Similar Posts

7 Comments

  1. Look at the results of John Key gaming the system in Epsom
    Works very well for ACT.

  2. The Epsom scenario is for a party that has to win that seat to be in Parliament (Act being under 5% for many years). That scenario is not relevant here because Te Pati Māori has several seats.
    I can’t see Labour agreeing that it will not contest Te Pati Māori in the Māori seats. For instance is Labour never going to stand again in Auckland Central or National never going to stand again in Tamaki?

  3. It is good to see a relatively quiet contest so far-leave it up to the voters for once.

    Labour has put a bit of loot in though, so it will all be on eventually. A smart LP would have had an eye on 2026 and made a agreement with TPM, who need to be over the 5% threshold to guarantee a Labour/Green/TPM Govt.

    I know a number of LP members and veterans and sadly many have never really accepted MMP despite the evidence that shows they need to.

    1. Te Pati Maori does not depend on the 5% threshold to be in Parliament. Instead it wins the Maori seats. In fact Te Pati Maori wins sufficient seats that it creates an overhang in Parliament. That is, the number of seats Te Pati Maori wins exceeds their percentage of the Party vote.

      1. Well aware of that, thank you for your erudite comment Wayne.

        I make a different point-namely TPM need to get their party vote up to allow the numbers for a Labour/Green/Te Pati Māori grouping to have a chance of taking office.

Comments are closed.