The rising rate of rheumatic fever among Māori and Pasifika children is one of the sharpest examples yet of the direct harm caused by New Zealand’s high level of inequality, Peter Malcolm, spokesperson for the income equality project Closing the Gap, said today.
University of Auckland researcher Dr. Julie Spray calls rheumatic fever ‘the canary in the coal mine for inequality’, and her recent work makes clear that unless the root cause — inequality — is addressed, we will be unable to reduce the incidence of this damaging illness.
“As Dr. Spray points out, the current approach to prevention which involves identifying and medicating kids with sore throats, won’t work if they’re simply sent back to the same inadequate housing,” Mr. Malcolm said.
Successive governments have been trying for years to reduce New Zealand’s stubborn rates of rheumatic fever, including the previous National government, and still the rates go up.
“Given the links between this illness and deprivation, overcrowding and poor housing, a medical approach can only do so much. What we need are bold policies, starting with providing good quality social housing, particularly for families with children,” Mr. Malcolm said.
While not usually fatal in itself, rheumatic fever can cause lasting heart damage that kills up to 200 New Zealanders a year.
“We as a society need to take responsibility for the social and economic inequalities that underlie this illness,” he said. “Until we do, more Māori and Pasifika children and their families will be forced to pay an unconscionably heavy price.”
REFERENCES:
‘The Canary in the Coal Mine for Inequality’: https://www.newsroom.co.nz/@ideasroom/2019/05/01/561381/failing-children-with-health-scare-tactics
MOH Rheumatic Fever Prevention Programme: https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/diseases-and-conditions/rheumatic-fever
The national party were trying to reduce rheumatic fever while knocking down our state houses and allowing the land and the houses to be sold to foreigners therefore reducing our housing stock without a plan to replace what they knocked down. So they were actually exacerbating the problem. For some NZers to say they were good economic managers is a load of nonsense good for who and what exactly ?
Comments are closed.