Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

3 Comments

  1. Yes we need some entity that has an expectation of quality and integrity and longevity in these things. to control the rabid *demons in their advanced greedy childhood and the pretentious behaviour of those who do little practically and materially, but have found how to make big bucks; rein in this stampeding stock short of the cliff.
    *A demon is a malevolent supernatural entity. (Seems a suitable word for those in the depths of humanity.)

  2. I think Jack has made his/her point that confirms my misgivings about this commenter human or manufactured.
    17 out of 18 comments in the fractured, demented way that undermines the whole point of having public comment has Jack given access here. So you moderators are going to have to bring in rules, like setting up that one commenter can’t put more than 3 comments on one post – that’s my idea and it would cramp my style occasionally but there have to be some rules, freedom of speech is a oxymoron. And let’s have less oxygen given to the moron that crops up too much.

    Bob the 1st and his ilk are usually crisp and precise or try to form a reasoned point, off toward the right they may be but they can be understood and just as aggravating as they want. But too much playing around is insolent and our nation’s political position is grave. Those without mentality to understand should play with their tech toys in their basements or wherever such denizens dwell. I’m not sacrificing my time making a word salad in a fool’s kitchen.

    1. Just a simple rule like quality over quantity would be a good start. We need divergent opinions to understand the range of people’s thoughts, but individuals like Jack don’t contribute anything useful.

Comments are closed.