Dr Liz Gordon: MMP, the Alliance and me

16
782

A quarter of a century ago today a young(ish) senior lecturer from the University of Canterbury was elected as a neophyte MP in the first MMP election. It is fair to say she was totally surprised, not to say shocked, by this turn of events.

It was a time of great uncertainty. With the Governor General expressing concern she may need to use emergency powers, and powerful nay-sayers predicting doom, we entered this new era with few rules on how to work such a system.

I was asked on RNZ the other day whether I believed there would be a move back to FPP.  I answered that I could see no sign at all of a desire to change from the current system.

Those of you who were too young in those days, might not remember that the move to MMP was borne of years of unaccountable action by successive governments.  In National (1975-1984) Muldoon practically governed as a one-man band, neglecting areas in which he had little interest and bullying his way through in important areas.  His swansong, the announcement of a snap election while drunk, due to his inability to rein in Marilyn Waring’s vote, reflected that period.

The 1984 Labour Government seemed like a breath of fresh air, but in three years had almost abandoned all the tenets of a Labour Government in favour of free market economic principles. It took a further three years to get rid of that government (nearly destroying the Labour Party in the process).

This was followed by a National Government which seized gleefully on the anti-statism of Labour and extended it.  Promises were broken. Instead of abolishing Labour’s $1250 tertiary fee, Minister Lockwood Smith devolved the ability to set fees to individual institutions.

By 1993 the fervour of neo-liberal reform had begun to burn out. It was, in many areas of society, completely unworkable – the state was needed, and needed to regulate and provide.  The campaign for MMP was built on the need to add checks and balances to governments to ensure that such radical reforms could no longer be pushed through by a tiny minority of people in a government. Also, years of minority governments (more people voted for the opposition, but winning was counted by number of seats alone, and minor parties might get a large number of votes but fail to win a seat) were seen as increasingly unfair.

I should mention here the shining light of Rod Donald, who put everything into the struggle. It was a tragedy when he died so young.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

So there we were, 25 years ago today, shiny-eyed with hope for the future.  The Alliance was an amalgamation of five parties: NewLabour, the Greens, Mana Motuhake, Liberals and Democrats. We were very disciplined in the early days, with a couple of exceptions.

The late Alamein Kopu had virtually no political experience and hated parliament from the first.  Her interests were in promoting te reo Māori and tikanga Māori across all government institutions. She was well ahead of her time (for example refusing to speak English) but was an ineffective MP. Read her Wikipedia page for the full story.

Frank Grover was our other defector in that first term.  The Liberals joined the Alliance as part of the anti-neoliberalism coalition of forces.  He was, politically, of the Christian Right and he hated our leftie social policy framework. He, too, was gone by lunchtime, setting up the Christian Heritage Party which then spawned Graham Capill and his paedophile ways, which effectively destroyed that party from within.

Gosh, I had forgotten how convoluted MMP politics were. NZ First was going through its own splits, of course. ACT has also had its moments and, until recently has struggled to find support.

Labour and National were very keen to ensure their continuation as the ‘major’ parties during MMP.  Thus we have had Labour-led and National-led, before this term’s extraordinary majority Labour government.  The future is uncharted.  We cannot know what the second quarter century of MMP will bring. Will there continue to be ’major’ and ’minor’ parties? Will we become more like Germany, with its myriad voices inside parliament but with a strong democracy?

Without MMP there would be no Kiwibank (Jim A.) and no paid parental leave (Laila H).  There would have been no gold card with its free public transport for those over 65 (Winston P). Along with the good, there is no capital gains tax on subsequent properties.

Such a long time, 25 years. It has taken a long time to get rid of neo-liberal thinking and policies, and it is still with us in many ways. I voted Labour for the first time since 1987 at the last election, which felt like a bit of a betrayal of MMP, but what choice was there? There needs to be a new leftie party in Aotearoa, representing the politics of a fair economy and better society. But I won’t hold my breath.

Happy Birthday, MMP and may your life be long and productive!

Dr Liz Gordon is a researcher and a barrister, with interests in destroying neo-liberalism in all its forms and moving towards a socially just society. She usually blogs on justice, social welfare and education topics.

