Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

17 Comments

  1. the press in New Zealand is as weak as piss. full of little dweebs who have never done a days work i n their life and will do anything for a story unless it is against the will and wishes of their right wing masters.

    1. R.P. MCMURPHY – agree with everything except ‘will do anything for a story” – I think it’s more a case of media too lazy and complacent to do anything but sit around waiting for the next corporate, government or marketing right wing press release to pop into their in box and repeat it verbatim.

      The new wave of pointless media is the spinoff types that are faux centre liberal sites but actually are mostly there to fill in advertising and promotion for their business backers and advertisers, mostly developers and marketing promoters with journo’s who themselves are mostly interested in their own self promotion.

      1. Of course he does (Mike hoskings) Burt because too many Kiwi have put this idiot up on a pedestal

  2. Nice piece Martyn. Every political journo should have a copy of Dirty Politics within their reach at all times. The chapter on Mitchell was one of the most disturbing (only trumped by the one on Katherine Rich’s attack on Professor Doug Selman, the anti-liquor professor). The names Mitchell, Lusk, Williams et al should ring alarm bells.

  3. New Zealand mainstream political journalism doesn’t rise above the level of average sports reporting, which is about as high as New Zealand journalism rises

      1. Rosielee: “Nah. The sports reporting is better.”

        I think you’re probably right. I seldom read anything to do with sports, but on the rare occasions when I have, it’s illuminating to notice how much classier the reportage is, when compared to mainstream political journalism here.

  4. Only Natz would have a mercenary on its team! Says a lot about the culture there. And whoever supports Mitchell should hang their heads in shame.

    Not blessed with a pool of talent, the only Natz contender that comes across as a sensible prospect for leader in my opinion is Amy Adams. She seems the only one who is intelligent, reasonably fair and level headed. The best out of a rotten box of apples. But still Natz all the same.

    And now the $11b hole man Steven Joyce has joined the circus! Give me strength!

    1. You are right about the circus and lack of talent. They are all awful but also think Amy Adams could be just as dangerous posing as a centralist but actually just a drip who will just be a public face to the biggest backstabbers in the National party.

  5. Great post +1000 – scary prospect.

    Mark Mitchell is even scarier, with less morals and more dangerous than Judith Collins (is that even possible) , and that itself is truely scary!

  6. I had the impression Slater and Lusk had been hired to offer advice on helping Nash set out on his own, which turned into a major non event, as did their attempts when hired by an ever so mysterious individual with deep pockets (and long term consent issues with the council) to get Bayden Barber in as Mayor this last election in the Hawkes Bay…again, massive fail, despite the 100 electioneering signs..
    My sense is they only ever work for politicians that fit into their overall plan.
    And they appear to have a few clients who should be demanding a refund.
    Heres hoping Mitchell becomes another disappointed customer.

    http://www.newshub.co.nz/nznews/labour-mp-nash-wanted-own-party-2014100822

  7. I saw the interview of Mark Mitchell on Checkpoint recently. Jeezus … Who among the Natz caucus would vote for someone like him? Charisma-free, with, it appears, as much intelligence as a wet pillowslip.

Comments are closed.