On Cassus Belli-aching with Israel

By   /   December 29, 2016  /   10 Comments

TDB recommends Voyager - Unlimited internet @home as fast as you can get

There are many reasons why states may be said to go to war with one another.

screen-shot-2016-12-29-at-7-38-54-am

There are many reasons why states may be said to go to war with one another. 

Sometimes, it is to act on behalf of or in defence of a weaker power against a stronger and more aggressive neighbour. Great Britain’s famous ultimatum to Nazi Germany of early September 1939, that a state of war would exist between them unless the latter withdrew from its illegal occupation of Poland springs immediately to mind as an example. 

On other occasions, a country may go to war to protect or defend perceived international legal norms from violation by an aggressor – Great Britain, again, going to war with Imperial Germany over the violation of Belgian neutrality handily illustrates this principle.

A third head of action – and quite a relevant one for the modern day – is when one state impugns upon the sovereignty of another (an example of which may be the series of causations which lead up to the War of 1812 between Great Britain and the nascent United States of America). 

It is to this third class of Cassus Belli that we now turn.

Imagine there was a state out there who habitually stole the passports of those it nominally professed to call “friends”; and thenused these documents – important, reified embodiments of both the principle and power of sovereignty and state – to carry out illegal acts of state-sponsored terror in other nations.

Is this not a serious and egregious offence against a country?

What about an instance wherein the security-intelligence agents of a state find themselves caught red-handed attempting to interfere with victim-country’s policing and intelligence computersystems, using the cover of the aftermath of a natural disaster in order to gain entry?

Would that not constitute a grave and remarkable violation of sovereignty and the integrity of the victim-country in question?

We probably don’t even need to touch upon the moral dodgyness and iniquity of exploiting predatory sales-practices in order to prey upon the elderly to attempt to raise foreign cash reserves for future nefarious purposes.

All of these things are not hypothetical. They are actual, factual historical elements of the sometimes-strained relationship between New Zealand and Israel.

Two out of three of these would form pretty viable justifications for some sort of armed-and-ready International Incident.

Except, tolerant people that we are, the Kiwi people haven’t exactly insisted upon anything like that.

Even the fairly straight-up abhorrent (by standards of international law and dignity) Passport incident only put a relatively brief damper upon Israeli-NZ relations, and everything was relatively back to normal within the span of about a year.

But despite the fact that we’re pretty easygoing down here, the Israelis aren’t anything like so tolerant.

In recent days, we’ve seen them remove their ambassador from New Zealand, talk of imposing ‘sanctions’ upon us, and then bar our own ambassador to Israel (this last one not being the first time this has happened – on a previous occurrence, they did so because we *dared* to also engage in diplomatic relations with the Palestinian Authority in a way they disapproved of).

Now, we find out that they apparently communicated directly with our representatives to tell us that we have issued a tacit “Declaration of War” against them. This will perhaps be a move of supreme hot-aired bluster, of course – with the Netanyahu administration already seemingly seeking to downplay their leader’s previous (alleged) slip of the tongue. But it nevertheless betrays a fundamental difference of essence – and a weak-spot, for that matter.

New Zealand has historically been quite (perhaps excessively) forgiving of Israeli transgressions upon both our soil and our sovereignty. The Israelis, by contrast, are so harshly vindictive and vituperative precisely because there is one commodity which they vitally depend upon, and which is becoming in increasingly short supply of late. That of international respect, recognition (in a diplomatic sense), and esteem. Just as with Apartheid South Africa (their allies, whom they assisted to attain Nuclear Weapons, let us remember), there is an awareness that diplomatic isolation will eventually, one day, lead to an enforced change of domestic policy at home. The old adage about bullies craving respect as their currency rings true, here, too.

So they rant and they bluster, and even relatively minor movements on the international scale – such as New Zealand using our all-too-brief position on the UN Security Council to endorse a resolution that was broadly in-line with our previously-existing position on an issue … and which was so incredibly UNCONTROVERSIAL that even the United States refused to move to condemn it … well, this apparently constitutes a declaration of war. Surely one of the most serious and somber articulations available in an international relations paradigm, or the illustrious field of statecraft.

Perhaps the Israelis are correct to view this as tantamount to a war-declaration. Maybe it really IS this incredibly significant and serious to them that countries up to and including their formerly omni-abjuring protector in the United States are now starting to rather publicly run out of patience with their occupationist shenanigans. I can certainly, I guess, see why they’re evidently so scared. They might even see this as ‘the beginning of the end’, if we are to get wildly over-hopeful.

But looking at what the Israelis consider to be a ‘legitimate’ grounds for staging an international incident, I can’t help but wonder whether we’ve previously been far too lenient with the Israelis for their own transgressions over the past decade and a half.

Certainly, as suggested via the slew of examples (a handful of which were invoked in the intro) drawn from the history of international engagement, there’d be no shortage of potential justification for New Zealand to enter into a state of confrontation with the state of Israel.

