was set to go into effect, a federal judge in Hawaii issued a nationwide halt to the executive order, which would have temporarily suspended refugees and people from six majority-Muslim nations from entering the United States. This morning, a federal judge in Maryland also blocked part of the travel ban, dealing a second legal blow to the Trump’s executive order. For more, we speak with Lee Gelernt, an ACLU attorney who presented the first challenge to the executive order on immigration. His argument resulted in a nationwide injunction.

Democracy Now

1: Senate intelligence chiefs of both parties reject Trump wiretapping claim

The Republican and Democratic leaders of the Senate intelligence committee have rubbished Donald Trump’s incendiary claim that Barack Obama placed Trump Tower under surveillance.

“Based on the information available to us, we see no indications that Trump Tower was the subject of surveillance by any element of the United States government either before or after Election Day 2016,” the Republican Richard Burr of North Carolina and the Democrat Mark Warner of Virginia said in a joint statement on Thursday.

The Guardian 

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

The Daily Blog Open Mic – Friday 17th March 2017

4

openmike

 

Announce protest actions, general chit chat or give your opinion on issues we haven’t covered for the day.

Moderation rules are more lenient for this section, but try and play nicely.

 

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Politically, Abortion change rests with NZ First so what does that look like?

22

The need to reform the ridiculous and condescending abortion laws are obvious to anyone with an education and basic reading skills.

Women having to pretend they have a mental problem with a pregnancy to get an abortion is the false compromise that NZ law makers came up with in 1977. Abortion wasn’t  made legal, but the mental health loophole was built in to allow it anyway.

Such gerrymandering of legislation for petty ignorance is beneath us as adults.

So how does it all play out politically? Where are the 4 Political Parties that will decide any change in abortion law on this?

National Bill English is hardcore anti-abortion, has been for years and won’t budge on it. Any National Party MP willing to risk never getting a promotion while English is Leader are ‘free’ to make a conscience vote, but I suspect it won’t really be ‘free’ at all.

Labour – They agree with a change and with Jacinda as Deputy, Labour has the most to gain as an identifiable policy with the wider female electorate. Won’t put an Abortion Bill in the ballot in order to not get distracted from its message of houses and jobs, but expect change if in a position to form a Government.

Greens – Totally in support of law change and very strong support from their activist base for change. Won’t put an Abortion Bill in the ballot for the same reason as Labour, doesn’t want to politicise the dormant but loud pro-life movement, but again expect change if they are in a  position to form a Government.

ACT – His vote won’t matter but Seymour wants reform.

United Future – Hopefully won’t be in the next Parliament.

Maori Party – Conservative on abortion.

MANA – I suspect that Hone will be personally conservative on abortion, but would vote for it or abstain.

But the real decision on Abortion law reform will actually be what NZ First’s position is as they are most likely to be king makers in the next Government, and after touching base directly with Tracey Martin, this is their policy…

What’s our view on abortion legislation?

Abortions should be safe, legal and rare.

We have a policy of citizen-initiated binding referendum, held at the same time as a general election – a policy we have had for 23 years – this is one of those issues for such a referendum. It should not be decided by temporarily empowered politicians but by the public.

We need a 12 to 18 month conversation around this issue and then let the people have their say.

Topics that we would be suggest be associated with this discussion would include: Moving the issue from the Criminal Act to the Health Act, ensuring women get the best possible advice, getting more research into “why” women find themselves needing to seek this service and how can we assist them to avoid having to seek this service.

…so, the most likely outcome for any Abortion Law reform will be a 12-18month referendum.

That sounds delightful.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Mass surveillance of beneficiaries, rape and sexual abuse survivors

11

The ramifications of the mass surveillance of beneficiaries is starting to be understood by the NGOs who are now finding their funding threatened.

Sexual abuse survivors have been exempt for 12 months from spying on their clients, but every other welfare agency must hand over all details of their needy or face funding cuts.

