Similar Posts

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 Comments

    1. Thanks for that Neo. Its the sort of thing that I don’t want to know, feels like a cup of cold sick.

  1. A bit of news that cropped up on the google presentation. From morningside – a device to be watched and read carefully, I think we have noted it before.
    https://www.morningside.nz/news/an-uninhabited-island-off-new-zealand-could-be-opened-to-the-public-as-early-as-2026/
    The island’s remoteness has protected rare species, but isolation isn’t a complete shield. Climate shifts, invasive threats, and illegal landings still nibble at its safety. Opening the island in a controlled way could add eyes, funding, and pride to its protection.
    There’s a simple idea gaining traction: use smart limits to make access part of the island’s long-term survival, not its undoing. As many rangers say, “Access can either be a risk or a remedy—execution decides.”…

    Another bit of NZAO, hopefully by money-grabbing real estate ferrets, to be wrested from our hands by smart manipulation. Sell it to a grand seigneur who then takes charge of it and carries out DOC requirements for a while – then decides to set up a Jeffrey Epstein for some to resort to, maybe. But there will be a problem say seabirds shitting on the pristine surroundings and wanting to swim in the pool etc. and then…
    This is the age of cynicism and for good reason.