But we haven’t done that.

In no small part because sometimes, that’s what being a grown-up and mature state entails.

Rather than, you know, your Prime Minister calling up another state’s Foreign Minister for the purpose of throwing a temper tantrum down a phone-line.

***
Want to support this work? Donate today
***
Follow us on Twitter & Facebook
***

About the author

Contributor

"Part Apache; Part Swede. Part Attack Helicopter; Part Kitset Furniture."

10 Comments

  1. Afewknowthetruth says:

    Since Jews own and operate most of the international banking system, this is all a storm in a teacup and will soon be forgotten.

    Money and trade trump everything in the modern world. Well, most people still think they do, and it’s what people think that determines the political scene, whether what they think is right or wrong.

    By the way, there are no ‘grown up and mature’ states. If there were, we would not be in the present predicament of living on an overpopulated planet that is undergoing meltdown.

    • CLEANGREEN says:

      We are in decline now Curwen, as the planet cant be pushed over it’s limit, so all these “get rich schemes” these global cabals are now engaged in are swiftly pushing the planet to extension so we all will suffer, and these “Progress kings” will be hiding out in their bunkers living a sustaining life while we all wither.

      That is their end goal it seems now so enjoy the last days.

      We knew when they (Global Corporates) media threw out the environmental stewardship of our planet, we were then entering the last days.

      Why did they close down electric rail services on the main trunk and all the regional rail for dirty truck freight that gobble up tyres at an alarming rate too?

      Obvious isn’t’ it?

      Now the planet is burning up as we speak.

      • Patrick says:

        Will we see another Christmas or will it be all over before then?

      • John W says:

        CG – Yes.
        The planet is in decline because of human folly. We have known it quite clearly for over 45 years .

        No effective changes of course have been allowed to happen because of business interests which still are driving the decline in an accelerated direction, downward.

        So called “Economists” favoured by the private sector, ignore the long term direction of our decline.

        There is no way to reverse the direction because we have allowed business as usual to control our actions and the radical changes necessary long ago have not been allowed. Matter of fact is that the messenger has been demonised and lies have been substituted for science.

        Our future has been traded for short term profit for a minority.
        The marginalised have grown in number, the wealth for a few has grown exponentially and the planet plundered to facilitate this business as usual.

        If you don’t have a picture of the present predicament then you are either in denial, woefully ignorant or complicity with business as usual. You will be a part of the problem.

        In the big picture, the hegemony of Israel is a minor matter but its pervasive and damaging effect connected with the narcissism of its power across the globe needs to be deal to.

        To pay any heed to the Zionists justification to support the inhuman actions and victimisation of Palestinians locally, or the global victims of the banking system; is stupidity.

        As no one can really know how this damaged planet and overshot human population will continue play out/ interact in the near future, certainly a decade will see enormous changes which have already started and will have increasing rate of impact. Collapse may well be underway by then and if not soon after.

        That may well be a factor in the ultra wealthy parasites dramatic accumulation of facility to isolate them selves, but such isolation will not give them protection for long.

        Die off looks likely as food supply dwindles and grain cropping fails with warmer climate. But other factors such as soil erosion, are already showing biting effects. Over cropping and industrialised food production all have a negative effect on long term food supply.

        Dairy will most likely be dropped as a food source as it is too resource hungry, wasteful and damaging to precious environmental resources.

        NZ is not prepared.

  2. J S Bark says:

    All very good Curwen, but you left out providing succour and support to overweight right-wing cetacean bloggers…

    Surely the greatest crime of all?

  3. Stuart Munro says:

    It’ll be interesting to see how the war progresses.

    There isn’t much dairy land in Israel, but there’s plenty of sunny coastal housing sites for Chinese speculators. Clear away Bibi’s rabble and we can solve our housing crisis overnight.

    Install Judith Collins as a puppet ruler and introduce Bill’s ineffectual austerity economics and they’ll look back on Titus’s siege like it was a summer holiday.

  4. Wha Left says:

    If Mr Key says it, it must be true

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/5311491/Investigation-cleared-Israelis-of-spy-claims-PM

    but then again…

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/5319766/Israelis-likely-an-official-covert-team

    and even Mr Wiki Pedia showed mysterious and dodgy dealings with Israelis.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Israel%E2%80%93New_Zealand_passport_scandal

    So the question to ask Mr English at the next press conference is:
    Are the GCSB monitoring Israel, or colluding with them?

    Bill’s an upfront PM guy (unlike the last one we had) and I’m sure he will answer truthfully

  5. Blake says:

    Here is a U.S. vet – Mike Prysner who gives a short speech and speaks out against war – powerful ! ! ! and timely not only about Irag but all the other perpetual wars orchestrated by the elite criminals.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akm3nYN8aG8