Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

One Comment

  1. “Writing in the latest issue of the ASMS magazine, The Specialist, he says several strategic documents published since 2008 had created an expectation that health services would be clinically-led. These documents include the Health Sector Relationship Agreement between DHBs and health unions, the Time for Quality Agreement between DHBs and ASMS, and the Government’s policy statement on clinical leadership, In Good Hands.”

    And this specific little Action Plan…http://www.acc.co.nz/PRD_EXT_CSMP/groups/external_providers/documents/papers_plans/wpc134157.pdf …supposed to better align services for those living with spinal cord impairment…both ACC and MOH supported.

    I have been trying to get traction on issues raised in the generation of this particular Strategy…and just this morning spent some time guiding someone who desperately needs the kind of wraparound clinical service the SCI Action Plan promises will give better outcomes. By 2014. yeah right.

    I was just saying yesterday that it will require the medical professionals to join together to present a united front to their DHB bosses and the Minister of Health to stop this.

    And maybe the doctors could, instead of turning their heads away, stop and have a conversation with the two quiet protesters at the gala function the other day. You know…the two folk saying that MOH spinal impaired shouldn’t have to beg for the services they need. The same services that ACC funded spinal impaired have direct entry to. We have spoken with a number of specialists who hate the fact that their non ACC spinal injured patients are excluded from so many services and treatments…and yet they are not saying these things in public.

Comments are closed.