Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

20 Comments

  1. John Key-“She is a fictional writer. I have great respect for her as a fictional writer”
    Eleanor Catton is a writer of fiction. If she’s a fictional writer then she doesn’t exist.

  2. If Sean Plunkett thinks Catton is a “traitor” because she speaks out against the government, then maybe he thinks we live in a dictatorship.

    Last time I checked a core feature of democracy was the right of citizens to be critical of the government. It’s supposed to be one of those things that differentiates a democracy from a dictatorship. That, and the absence of mass state surveillance.

    I would be curious to know what the right wing in NZ think are the core features of a democracy.

    1. chur I was so tired writing this! Always appreciate peoples corrections when I make a mistake in my blogs Trying to do WAY to much at once atm

  3. As has been pointed out elsewhere (not sure of the exact location) if Sean Plunket sees Eleanor Catton as a traitor for speaking out against
    the government of the day, how does he view his many tirades on National Radio (as an employee of the government of the day) against the then Labour led government? Or is this another right winger (whinger) spouting do as I say not as I do. They are also like this with fraud, it is not okay to defraud the benefit system (even though it may be absolutely necessary for survival of oneself and ones family) but it is entirely okay to defraud the tax system (very rarely necessary) …

  4. “You never change things by fighting against the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing system obsolete.” – Buckminster Fuller.
    As informative as many of the blogs and their responding comments are, inevitably the topic disintegrates into an intellectual debate of Left verse Right. This goes well over my head, and I would suggest, well over the head of the majority of voters. KISS – ultimately, it is the desired outcomes that matter, surely.
    Climate change and its closely related issues of peak oil, peak soil, peak food, extreme inequality, a ‘pyramid’ global financial system that depends on continuous growth that is trashing the environment on this finite planet – these are what matters for the future of societies. Most political parties don’t appear to have any understanding of these issues, let alone policies to address them. While we may not agree with all the Green’s proposals, in the end if we are to survive, the only future is a Green one.
    So I spend little energy on the debate Left v Right, tick the box for Green and then get on with the Transition Town’s solution of building resilient inclusive local communities and hope that NZ voters will eventually wake up. We have to “build for the future, not steal from it”.

  5. Your article is headed – “On Eleanor Catton, the cost of speaking out and why her words have the right running scared,” but you don’t explain why her words have the right running scared, other than to state that Eleanor has “a legitimized power to disrupt the mainstream Medias’ narrative,” which in turn has the right running scared. Your article rambles off on your own critique of neoliberalism (the same as mine by-the-way) but you don’t tie it back into your main argument. Also, you extract fossil fuels but don’t extricate them. B-

    1. pretty sure the truth in general sends the right running scared yo. Not everything I write is perfect and most of what I say has flaws, but Im willing to admit that and continue to learn.

    2. “…you don’t explain why her words have the right running scared, other than to state that Eleanor has “a legitimized power to disrupt the mainstream Medias’ narrative,”
      RAYCH

      Hi Ray, I thnk it is self evident why the Right are running scared. It is in the last part of the quote from Catton which sucinctly skewers these traitors to humanity, with laser like precision as only a good writer could:

      “…They care about short-term gains. They would destroy the planet in order to be able to have the life they want. I feel very angry with my government.”

      As the saying goes: “The truth hurts”. If Eleanour Catton had only said, they are “neo liberal”, “profit obsessed”, “shallow” and “money hungry”, and stopped there, she would have been ignored. This is the sort of work-a-day criticism that the opposition Labour Party make of the government all the time, and it is water off a ducks back.

      If you want to know how exactly accurate Ellenor Catton’s critism of the true nature of our political leaders is, then go to the link below:

      http://motherboard.vice.com/read/so-far-2015-is-pure-dystopia?utm_source=mbfb

      1. So why don’t the opposition Labour Party make the same sort of criticisms of the government that Catton does?

        This is why:

        Labour’s finance spokesman, David Parker, says his party’s policies on oil, gas and mineral extraction are close to those of the Government.

        “I don’t think we are much different from National,” Parker said. “They’ve continued on with the programme that we started in respect to oil and gas,”

        http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10822510

        1. Very good point. It appears some still hold onto the illusion that Labour is a left wing party. Being “in opposition” to a right wing party does not make you left by default, nor does the presence of so-called “left wing” support. The only reason the Labour corpse is still sucking air is the absence of a viable representative alternative.

  6. Reactions tend to either validate or invalidate criticism, even if there’s no reaction at all. I believe it’s patently clear which category the current reaction falls into. It’s one of the drawbacks of jingoism – the mouth quickly opens to approximately the same dimensions as a foot.

Comments are closed.