16 COMMENTS

  1. Back Bench pay is $160k
    That’s a lot of money to poorly skilled workers, people who have lived off benefits, people who have been assistants or researchers on Non Government Organization NGOs (which interfere in political affairs of other countries) or about the same pay for teachers, cops, health workers and other government bureaucrats who have at least reached senior management.
    But, its not a lot of money and as such, the position of MP fails to entice higher ranking and higher government or private sector bureaucrats, or enterprising entrepreneurs or other private sector business people who have risked capital to build their commercial successes and therefore annual revenue streams of in excess of $250k pa.
    $160K is not enough to entice quality people to a job where their career prospects rest in the hands of fickle voters and not the outcomes of productivity which is the reward of enterprising perspicacious private sector performance.
    As a result, the quality of most MPs is pitiful.
    In my view.
    To entice high performers to enter parliament. the pay needs to be $500k with a maximum 2 terms then out.
    Less MP’s is the key better outcomes.
    Committees are talking shops where decisions are rarely made: therefore the less the better.
    60 MPs is plenty. That’s One for about 84,000 voters.

    We disagree Dr Liz – but like you, I wont hold my breath.

    • I’m not sure the pitiful average quality of our MPs is about the money. I think it’s more that we’re a small country, so we’re not going to come up with anything like 120 sufficiently able people. Most of our MPs are plonkers, and that goes for all political parties. I agree we need fewer and better MPs, but even 60 is possibly too many.

    • Ross Meurant. Agree, especially re better pay to attract high calibre people, but whether this is the sole reason for the woebegone bunch who sit in Parliament now, I don’t know – and that applies to all political parties, not just some of the current inadequate ministers.

    • My 2 cents. Always thought the truly intelligent people are blue collar not white. Practical experience combined with paper/computer skills is the best good combo. Highly paid pencil pushers actually know fuck all and fuck everything up all the time. Head hunting these idiots will bring more of the same at higher cost. Just saying.

  2. The concept of MMP wa distroyed by Winston . I hope once he is off the scene it can progress. The 5 Maori Seats need to go as there are plenty of Maori on both sides of the fence to protect the advance of their voice .

    • I agree Trevor

      Maori seats were created same time as seats for Miners – at a point in time when voting rights were predicated on land ownership.
      Miners did not won the land they mined.
      Maori collectively owned theirs.

      When land rights to voting were abolished, miners seats disappeared.
      Maori seats were retained.

      • How exactly are they disadvantaged? And how does segregating them into different electoral roll help them?
        In fact the Royal Commission recommended the disbandment of the Maori seats and it is a terrible shame it wasn’t done.

  3. “It has taken a long time to get rid of neo-liberal thinking and policies …”

    Liz if you think we’ve got rid of neoliberal thinking and policies, I’m not sure you have much understanding of the present political landscape. New Zealand’s mainstream ideology in the 21st century is progressive neoliberalism.

  4. How can we have a democracy when it’s a capitalist democracy because money can, and is, used as a threat and a weapon.
    To understand what I mean see the comments above by the Tweedle Dumb and Tweedle Dumbers.
    They have all the same old answers but not a correct one amongst them.
    And I don’t agree that neoliberalism is no longer with us. I think it’s like any snake. It sheds its skin now and then but it’s still the same snake. roger douglas is well up david seymour for example…

  5. Yes, I remember it well.
    The Alliance was something that had never happened in NZ before, or since.
    It was a coming together of so many different ideologies with one thing in common – giving power back to the people.
    As for MMP.
    It is not perfect, no system ever is.
    But it makes each vote valuable, rather than having only a few tens of thousands of votes in marginal electorates responsible for keeping or changing a government as what happens in FPP.

  6. Parliament is like a cauldron that mixes morally virtuous individualistic people and converts them into a collection of greed filled selfish bastards who understand that enriching the MP collective is all that really matters.

