And it begins – the wokewash campaign for a secret police mass surveillance state

By
Martyn Bradbury
-
21
1635

And it begins…

More data surveillance and less privacy? Spy chief says the public must decide

The public must decide if spies should conduct greater data surveillance to identify the next terrorist, Security Intelligence Service director-general Rebecca Kitteridge says.

Six months on from the Royal Commission of Inquiry in the Christchurch mosque terror attacks, Kitteridge wants to have a public campaign, akin to that of the Covid-19 pandemic, to talk about the possible “technology-privacy trade off” and unite New Zealanders behind national security threats.

…I spy with my 5 eyes, something beginning with 1984!

- Sponsor Promotion -

I disagree with Comrade Chris Trotter when he says there is no way to catch a Lone Wolf white supremacist terrorist, what everyone likes to conveniently ignore in the Tarrant case is that the SIS and GCSB did intercept files relating to guerilla warfare tactics, Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri and Nowegian right-wing extremist Anders Behring Breivik, but because there was no secondary intelligence profile like connecting the geographical area of download with complaints from shooting ranges, Tarrant flew under the radar.

We have the capacity to catch these guys by using the existing powers focused differently, not by importing Orwell’s Big Sister!

Which brings us to the Maori Party’s gasp inducing demand to set up a secret police force  comprised of the SIS and the Police Intelligence Unit to hunt down white supremacists.

If any other political party asked to create a secret police force that hunts for word crimes and thought criminals there would be rioting in the street but because it’s the Maori Party and it’s aimed at something we all hate that’s somehow fine?

I read the terrorist’s manifesto and I don’t recall him referring to Trans Allies or gender identity, so why criminalising the misuse of pronouns is being mooted as a response to white supremacy terrorism is utterly beyond me!

It’s particularly galling because the problem wasn’t hate speech laws, the problem was that the entire Intelligence apparatus of NZ didn’t bother doing their job, which is to protect us from the next possible terror threat!

This is the list of the NZ security apparatus, many acronyms you’ve never heard of, who are supposed to keep us safe with mass surveillance powers from this very type of terrorism, and I WILL CONTINUE PRINTING THIS LIST until you start appreciating how enormous a failure this was…

  • The SIS (Secret Intelligence Services)
  • The GCSB (Government Communications Security Bureau)
  • The NSG (National Security Group)
  • The Police Intelligence Unit
  • The CNSN (Cabinet National Security Committee)
  • The ODESC (Officials’ Committee for Domestic and External Security Coordination)
  • The SIB (Security and Intelligence Board)
  • The CTCC (Counter-Terrorism Coordinating Committee)
  • The NICC ( National Intelligence Coordination Committee)
  • The IAD (Intelligence and Assessments Directorate)
  • The NRU (National Risk Unit)
  • The NSPD (National Security Policy Directorate)

…the failure was with that list, that list who cost us over $100million each year to ensure this type of atrocity fuelled by extremism doesn’t rupture and cause mass loss of life!

To fucking pretend that Gender Identity Hate Speech and a secret police mass surveillance state is a response to this abomination of an intelligence failure is fucking dangerous!

Let me be as clear as I can comrades. Don’t get tricked into creating a stasi simply because the enemy they are being set up to hunt is one you like to hate.

We have the tools to catch genuine threats, the Woke want tools to catch people they don’t like. The only ones licking their fangs in anticipation of the extra funding, powers and expansion of their remit are the SIS!

Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.

If you can’t contribute but want to help, please always feel free to share our blogs on social media

21 COMMENTS

  1. I am very angry about this. And genuinely terrified. Has it been muted that not using personal pronouns would be a form of hate speech? That is very scary. Just to set the record straight, I don’t mind uses persona,l pronouns for a. Transgender person, if that’s what they want, no problem. But to compel people to, otherwise it’s hate speech?

    There has been a recent ruling on the case of Maya Frater (think I have her surname wrong), in the UK. She posted on her Twitter account that she believed there are only two sexes and sex is immutable. This is a commonly held assumption and a scientific fact (intersex people most often have xx or Xy). In the last week the Supreme Court ruled that gender critical views (and gender identity), are protected categories. I support both findings. Women who are gender critical are being shut down already.

    The latest Green Party cancel cry is shut down the film they are us and labelling white supremacy that the main focus is on Ardern leadership. I am not saying I am in favour of the film going ahead. The film makers claim to have talked to the Muslim community, but it sounds like there is more talk to do. I would have thought it was too soon. But to label the focus on Jacinda as white supremacy is stupid. The benefits of showing a young women leader who handles such an appalling act so well, surely will be that people in their own countries begin to demand her type of leadership. Ardern did something really significant in terms of uniting the country and showing great compassion for the Muslim people and this should be celebrated

  2. The biggest threat by far is Abrupt Climate Change (Planetary Meltdown).

    What are our ‘security’ agencies doing about it?

    What is ANYONE doing about it?

  3. Perhaps before we have a public campaign to enable the creation of another security agency, we could have one to explain exactly what all of our exisiting ones do.

  4. This effectively boils down to criminalising political dissent. The pretense of a vestigial democracy is gone at that point. If you’re not fully down with the liberal consensus, you are to be deemed an enemy of the state, by those who uphold this orthodoxy as being unassailably morally upright, naturally. But they would say that wouldn’t they. Of course it’s always cloaked as “keeping us safe.” It is amazing how far this country has fallen.

  6. Never ceases to amaze me that people you grew up with and knew, either by way of 2 or 3 degrees of separation and who used to advocate social liberalism have turned out to be right little authoritarians. Often in the image of their parents they used to rebel against.
    It’d be amusing to watch if it wasn’t so serious.
    Thankfully, our elections haven’t yet been compromised so that we still get what we deserve. Think before you vote in ’23 or you won’t know what you’ve lost till it’s gone. The frogs are on the stove set to simmer.

    • Knarf. I think it was Elizabeth Kerekere, Green, not the Maori Party, who said in her maiden speech, that before colonisation, Maori had more gender options or choices or practices, and then came the colonials, and it was likely the colonial missionaries who threw their weight around and reduced the variety or choices or practices involved in having Maori sex, but this too can change – for those who have the time and the energy and inclination to change – and everyone can have rainbow diversity and whatever, without prejudice, discrimination, fear of the Lord, or spies.

      • Preoccupation with gender/ transgender issues warranting a Parliamentary maiden speech from Kerekere, may be more to do with being a member of the Green Party, than Maori – I don’t recall either Mana, or the Maori Party, prioritising gender or sex issues -I think both have been more environmentally and community focused.

  10. Para 2 and 3
    Right on Bomber

    Beware of the words internal security for that is the eternal cry of the oppressor – said Voltaire

    And, say I, invariably the plea of second grade bureaucrats seeking job security

Comments are closed.