Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

8 Comments

  1. Maybe worth a consideration, as an add on to the time principles will be the need for a conflict resolution service. Especially in the transition from the here and now, to the future as desired.

    All sounds good until you have one dissident with an opposing view of one or more of the time principles.

    Who decide what is the correct way forward? Will democracy live?

    1. I think that beyond your ideas Gerrit we must develop parameters when considering ideas, familiar behaviour, and dissidents. We must on occasions anyway go through a checking process, similar to the one that air pilots used on their instrumentation capability before computerisation took over. With people it would be a mindset check and conform to some requirements such as, what are the values on which this action is based? – 1 Have I delayed speaking for five seconds (to allow my mind to digest the original input), 2 Is mine a reasonable answer in tune with the provoking question etc

      We have made machines that can think like us, and that was an unthought through exercise, as so much of what we do is. So we have to adopt definitely, modes of thinking that anyone in a position of importance will use, and enforced by teaching and hearings about complaints, and refreshing the skill with summer school debates at universities and polytechnics run by the state.

      I have had a fine for pausing and not stopping at a place where I could see it okay and appropriate to go. However the Stop system was brought in to reduce accidents and in general is sensible and good. Applying that thinking to our expressions of cogitation , and to that process also, becomes absolute.

      There must be a time for certainty and seriousness and responsible values, and then a short break when one can listen to Monty Python or some OTT comedians. But our minds are not trained at present, too often strained and not in the way of Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice – we should act out his good lines:
      The quality of mercy is not strained; It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven
      Upon the place beneath. It is twice blest; It blesseth him that gives and him that takes.
      ‘Tis mightiest in the mightiest. It becomes
      The thronèd monarch better than his crown….

  2. Where is bob1st and entrails of comet (comedians)? When the going is tough, the tough get going, some saying – what does that mean Bob1st? I thought you would be right here with Trev and Dilly Ann with your pre-packaged ideas all ready to go and drown us all in platitudes.

  3. Getting discussion started? If there was a capricious comment on an image on captions? Getting acknowledgment of the excitable nature of our brains as well as making ourselves thoughtful perhaps.

    Some links and material relating to the witch trial in Monty Python and the Holy Grail.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kzSaYvyYq0
    Witch Trial Scene 3.46m

    1 https://blog.apaonline.org/2019/06/27/monty-python-witch-trial-validity-soundness-and-the-fallacy-of-the-undistributed-middle/ (Used in studies.)
    2 Another reference to how it came about so there is a reference point.
    ( A point from another link. …’Monty Python is creating their micro version of The Crucible, playwright Arthur Miller’s metaphor for McCarthyism using the Salem witch trials. It’s challenging …’)
    3 Another studying link starts off looking at local fallacies.using the witch trial as an example.
    https://hvrpindianapolis.wordpress.com/2017/03/01/four-irritating-fallacies-monty-python-style/
    (This is good for people like me who have not done study into this previously.)

  4. Hello Wayne I hope you will put up some other posts with less scary headings that we can wrap our brains around. It seems that we need to be awoken by a Prince of Pulchitrude to avoid becoming irrelevant also-rans.

Comments are closed.