Latest West Papua journalist blacklisting another serious violation by Indonesia

By   /   April 11, 2017  /   1 Comment

TDB recommends Voyager - Unlimited internet @home as fast as you can get

The blacklisting of Jack Hewson, a freelance journalist working for Al Jazeera, shows the Indonesian government’s paranoia towards foreign journalists.


Indonesian special police in action against Papuan protesters — still from Cyril Payen’s documentary.

David Robie also blogs at Café Pacific

Analysis by Tempo in Pacific Media Watch

The blacklisting of Jack Hewson, a freelance journalist working for Al Jazeera, shows the Indonesian government’s paranoia towards foreign journalists.

The government should allow the foreign press to cover Papua. Preventing journalists from reporting the facts there is not a good testament on the claim of press freedom in Indonesia.

Jack Hewson … planned visit
to Freeport. Image: Twitter

Hewson, who is based in Jakarta, planned to report on the Freeport issue from Timika in Papua. But after leaving for the Philippines last week, he learned that he has been banned from returning to Indonesia for no clear reason.

It transpires that the request for the ban came from the Indonesian Military (TNI).

According to the Immigration Directorate General, Hewson is suspected of “dangerous activities, endangering security and public order”.

French journalist Cyril Payen is still barred from entering Indonesia following his 2015 documentary film, Indonésie : la guerre oubliée des Papous (The Forgotten War in Papua).

What did Hewson do that was deemed to have endangered security? Was he not simply covering and writing reports about Indonesia like other journalists?

Was it linked with his plan to cover Freeport? Whatever the problem, blacklisting a foreign journalist without a reason or sufficient evidence is a serious violation of press freedom.

Similar bans
Before the Hewson case, there were similar bans on foreign journalists wanting to report on Papua. French journalist Cyril Payen is still barred from entering Indonesia following his 2015 documentary film on France 24, Indonésie: la guerre oubliée des Papous (The Forgotten War in Papua), which detailed human rights violations in Indonesia’s easternmost province.

Two other French journalists, Thomas Dandois and Louise Marie Valentine Bourrat, were jailed for more than two months for covering Wamena while on tourist visas.

The government’s attitude towards foreign journalists damages the claim to press freedom in Indonesia. In the 2016 Press Freedom Index from Reporters Without Borders, Indonesia is ranked 130 out of 180 nations, below Cambodia and Timor-Leste.

Officials from the TNI and the Interior Ministry are too suspicious of foreign journalists. They seem not to understand the function and the role of the press, including the foreign media. Papua has been closed to the outside world for almost a quarter of a century.

Few foreign journalists have been able to travel there. Therefore, it is not surprising that many reporters from around the world want to take a look, especially since there are many problems there, from the Free Papua Movement to the Freeport debacle.

‘Open’ to foreign journalists
In 2015, President Joko Widodo said Papua was open to foreign journalists. Clearly, state institutions and ministries should support the president by facilitating journalists’ access to that region.

Preventing them from going there is inconsistent with the president’s policy.

Protesters outside the Jakarta headquarters of Freeport Indonesia calling for the closure of the giant mine in Papua.
Image: Tempo

The government has no reason to ban foreign reporters because Papua is not a military emergency region. Closing it off from the outside world will only make matters worse.

Rumours and fake reports will spread faster and be more credible if there are no professional journalists who can explain the truth about the province. There is no need for the government to react angrily when foreign journalists report negatively, as long as their reports are factual.

We no longer live in the New Order period, when the mass media was under the full control of the authorities.

The government should understand that negative or positive reports on Papua depends on whether the government can bring about prosperity and justice over there.

Updates on Asia Pacific Report

***
Want to support this work? Donate today
***
Follow us on Twitter & Facebook
***

About the author

Dr David Robie

Professor at AUT University

Dr David Robie is professor of journalism and director of AUT University’s Pacific Media Centre. He is a strong advocate of independent media at the country’s journalism schools. David has published the media transparency blog Café Pacific since 2006. - See More

1 Comment

  1. Mike in Auckland says:

    Where there are resources to plunder, where there is land that can perhaps be used by more resettlement of Malays and other ethnic groups from over populated islands of the Indonesian Archipelago, there is little desire to have reporters raise concerns that the smallish local, native population of West Papua have.

    I bet it is not just the military, but also big business in Indonesia, that has vested interests, and that dislike people reporting on the truth there.

    But with the largest economy of the world now heading back to ripping the shit out of the earth, they may see a good ‘excuse’ to continue with similar short sighted exploitation in Indonesia and West Papua, territory they inherited from the Dutch colonial power.

    Papuans are only a ‘hindrance’ in that endeavour.