Similar Posts

10 Comments

  1. I like Genter and Hughes. They could be co-leaders in the future. Smart, know their portfolio’s like the back of their hands and as far as I can tell engaging with people.

    Met Eugenie over issues to do with Canterbury water. She does not have a big profile, but she is a policy wonk as you say and needs to be there. Gharahman sounds promising – she was in a brief Amnesty International spiel on the N.Z. section website. The others look interesting, and the ethnic diversity is good.

    On the downs, I think I prefer Russel Norman – shame he went to Greenpeace.

    Unlike the behemoth who lords over my electorate and is a former woodwork teacher.

    The bigger problem for the Greens might be persuading my party that Black-Green 2017 can really be a thing.

  2. Eugenie Sage should certainly be ahead of Chloe Swarbrick and I would place Hayley Holt ahead of her as well as she is much sharper.
    Third place in the mayoralty is not really a big deal, especially with no green big ideas.

  3. Eugenie Sage should certainly be ahead of Chloe Swarbrick and I would put Hayley Holt well ahead of her too.

  4. Anyone who returns the greens to the 200 era of Rod Donald and Jeanette Fitzsimons will get my vote.

    Not those who cosy up to the cycleway loving John Key clones example; – (R Norman) picture standing on a bike alongside J Key on a dug up rail line now a cycleway in Northland last year.) That is not Green.

  5. Without even entering into the matter of my opinion of the Greens, of what use is your list if dear old reliable tory and National Party enabler, Winston Peters holds the balance of power?

    Foghorn Leghorn has repeatedly promised to keep the Greens out of government.

    Maybe you need to be advising the flock to move their vote AWAY from NZ First…

  6. What concerns me (well, in all honesty I’m not concerned because I now know that voting makes no difference and whoever forms the next government will promote slight tweaking of business-as-usual when we are falling off the cliff, and that only extremely radical change will have any chance of ‘saving us’, but I’ll continue my comment anyway) about members of parliament and potential members of parliament is that, by and large, they are scientifically and financially illiterate and not competent to govern.

    Parliament is riddled with lawyers, part-time farmers and failed woodwork teachers etc. who haven’t got a clue how the world works, and haven’t got a clue how close to collapse we are, or are in denial and pretend that ‘positive thinking’ will get us out of the predicament that industrial civilization is.

    Sadly, most ‘green candidates’ are just as locked into ‘The Age of Entitlement’ as members of any other party, just within a more deceitful framework of non-existent ‘greenness’, and think that we can continue to have personal transport via cars, overseas holidays, access to Chinese-made consumer goods, and an electricity grid etcetera, etcetera, none of which are possible beyond around 2025.

    The absolute bollocks that is always on the Green Party website, such as:

    ‘The Green Party will establish a Minister for Manufacturing in Cabinet, to better represent the interests of manufacturers and ensure they thrive.
    This announcement is about creating well-paid, clean-tech jobs for the future, right here in New Zealand.
    Manufacturing innovation is a critical part of our transition to a clean, low-carbon economy.
    For manufacturing to thrive and take advantage of new technologies like 3D printing, we need leadership across the whole sector now.”

    https://www.greens.org.nz/policy/smarter-economy/minister-manufacturing

    or this piece of nonsense:

    ‘The Green Party will incentivise businesses to purchase electric vehicles by making electric vehicles exempt from fringe benefit tax. Lowering the cost of electric vehicles will stimulate demand for electric cars and their charging infrastructure, and create a second hand market for electric cars in a few years’ time when businesses replace their fleets.’

    https://www.greens.org.nz/policy/smarter-economy/business-tax-breaks-clean-transport-options

    or this:

    ‘We’d strengthen Kiwibank so it can properly compete with the big four Aussie banks, and drive them to cut lending rates for all of us, no matter who we bank with.’

    Which means the ‘greens’ support the fraudulent creation of money out of thin air and the charging of interest on that money, and that the ‘greens’ want to reduce interest rates to ‘stimulate’ the economy and give consumers more money to spend on consumption.

    or this piece of utter garbage:

    ‘This bill will ensure that New Zealand governments balance economic opportunity with environmental responsibility. It does this by providing a framework for parliamentary scrutiny of sustainable development…’

    There is no such thing as ‘sustainable development’. And as long as the ‘greens’ keep pretending there is (lying to their members and the general populace) we are absolutely fucked.

    And to cap it all, the ‘greens’ still support the idea of people driving around the country to look at things:

    ‘Establish a community development fund, providing start up capital for ecologically sustainable small businesses and community enterprises.
    Develop domestic tourism and eco-tourism, especially those based in less well known locations’

    There is no such thing as ‘eco-tourism’.

    ‘Green’ policies means yet more looting and polluting of the environment, a required by the completely dysfunctional and thoroughly corrupt political-economic system foisted on us.

    There is not such thing as a ‘clean, low-carbon economy’, except one based entirely on photosynthesis (which was the case before the Industrial Revolution).

    So yeah, go and vote ‘green’ at the next election, feel good about yourself because you voted ‘green’, and continue with the looting and polluting of the planet until you can’t, driving off the cliff at 80km/hour with ‘green’ policies instead off the cliff at 100km/hour under National, because that is what the system requires of you.

    We are still not sure when the collapse that is underway will move into a higher gear but this gives us a good indication it will be between 2018 and 2020:

    https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/brace-for-the-financial-crash-of-2018-b2f81f85686b#.nn4laxsda

    1. Not only that, but they also practice hideous grammar…

      ‘…no matter who we bank with.’

      We all know it should be whom we bank with…

  7. Is this an Auckland-centric list? IMO Eugenie Sage has worked hard and has a strong presence in Christchurch in particular and Canterbury in general.

  8. Re Chloe Swarbrick – you can have all the good policy in the world but if you don’t have inspiring leadership you won’t get anywhere much.
    That’s why you need people with “star power” as that is all most people register of any political party.

Comments are closed.