Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

5 Comments

  1. The media did notice the social and economic inequality over the dark nine year reign of Natz/Key/English. Couldn’t help but not notice the decline of the social fabric of NZ right before their eyes.

    However, my reckoning is msm would have been advised by Natz/Joyce to turn a blind eye and carry on with the misinformation it has always been delivering for that same period, keeping the masses under the illusion all is well in our fair land!

  2. How the fuck did it get this bad without the mainstream media screaming about this for 9 years?

    My best guess is that the increasing prices and ever lower ownership rates made the majority of the media elite, most of whom are on 6 figure salaries and can afford a house, feel warm and fuzzy (i.e. wealthy, which is a nice feeling I guess). This is equally true for the rest of the home owners also. It’s more or less become this pointless battle of the “haves” vs “have nots”, when in actual fact no one wins that fight over the long term – since it inevitably leads to societal collapse where no one retains much of anything.

  3. To be fair, Radio NZ – John Campbell especially – ran multiple stories of homelessness in the last few years.

    Print media – not so much. To absorbed with click-bait shite such as this; https://thedailyblog.co.nz/2018/02/01/has-anyone-worked-out-what-the-hell-meghan-markle-ever-did-to-kate-hawkesby-yet-wtf-was-that-weird-column-about/

    Or running fake news stories such as the Herald’s Donghua Liu Affair, which destroyed David Cunliffe’s career.

  4. Yeah, where were the media for 9 years? Excellent questions Martyn, that I would like answers to

Comments are closed.