Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

4 Comments

  1. ” “Most of those killed in Gaza were women and children with another “Bondi-level” death toll every day – all marked with deathly silence from our government.“

    John many of us don’t recognize this cruel regime in Wellington.

    It does not or will ever speak on behalf of all those ( of which there are many ) who did not cast a vote for any of the three parties that make up this government who ignore the rule of law when it suits their agenda and uses emergency powers to enact anti democratic legislation.

    This cruel cartel support Netanyahu and his polices and actions in Palestine.

    Many of us in New Zealand do not.

    The sadness is the lack of protest in numbers by New Zealanders against this regime that in many ways is far worse than Muldoon in his most ugliest moments.

  2. I think the numbers opposing the regime we have are high, my biggest concern is that Labour will sleep walk in to power. They have a tiny number of members these days, 4000. In the sixties they had 200,000 but they were the party to allow neo-liberal policies to run the show forever as they have done.

  3. The Auckland so-called “Anti-Semitism rally” organised by Juliet Moses was actually a pro-genocide rally. It was a rally demanding that the Jewish State of Israel should not be held to account and that it should be allowed to murder with impunity. The 200 protesters “many wrapped in Israeli flags” walked behind the banner of the genocidal apartheid State of Israel.
    “You get the sense that we love this country and we’re willing to fight for it” Juliet declared.
    What exactly did she mean? Why “this country”? Why not “our country”?
    Because “our country” would have confused her listeners. No one would have been sure whether she was referring to Aotearoa or New Zealand or indeed, Israel. So let us accept that she meant that she loves New Zealand and is “willing to fight for it”. But if Israel was up against Aotearoa, as it has been and still is, for whom would Juliet be “fighting” (in the metaphorical sense)? Not for Aotearoa. For a certainty, she would take the side of Israel. As it is she stands for things that are repugnant to the people of Aotearoa: apartheid, colonialism and genocide.
    Juliet Moses has a choice. She can join the righteous Jews who oppose the work of genocide. If their number is insufficient to avert the wrath of God, then she should go out of Israel, without a backward glance or so much as a hint of regret, in the same spirit that Lot departed the city of Sodom.
    The German people were held to account for the crimes of their Nazi leaders.
    The Japanese people were held responsible for the atrocities of the Empire of Japan.
    Not all Germans and Japanese were guilty, but all were punished, often in horrific ways.
    God told Abraham that he would spare the city of Sodom if a minimum of just five righteous men could be found within its walls. Otherwise, the few innocent ones would perish along with the guilty.
    Collective guilt and collective punishment are the way of the world and a fact of life which comes into play when morality has either failed or been discarded. Israel itself has determined to execute collective punishment. Did it never imagine that the principle would one day rebound upon it?
    The logic of collective guilt will apply to the colonialists of New Zealand and to the population of Israel just as much as to the people of Germany or Japan.
    So Jews should not be complaining about anti-Semitism. They have two choices. Stop the genocide, or dissociate themselves entirely from the Jewish state.

  4. History has proven that allowing antisemitism to flourish unchecked will inevitably end in violence and death.
    The Islamists who murdered Jews at Bondi were the same people who murdered Jews on October 7.
    Not surprising the same apologists active.

Comments are closed.