Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

9 Comments

  1. Look, I hate the environmental dgradation done by the global exploiters as muh as anyone. And if we’re serious about doing anything about the environment or climate, we know who the culprits are, who should pay – because you just start at the biggest bank balance and work down.

    But, instead we have those same exploiters devising the solution. And folk getting all emotional about their story and their solution and their actions as if it is proof of anything to do with climate. It’s not.

    The FIRE – Finance Insurance and Real Estate – industry raising premiums at the drop of a hat
    while the property tycoons snap up beachfront real estate and “earthquake prone” buildings
    under their industry devised “resilience” schemes
    and “Net zero carbon” metrics THEY devised
    gaming around in a global system THEY dominate
    is a hallmark of rapacious globalised non-Smithian capitalist Business as USUAL.
    Not proof of environmental apocalypse.

  2. When we are on track to a decline in home ownership to 50%, the issue is important in the sense that banks require insurance on a property before they will lend.

    But does government really want to take over the cost of assisting the sale of property in flood prone areas and assuming the insurance liability?

    Why not look at flood protection systems area by area? And relocation of housing in some of them?

    For mine government would do better to look at earthquake insurance costs, a government owned insurance option where the government claims ownership of the land if they fund a rebuild (much cheaper insurance for the home owner and the government can afford it, because there is the land asset). Or the older occupant couple can get their family home rebuilt as a small build (lower cost of insurance). Or a family home is rebuilt, but the property is subdivided with government able to place a small build on its new share.

    1. What about government buying up the coastal properties for whatever they can get them form, and then using them as rental properties for the poor.   There will be management discrimination and workers and family areas, and small buses to take them to any job they can get, and bring them home to their doors again.   It would be making a silk purse out of a sows ear of housing disasters but it would aid the running of the country and those who are losing out big time on housing now, from both sides.    It would be practical for the present no lordly housing commission or vast future planning, turn it over to Councils who can present go-to plans and methods and lists of interested and needy people who can be helped.  It is as kind as Kiwiland can afford to be in real money, not pie in space terms.

  3. At some point in the future Capitalism will be collapsed by the increasing impacts of climate change.

  4. At some point in the future Capitalism will be collapsed by the increasing impacts of climate change.

  5. At some point in the future Capitalism will be collapsed by the increasing impacts of climate change.

  6. Its a crime that Willson and other good jurnos are behind a paywall so that the average joe does not get to read the real stuff thats going on in the real world not the fiction world of social media .

Comments are closed.