Similar Posts

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

6 Comments

    1. Top wont win any Maori seats Trevor TPM will.
      And TPM will also get at least 2% of the party vote maybe more if the judge hurries up and gets rid of the rot and I’m not talking about John T or the current leaders.
      .

  1. Ive thought for years that they have the potential to be NZ’s Teal alliance or a Lib Dem style party, unlike in Australia where the teals had to make a name for themselves, Top already has a name, it’s the party everyone wants in parliament but noone wants to risk a wasted vote on.

    If they ever get into parliament, they would likely hit double digits at the next election and be perpetually the third largest party, they just have to actually get in parliament for people to see them as viable.

    It’s insane they haven’t got a seat deal when they are routinely at 2% which would give them 3 seats and Labour and National could both work with them, so both major parties should sit out somewhere in Auckland Christchurch or Wellington and just get TOP in parliament, it would benefit both major parties.

    They would absolutely steal some of the environmental wing and male wing of the greens, some liberal reformist votes off labour and some liberal blue green and female vote off national.

    There’s no reason for either major party not to gift them a seat.

    However, it’s been ten years and soon to be four elections of TOP talking about a UBI and they still haven’t countered how beneficiaries will fare under it.

    In some elections they’ve said supplemental payments will still exist for beneficiaries which doesn’t make sense if a ubi is to replace msd, mostly they’ve ignored the question outright and shown hostility and arrogance at being asked how the most vulnerable people will fare under their fabled ubi.

    The current leaders discussion on lowering tax rates for beneficiaries who can work still totally skirts around the question of how much more or less someone who can’t work physically or mentally will receive under a ubi

    Until they address this seriously, I want them in parliament but could never vote for them, as I can’t vote for a party whose policies may make the poor and disabled worse off.

    Top’s ubi and it’s supporters always come off as smug upper middle class liberals who don’t give a f*** about the poor and just don’t wanna deal with Winz if they ever loose their job.

    If they fix the confusion around a ubi and retain their upper house and decentralization of power from Wellington policies, land value tax and yes, marijuana reform (because I want the tax revenue) id strongly consider voting top

    1. I support Top and are a member.
      I’m not smug nor upper class and do give a fuck about the poor as I know many of the party members do.
      The UBI has been explained over and over.
      It only works with their full tax reform policy and would take years to implement.
      The party have said for many years the lower incomes and benefices would be better off.
      A leap of faith may be required by the voting public to make our political environment change.
      Its only going to get worse for benefices and the poor if our current two big parties don’t change the same old.

  2. I don’t think this is a real possibility, but it’s nice to dream that TOP might force a UBI into existence.