This mass surveillance of beneficiaries is sold as prudent management of taxpayer money, the truth is that it’s being used to punish and bill beneficiaries for anything the Ministry believes is a breach.

The insanity of National’s mass surveillance policy was spelt out by Bill English last month when he was trying to explain the explosion of desperate people being housed in Motels. Bill said the policy was flushing beneficiaries out who attempted to escape Government agencies because they fear the agencies. 

Tick, tick, tick.

Annnnnnnnnd what do you think the end result of this policy to take beneficiaries details will be?

People who know their details will be sent to the Government will do all they can to avoid seeing those services in the first place! That will lead to fewer numbers being seen! Which will lead to a reduction in budgets! Which will lead to the Government claiming another victory!

That’s 4 exclamation marks! Make it 5.

We see the exact same rhetoric used and repeated by lazy mainstream media when it comes to beneficiary stats. The Government trumpet that they’ve moved 50 000 off solo parent benefits, yet they can’t tell you where they’ve gone.

Abusing the privacy of the weakest and poorest amongst us while pretending that such abuse is for their benefit is fucking Orwellian.

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Water for New Zealanders!

20

I’m sorry, but god damn this water issue has me furious.

How the hell can we have gotten to a place where large corporations are taking hundreds of thousands of litres of our freshest water PER DAY for free?

HOW?

Brothers and Sisters, this is madness. Pure, unadulterated madness.

The Government’s inane position is that “No one owns the water”. That’s the very answer Nick Smith gave an exasperated Paddy Gower as Paddy put to him these companies were making a killing hocking off our water.

“No one owns the water”.

That’s just horse shit.

Or cow shit, whatever the stuff is that National are allowing Fonteera and corporate dairy to pump into our rivers and streams.

So National sell state assets, (with sweetheart deals for those rich enough from the tax cuts to buy the shares) to subsidise Dairy irrigation to the bloody tune of $400million, they then pollute our rivers to such a point the Government have to redefine what the word ‘swimmable’ means and now National are allowing foreign interests to steal water for free.

Screw this.

Fellow New Zealander’s. This. Must. Not. Stand.

Under the Treaty of Waitangi, New Zealander’s, in partnership with Maori, own the water!

We do.

Us.

We.

You and I.

New Zealander’s.

Maori.

Kiwi’s.

Us.

We own the bloody water thank you very much!

All of us. Not just the bloody farmers and their insane influence over politics, not just the foreign interests and corporations.

Us.

All of us.

If the product is being made and finished here in NZ by a NZ owned company, then they can have access to our water, and I mean ‘access’, not ever increasing intensification, those industries should be looking to clip their wings and reduce their environmental footprint, not greedily expand it even more.

I don’t care how many times Fonteera play those glossy over produced astroturf adverts designed to generate a sense of authenticity with a former All Black gushing about how much he loves milk, they can fuck right off.

You’ve had 9 years of your Party in power and it’s been as detrimental to the environment as the Housing crisis has been to the poor living in cars.

Our environment urgently needs a change of Government because these bastards can’t help themselves. Corporate Framers are addicted to producing mountains of milk powder and screw the knock on effects on the environment.

I say ENOUGH. Water for New Zealanders!

We need a commitment from the Opposition that there will be an immediate moratorium on all foreign interests taking water including the existing contracts.We need to prioritise the water needs of the environment and people first and then business second.

This must be an election issue or we are a nation of short-sighted fools.

If you agree – share this on social media.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Super vs tax cuts – what’s affordable?

10

The super debate hasn’t been super. It has missed the most important issues. The government has tried to focus on misleading measures of financial affordability in 2040, in an attempt to position themselves as responsible. But the real issues are about fairness and equity, across and within generations.

New Zealand’s superannuation scheme, universal and indexed to the average wage, has been world leading. Poverty amongst older citizens has been virtually eliminated. NZ Super has become a vital safety net. Around 40 per cent of pensioners rely solely on NZ Super for their retirement income, and for a further 20 per cent, NZ Super makes up 80 per cent of their income.

