I’ve got a soft spot for the Hoots, but this really is a shocker on the rocker.
So Hoots, when you were insinuating that David Parker was corrupt – did your mate Key not tell you it was actually him seeking the exemption?
Has John lost your number?
After days of being on the backfoot, the Government has revealed it was Sir John Key who was lobbying for an exemption for a billionaire’s property development in Northland.
Now if I remember correctly Hoots, you were claiming this corruption was bigger than the Saudi Sheep bribe.
So what’s the word? Is this still bigger than the Saudi Sheep deal?
Or is it silence of the lambs?
David Parker is so scrupulously ethical he makes Golriz Ghahraman look like a cis-white heteronormative Trump supporter, so how on earth the Right in NZ managed to believe that Parker would do anything that wasn’t completely above board is utterly beyond me.
Here’s the final word…