Greenpeace International Executive Director, Jennifer Morgan, says the New Zealand delegation has been “quiet” at the conference, which is at odds with Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern’s bold action earlier in the year to ban new oil and gas exploration permits.
“Because there are so few countries on our side, we urgently need New Zealand to be a champion,” Morgan said from the conference in Katowice, Poland.
“New Zealand must be vocal on supporting the latest IPCC report – which shows we have just 12 years to halve carbon emissions – and support a process to significantly raise our global climate ambitions by the year 2020.”
Morgan has requested a meeting with New Zealand’s Minister for the Environment, David Parker, to raise her concerns.
Speaking at a press event at the conference overnight (NZT), she called on New Zealand to step up and be a climate change champion.
“New Zealand needs to separate itself out from positions of the umbrella group, which includes Australia, Japan, Russia, Ukraine, Canada, the US and Norway,” Morgan says.
“The New Zealand Prime Minister made international headlines with her strong position on climate change and ban on new oil and gas permits. We need New Zealand’s COP delegation to be just as vocal now, while they have the chance on the world stage. They also need to show their empathy with developing countries, including their friends in the Pacific, and commit to financial support to the Green Climate Fund.”
Greenpeace New Zealand Executive Director, Dr Russel Norman, says developed countries like New Zealand must take the lead when it comes to climate action.
“The targets of every country at COP24 need to be more ambitious if we are going to stay within safe global warming. Right now, we’re on track for a three or four degree temperature rise, which would cause mass extinctions and the displacement and death of tens of millions of people,” he says.
“New Zealand was celebrated internationally for taking action and becoming one of the first countries in the world to ban new oil and gas exploration permits, protecting four million square kilometres of ocean from the extraction of fossil fuels.
“Small countries can make big waves. Right now, we have an opportunity to stand in front of the world and champion bold climate leadership. I hope it’s an opportunity our representatives take.”
As the UN climate talks in Poland entered their second week, Greenpeace activists projected a message to world leaders at COP24 demanding urgent action to turn the tide on the worsening climate emergency.
They projected the words: ‘Politicians Talk, Leaders Act’ and ‘No Hope Without Climate Action’ onto the roof of the COP24 venue, the Spodek, in Katowice.
NZ voices not heard.
Over the past 10-15 years there have been innumerable international meetings, workshops, conferences, formal and informal gatherings, large and small sessions, on potential effects of climate change and ways for climate resilience.
There is not a single social, economic, environmental sub-sector that has not thoroughly analyzed and discussed the matter in length, and in most cases conclusions are meaningful. Practical steps for action have been proposed, although many of these can only be seen as temporary measures.
Early warning, so to say.
The ministries, departments, academic institutions, etc. in New Zealand are full of professionals from all walks of life participating in these events.
There must be thousands.
An enormous pool of qualification and knowledge is lying idle.
So far, the accumulated potential of these professionals – across all sectors – has not been able to sufficiently penetrate the political sphere in NZ, certainly not in the beehive.
Very relevant information and analyses provided and disseminated through these international gatherings do not flow down to communities and reach the ordinary kiwi citizen.
It would be a major achievement of the Green Party in parliament, if the members could find ways to unblock the barriers.
Better linkage of climate expertise to parliamentary politics, and assuring proper flow of information through the public sector and the media, e.g. NZ on Air.
Encouragement of seeking options for practical climate resilience, and preparation for future possibilities to come.
Disaster Risk Reduction, so to say.
NZ has two paths it treads.
The first path is reducing our pollution and environmental destruction. This must include population control.
The international component of NZ responsibility is to influence other states to do the same urgently. That may mean not playing ball with those states that continue to destroy the planet.
A third path not yet taken is to form / join a coalition of states who give urgency to reducing population and restoring as much of the damage humans have done so far.
That coalition will have to bite the bullet and play hard ball isolating the criminal states who continue to fuck up the world.
We all know who they are.
Comments are closed.