Loading...
You are here:  Home  >  Bloggers  >  Julie Anne Genter  >  Current Article

TRAINSPOTTING: The end of car dependency and the future of civilisation

By   /  August 27, 2013  /  5 Comments

TDB recommends Voyager - Unlimited internet @home as fast as you can get

New Zealand is one of the last developed countries to still be throwing a huge chunk of the transport budget at new (or duplicate) highway capacity. It is well established in the literature that motorways do not reduce congestion,

    Print       Email

resilientCities-199x300Last week one of the world’s foremost thinkers and advocates of what I call smart transport, Professor Peter Newman of Curtin University, visited New Zealand.  Newman is currently a member of Infrastructure Australia and was instrumental in the revitalisation and subsequent development of Perth’s commuter rail system.

Newman and his colleague, Jeff Kenworthy, also coined the term automobile dependency, what I have (for shorthand) previously blogged about as car dependence, and published the first comprehensive studies on the phenomenon.

You can listen to an excellent 20 minute interview with Newman that aired Sunday morning on Radio New Zealand.

Newman made several important points in the interview that are worth reiterating here.

Firstly, New Zealand is one of the last developed countries to still be throwing a huge chunk of the transport budget at new (or duplicate) highway capacity. It is well established in the literature that motorways do not reduce congestion, but make it worse. Moreover, new inter-city highways are not the most cost-effective way to reduce transport costs and thereby generate productivity gains.

So, the Government’s roads of significance to National (RoNS) programme is well and truly behind the times, and likely to be a huge waste of money that could be spent on far more important and economically useful transport projects.

The Wellington Northern Corridor is the worst of the RoNS, in many respects, because it will actively undermine the current advantages that the capital has – namely good public transport, walking and cycling.

Secondly, Newman emphasises that the trends are already changing rapidly. Chris Laidlaw, in his interview with Newman, expresses surprise at the fact that vehicle use and car ownership is down and likely to decline even further. Laidlaw is typical of his generation, who may well support public transport on social or environmental grounds, but wrongly believe that we need to fight New Zealanders inherent and immutable desire to drive their own car everywhere.

As I have mentioned before, car dependency is not the result of the market, but of traffic engineering and planning practice that reduces people’s choices. Therein lies an opportunity to do things smarter. But even with continued car-oriented planning and funding, New Zealanders are already driving less.VKTPT

 The indexed graph to the right uses data from Ministry of Transport and shows clearly that vehicle use (vehicle kilometres travelled or vkt for short) has declined from its peak, while public transport use is growing quickly.

This is true in all rich countries. Young people are far less interested in owning a car or using it. They would rather live in a vibrant urban area, and they can use phones or social media to connect while taking a train or bus. Incidentally, this preference isn’t limited to Millennials. Many retired couples are downsizing and moving to more walkable neighbourhoods.

People are already voting with their feet, we just need government policy, planning and funding to catch up.

***
Want to support this work? Donate today
***
Follow us on Twitter & Facebook
***
    Print       Email

About the author

Julie Anne Genter

Member of Parliament

5 Comments

  1. David says:

    It would be great to have people friendly cities and less traffic congestion. I expect that one of the reasons that car use is declining is the increased cost of fuel and the decline in the economy which I know prohibits me from the travel I did ten years ago.

    But changing the govt’s overloaded train of thought will take a great deal of effort to get it to change direction.

  2. YogiBare says:

    These planners seem to ignore the obvious fact that fossil fuels are an finite energy source or, even more worryingly, climate scientists concern that if we actually burn the reserves we have already discovered the resulting temperature rise will make life on this wonderful planet impossible.
    I’m rapidly coming round to Derrick Jensen’s extreme “endgame” view that the only way we can continue living here is if we bring down our global civilisation.

    • Draco T Bastard says:

      climate scientists concern that if we actually burn the reserves we have already discovered the resulting temperature rise will make life on this wonderful planet impossible.

      Well, not completely impossible, just impossible for anything above an amoeba.

  3. Joanna.P says:

    I’m just counting the days til Julie Anne Genter becomes Minister of Transport …

You might also like...

The main issue about Euthanasia that its cheerleaders point blank refuse to engage in

Read More →