Rural General Practice Funding Cuts Put Patients at Risk
A proposed change to rural general practice funding could strip critical support from practices such as Katikati Medical Centre, leaving patients with fewer local services and much longer journeys for care.
They’re the ones that would suffer…our elderly vulnerable community who are struggling with pensions, who are suddenly going to have to pay huge amounts of money for fuel to drive to Tauranga.
This was the response of general practitioner Dr Vicky Jones working at the rural Katikati Medical Centre to formal advice from Health New Zealand (Te Whatu Ora) that a proposed new model for funding rural general practices was to take effect on 1 July.
If confirmed it would see her practice reclassified within the Tauranga urban boundary thereby making it ineligible for the rural funding it currently receives.
Owing to a “notoriously” unreliable road, travel to central Tauranga can take 45 minutes to an hour. The absence of public transport between Katikati and Tauranga significantly adds to the accessibility problem.
Dr Jones advises that the loss of its rural funding contract was expected to lose the practice hundreds of thousands of dollars. The consequence would be forcing cuts to hours and services for its nearly 10,000 patients.
Her concerns are in the context of the underlying problem facing rural general practices which is that there has not been a consistent tool for funding them.
Your generosity has the power to change lives. Every contribution—big or small—helps me continue our mission to help make Aotearoa New Zealand a better place for its people. Donate
Rural general practices funding contracts
Health journalist Fiona Cassie broke the rural general practices funding story
The story of this predicament, which included Dr Jones’ above-mentioned response, was broken on 22 April in a paywalled NZ Doctor article by experienced health journalist Fiona Cassie: Rural general practices risk losing funding contracts due to urban reclassification.
There are two funding contracts for rural general practices. Although both are financially critical, the first (with Health New Zealand) is the most influential.
The second is with the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) which is Aotearoa New Zealand’s government-run no-fault personal injury insurance scheme responsible for providing financial and treatment support for injuries.
ACC funding contracts are divided into three separate categories – urban, rural and urgent care.
The criteria for each of these categories are formally independently determined by ACC. However, in practice and after a time lag, they follow changes to the Health New Zealand funding contract.
Using a blunt instrument to determine funding eligibility
The decision-making process for the Te Whatu Ora funding contract centres on what is generously described as ‘negotiations’ under the rather wordy title of the ‘PHO Services Agreement Amendment Protocol’ (PSAAP). PHO refers to Primary Health Organisations.
Health New Zealand’s position is that its current rural funding contract of around $26.5 million will not be renewed from 1 July if a new funding model is approved by PSAAP.
Rural health requires equitable targeted funding for its general practices
Fiona Cassie reports that this new model is being guided by a mechanism called the ‘Geographic Classification for Health’ (GCH). It was developed collaboratively by Otago and Waikato universities.
Developed in 2022 the GCH classifies a number of communities on the edge or ‘commuter’ zones of cities as urban, even though they were previously regarded as rural.
Similarly some practices in communities not previously recognised as rural for funding contract eligibility may become eligible.
On the face of it this seems fair. However, this is an illusion. The problem is that the GCH is a blunt instrument for such decision-making.
It was never designed for this purpose. Consequently the risk of making wrong and unfair decisions is considerable.
Your generosity has the power to change lives. Every contribution—big or small—helps me continue our mission to help make Aotearoa New Zealand a better place for its people. Donate
Snapshot
Hauora Taiwhenua Rural Health Network is a collective organisation to advocate for the health and wellbeing of rural New Zealanders. Under different names it has existed for around 30 years.
In recent years its activities have included publishing the ‘Rural Health New Zealand Snapshot’. It has just published 2026 edition indicates that there are about 43 practices with more than 200,000 patients currently recognised for rural funding that could be classified as urban under the GCH.
Dr Jo Scott-Jones: “a stressful time for practices”
Dr Jo Scott-Jones is a general practitioner and clinical director of the Pinnacle Midland Heath Network (a PHO). Fiona Cassie reports his belief that:
“Katikati is a good illustration of why a blunt use of the unmodified GCH is problematic.” With practices also waiting to hear about the outcome of capitation reweighting, it was a stressful time for practices facing “all this uncertainty”.
Dr Vicky Jones comments that her practice would likely have to cut weekday hours from 6pm to 5pm and drop its 8.30am-to-midday weekend clinics. In her words:
They’ve always made a loss, always, but we’ve kept them going because they are a good service to our community.
Further, Cassie reports her warning that:
The practice’s ability to offer urgent care would also be affected, including time-intensive ACC services such as major wound sutures and fracture management, currently supported through rural funding.
“I just want to emphasise the massive knock-on effect that this would have for our patients.
“They’re the ones that would suffer…our elderly vulnerable community who are struggling with pensions, who are suddenly going to have to pay huge amounts of money for fuel to drive to Tauranga along a road that is notoriously dangerous and slow.”
According to Hauora Taiwhenua Rural Health Network’s survey of rural general practices under-investment was hindering recruitment of new staff and threatening retention of existing staff.
Many are also subject to seasonal population surges with nearly half extending their staff’s working shifts.
Consequences and what the way forward should be
The controversy was also reported in an article by Stuff journalist Mildred Armah (25 April) under the eye-catching headline of ‘Life or death’: Fears patients could lose local care under rural funding review’: Life or death!
The concerns raised by Dr Vicky Jones feature with an additional observation that more patients would be pushed to either Tauranga Hospital or after-hours services further away.
Particularly for low income patients she imagined that this was “…going to cause quite a lot of distress in our community”.
Katikati Medical Centre’s situation illustrates how a “blunt use” of a funding model can be damaging for patients
Should Katikati Medical Centre lose its rural status by being re-classified as urban its eventual financial loss will be around $200,000; a big fiscal hit for a general practice. In the case of the ACC the hit would be even greater; around $300,000.
As Dr Jones described to me practices like Katikati Medical Centre have been given three months’ notice of a ‘maybe’ loss of their funding contracts.
While it would be ‘grand-parented’ for a further 12 months, the uncertainty prevents them from further investing in infrastructure for expanding patient services.
In the case of Katikati Medical Centre, even if ‘grand-parented’, a scheduled loss of the funding contract from Health New Zealand means not proceeding further with its planned fracture clinic.
Health Minister Simeon Brown needs to require fairness and equity to be adhered to in rural general practice funding
What is needed to bring sense to funding rural general practices is two things. First, government recognition that they are underfunded meaning that a larger ‘funding pot’ is established.
Second, using a blunt instrument not designed for this purpose of distributing funding should be discontinued.
Instead more flexible criteria, including availability of public transport and the health status of enrolled patients, should be developed through engaging with rural practices.
Ian Powell was Executive Director of the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists, the professional union representing senior doctors and dentists in New Zealand, for over 30 years, until December 2019. He is now a health systems, labour market, and political commentator living in the small river estuary community of Otaihanga (the place by the tide). First published at Otaihanga Second Opinion.
Wow! Where do I start?
I’d start at a beginning if I could recognize one as being so. Un-funding rural general practice is like taking an unintelligent dislike to ones self so one shoots one’s self in what ever presents itself. Arse? Nob? Foot? Wow ! I have choices!
Find the four now australian owned banksters and ask the same questions; clue. anz, bnz, asb and westpac .
We, i.e us lot are being deliberately sabotaged to force us to offer our necks up as inducements to our new slave masters. Semen brown. You’d better hope we’re never to cross paths. I have spittle and I’m not afraid to spit it.
Don’t expect fairness and equity in anything Simeon Brown does, it is not in his DNA as evidence by the past two and a half years. Add in Brown is not qualified to oversee the health portfolio, perhaps potholes but certainly not health.