Greens Welcome Progress On Hard To Recycle And Single Use Plastics, But More Needs To Be Done
The Green Party welcomes progress on the phase-out of some hard to recycle plastics and some single-use plastics, but says…
Most Recent Blogs
-
-
Dave Macpherson: Don’t sound so surprised that sweet f— all has happened with mental health, Andrew!
Seeing Health Minister Andrew Little claim he’s “extraordinarily frustrated” that almost nothing has happened to date with the $1.9B allocated…
-
What you woke morons are missing in the Hate Speech fiasco!
I appreciate you all think you are gaining the power to smite the dirty racists, the dirty misogynists and the dirty transphobes with this hate speech power.
-
MEDIAWATCH: The State censors Newsroom
Prosecuting legitimate journalism exposing horrific abuse of power shouldn’t be celebrated!
-
Challenging hate speech – yes but let’s adapt our existing legislation
I recall feeling pleased back in 1971 when the government passed the Race Relations Act and appointed the first Race…
-
Can NZ First get 5% in 2023?
…I had felt very confident of Labour + Green winning the 2023 election, but the growing list of policy delivery failures in housing, mental health and infrastructure alongside knee jerks like the bike bridge alongside alienating cancel culture hate speech madness opens the door to National + ACT + NZ First = 51%.
-
Political Caption Competition
National Party members celebrating Judith smashing Todd Muller
-
MEDIAWATCH: Tova humiliates Kris in Free Speech interview
This government needs to spend far more time on housing, child poverty, education, welfare, infrastructure, climate change and inequality and far, far, far less time on social engineering vanity projects to criminalise you for word crimes!
-
GUEST BLOG: Ian Powell – Let’s manufacture our own pharmaceuticals
An inadvertent consequence of recent a decision forced upon state drug purchasing agency Pharmac highlights the importance of New Zealand…
-
GUEST BLOG: Bryan Bruce – Should hate speech become a crime?
Let’s be clear about the purpose of the proposed law change. It’s not about restricting freedom of speech. Why? Because…