But this social protection is eroding rapidly. Future generations will face a far more difficult future. The main game changer has been housing. A house now costs around five times salary compared to two-and-a-half times during the 1990s, and home ownership rates have plummeted. While it is still high for senior citizens, increasing numbers of senior citizens are struggling with rising housing costs, as well as bearing the brunt of under-funding of the heath system.

House price speculation has been driven by a tax system that currently loads the tax burden onto wage and salary earners, and gives tax breaks to landlords. Property owners are able to borrow high levels of debt, get a tax free deduction of the interest payments, and pocket the tax free profit on the sale of the property. This skews the system to favour the wealthy and make it impossible for most young people to buy their own home.

The tax system worsens inequality. Over the past two decades, most of the economic benefits have gone to a small proportion of the population, and inequality in New Zealand has widened sharply. The Green Party will introduce a Capital Gains Tax to make the tax system fairer and reduce the burden on lower income earners.

The current system is also unfair across generations. Raising the age of entitlement to Super continues the irresponsible approach of the Baby Boomer generation who have loaded the costs of education onto younger people and charged them interest on student loans. They/we have priced housing out of the reach of most young people and left huge debts for climate change and ecological damage. Younger generations will find it more difficult to accumulate savings and will be less likely to own their own home. Now the government proposes that they will have to work longer until retirement. It is unjust.

The higher age will also further delay retirement for manual workers, many of whom have had a lifetime of physical labour, as well as Māori, who have a lower life expectancy. Many other older people are willing and able to work for longer. A more flexible system is needed, not just pushing out the age from 65 to 67 years old.

Whether or not NZ Super is affordable is a question of priorities. It is not affordable if the government cuts tax on higher income earners, as they did in 2010. This government has already started talking up another round of tax cuts. NZ Super was more affordable in 1982-86 when the top tax rate was 66%. That meant that two thirds of the NZ Super came back to the government. But now the top tax rate is 33%, more of the benefit is going to those who need it the least.

We need a vision for superannuation in the future. For example, it is likely that there will be more automation and fewer jobs, and serious disruption as a result of climate change. Many more people may be entering retirement with few savings and no job prospects in the later years.

We can afford to maintain the age of eligibility at 65 years old, if we make the right choices. We need to change the policies that have driven inequality over the past two decades. Instead of weakening old age support, the Green Party would like the superannuation system to become a foundation for building stronger social protection across society and extending universal benefits.

Barry Coates MP is Green Party spokesperson on Senior Citizens, Commerce and Consumers Affairs, Trade and Investment, Arts and Culture and Gambling. He is a list MP based in Auckland.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

America’s crazy war in Yemen

2

The first casualty of war is the truth. That’s certainly true of America’s war on Yemen.

In January US Navy Seals raided the Yemeni village of al Ghayil killing around 25 people, including at least five women and 10 children. Yet all most Americans know about the raid is that one American commando, Ryan Owens, was killed. Owens was lauded by Donald Trump in his February address to Congress, with the cameras focusing on his grieving widow, Carryn. The ever-patriotic American media claimed that this was moment Trump became truly presidential.

Actually, the raid was a disaster in all respects. The war in Yemen is a many-sided conflict, with three main players: the Houthi-led administration that controls north Yemen and the Saudi-backed forces, and Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, both of whom control territory in the south.

Men in the village of al Ghayil were paid by the Saudis to resist the Houthis, who control territory just north of them. So by killing those men the SEALs were killing their allies, because America supports the Saudis. There is evidence that Al Qaeda fighters may also have been present in al Ghayil.   Some villagers also sympathise with Al Qaeda, on the grounds that they are taking on their main enemy, the Houthis. It gets very confusing in a three-sided conflict.

Iona Craig of the Intercept travelled to al Ghayil to interview the villagers. She reports that when the SEALs opened fire at 1am in the morning, the locals mistakenly thought it was the Houthis invading and returned fire.