  7. The opposition to the MMP campaign was an opportunity for the business sector to publicly flex their muscle and they were led by the then Chair of Telecom Peter Shirtcliffe via the Campaign for Better Government.
    I remember his rigid and condescending interview style and it only helped to push the referendum in MMP’s favour.
    I agree that we need a true “leftie” party with strong socialist leadership but with a community riven with inequity the majority of people who would support that party are just trying to survive.
    The Labour party chose no CGT or wealth tax which guaranteed an historical victory but left unbridled a property market that has disenfranchised so many and burdened others with eyewatering debt.
    The capitalist/neoliberal financial model is deeply entrenched in the establishment.
    Thank you Dr G for your contribution here and in general.
    It is much appreciated by this reader.

  8. Dr
    You are accurate re Frank Grover

    Caused trouble wherever he went: National Party guru in Hamilton once but was terminate or departed in a fit of petulance

  9. Liz i enjoyed the trip down memory lane when hope, politics and strong policy still had a chance at serving the people well despite the 1984 -93 economic shift from the people to a more corporate profit take no prisoners economic new order that still prevails and effects us today despite a global pandemic and our health system that still has to focus on returning a profit and being run on the tightest of budgets and under investment that Mr Coleman and his predecessors in the National led government oversaw while safe in the knowledge that if they or their family got ill they had unfettered access to private healthcare with their own room and sumptuous menu.

    I became interested in politics at 15 when Muldoon was still dominant and i remember the old NZ pre 1984 but only just. The scale of change has been immense in society and technology since then and despite the economic carnage i embrace the net and the connect i have have with my smart phone and the power that gives me.

    New Zealand today is a foreign country compared to pre revolution and the door is firmly closed on that era and only nostalgia remains and no one can live on that like we once did for so long.

    I remember the excitement i felt in 1991 when i sat in my car in Mt Roskill Auckland and read about the formation of the Alliance. Not since Social Credit had we had a real third party that could shake things up.
    The NLP was there of course and the remains of the Democrats which were the old Soccred and the pitiful remains of the Jones incarnation of freedom and prosperities New Zealand party long since abandoned by its creator Mr Jones and his millions.

    Pre MMP the Alliance showed how by joining forces toward ideas that they had in common but as four independent different parties they could articulate a united vision on using their combined resources to advance a programme that was not on offer by the two free market parties who were interchangeable.
    In other words an alternative to neo liberalism.

    I remember that the Greens were pivotal in joining and that with their reasonable support and reach were much better in the tent than standing outside it and the moment they agreed the Alliance became a viable vehicle for all those on the ” left ” that were excuse the pun were looking for an alternative on the left.

    The Alliance i remember did amazingly well in the by election of 1992 in Rob Muldoon’s Tamaki seat and in other contests in the early nineties. The Labour party had its own real competition on its left flank espousing the policies it had abandoned after 1981.

    It was sad to see its demise after 2001 but the fact they had stayed unified for so long was a testament to the discipline and commitment to offering a real alternative in a neo liberal economic order where there was only National or the slightly sublime LINO of Social Democrats that were the free markets acceptable alternative to the cruelty of its conservative parties worldwide but still maintaining the status quo with the election of Tony Blair and ” New Labour ” in 1997 and Bob Hawke- Keating in Australia.

    I remember Gilbert Myles and Hamish Macintyre leaving National and forming the little Liberal party that Grover eventually led when it joined the Alliance but had nothing of substance to offer.

    I do believe that with the advent of MMP there is room for a social justice movement on the left that could have the potential of being a party of conscience and influence to any Social Democrat governing arrangement that can have more influence than the current Green party or even reform that party with strong Green credentials that can appeal to many millennials who do have in my experience an economic and social conscience for the ideas that the corporate media has done its best to ignore and rail against for the last twenty five years through biased brain washing technique’s and rugged individualism.

    The Green party of Donald , Fitzsimmons , Bradley has long since been absorbed into the free market LINO political direction and i wonder if Chloe has realised this yet.

    We were a proud people once and achieved so much that we can be proud of and can be again if we could just remember that some things are still worth fighting for and i for one would give my whole support and energy to a new political vehicle that can stand and deliver for all those kiwis that have been ignored and taken advantage of by LINO National and all the current parties in parliament.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.