“The gunfight had lasted the better part of an hour. It would be another hour or more before the skies fell silent and the sound of helicopters, aircraft, and drones faded. It was in the dawn light that the mass of bodies was revealed, the missing accounted for, and dead children identified.”

One of the unlucky ones was Abdallah al Ameri, who was the groom in a December 2013 wedding ceremony which was attacked by US drones, killing 12 guests. Abdallah survived on that occasion, but was killed in the latest raid.

US drone strikes have continued over south Yemen through February and March. They are both murderous and counter-productive. Iona Craig reports that such raids have made the villagers in al Ghayil angry with the American government and “that dog Trump”.

It is shameful that the New Zealand government supports the American/Saudi war on Yemen, which is causing such suffering. The UN reports that 7,700 people have been killed so far, including 1500 children. Millions have been displaced, primarily as a result the Saudi bombing of homes, hospitals and other infrastructure. It is a catastrophe.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

GUEST BLOG: Willie Jackson – Raising the retirement age isn’t fair

1

Lot of talk this week that we need to raise the age of retirement to 67.

The argument is that we can’t afford Superannuation at 65 for everyone so we should raise it to be ‘fair’. But who exactly is that being ‘fair’ to?

It isn’t ‘fair’ to the working class of NZ who have worked physically demanding jobs, their bodies ailing and stressed, surely they deserve some reward for the hard work they have put in for their families. Adding two years until they can retire isn’t right.

It isn’t ‘fair’ to the Millennials and Gen-Xers who on top of paying for their own education and saving for their own retirement would now have to wait an extra two years before they retire. It isn’t ‘fair’ to the Baby Boomers who are now being blamed for this policy.

And it isn’t ‘fair’ to Maori and Pasifika who have lower life expectancies. Some are suggesting that retirement should be lowered for Maori but that’s a cop out because it simply accepts Maori will die earlier and we should never reward that. What we should be demanding surely is key investment in policy areas like heath.

In 2006 a survey that covered 10,000 kiwis conducted by Professor Peter Davis from Auckland University confirmed this and showed that we were living eight to nine years less than Pakeha. However the answer to our problem is not giving up and asking for the pension early but rather keeping the pressure on political parties to better resource our needs particularly in that health area.

So the only one raising the Super age is ‘fair’ for is the Government who don’t want to pay for superannuation.

This isn’t an issue of affordability or ‘fairness’, this is an attempt to start rolling back one of the last universal benefits we have. By turning this into a generation war, we are all missing who actually benefits from this, a Government who doesn’t want to accept their social obligations.

Why do we have Superannuation? We have it because we all collectively agree that there is more to life than simply working. After a lifetime of being a decent hard working kiwi, you deserve the opportunity to retire and spend time with whanau and the pursuits you put off because of needing to work.

Pushing the retirement age up would negatively impact Maori, Pasifika, working people and every Gen-X and Millennial in the country. That’s not a solution, that’s taking everyone’s right away to enjoy their retirement.

What we need to do as a country is recommit our pledge to give workers the space to live their own lives in retirement while ensuring that our young people are given the same level of support as they are growing up. Such a vision demands that we stop looking at people as a cost to the state and see them as an investment that the state has an obligation to support.

 

First Published in the Manukau Courier  

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

GUEST BLOG: Arthur Taylor – Is Public Safety being endangered by Parole Board/Corrections Failings?

7

 

Arthur Taylor is The Daily Blog’s Prisoner Rights Blogger who is currently serving time inside prison.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Political Caption Competition

2

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Daily Blog Guerrilla Radio – Footrot Flats – You Oughta be in love

0

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

STAY CONNECTED

11,996FansLike
4,057FollowersFollow

Foreign policy + Intel + Security

Subscribe | Follow | Bookmark
and join Buchanan & Manning LIVE Thursdays @ midday

MIL Public Webcast Service