Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

14 Comments

  1. Posted the above in the wrong thread (obviously should be in the mass surveillance article).

    1. The terms “white trash ” and “feminist” are mutually exclusive. Jane Patterson is definitely NOT feminist.

  2. Why is getting a ‘scalp’ considered a win? I’d like to see a different attitude from MP’s in future as this hasn’t helped to ‘hold the govt to account, nor has it added anything to the running of the country.

  3. Politics is not a game for the thin skinned, or weak of heart, you got to be more like a Vulture with sharp talons and a voracious appetite for rotten flesh, you know like Judith Collins lol

  4. Still remember Jane Patterson’s look of feral glee during a vile question against David Cunliffe during Dirty Politics. Have never liked nor trusted her political incites since.

  5. Judith Collins sympathy whether real or feigned is designed to get a dig at jacind(she should have been relieved of her portfolios two weeks ago). This is the new nemesis they are trying to create ie jacinda is weak. Bridges did it this morning on radio NZ

  6. Sweet Jane Patterson

    That one person Stalag Manager – Jane Patterson – should be invited to quietly leave Radio New Zealand.

    She could run her barbed wire Stalag all by herself without criticism.

    Upon her overdue dismissal, New Zealand Media thankfully, would receive a major rise in prestige.

    Jane is not a Leopard that could hope to change her holocaustic approach.

  7. A comment so widely criticised and more likely to come from Mike Hosking, Duncan Garner, or Leighton Smith

    or Pat Gower, don’t leave that creep out.

  8. Where’s my comment? Left out because I didn’t join the chorus of sympathy? I pointed out that after making the same mistake twice, Claire naively said she’d apologised as if that was enough to get her off the hook. Not for the gnats who attacked her to sting her like gnats do. Both Claire and her leader lacked political nous not to accept she was 2 down and out.

    1. janio, if you can’t even spell Clare’s name right, how many other comments, opinions, nonsense have you got wrong?

      Key pulling hair – please point to where you attacked his right to be in government never mind as prime minister, and I might, just might believe you have an opinion worth listening to. Yeah, technical assault by him as opposed to two forgotten diary listings. Tch, tch.

      It simply points to scrabbling in the bottom of the barrel of venom to get a pin prick score. Oh, just go away you silly little creature.

  9. Great – smoke out yet another biased media personality favouring a rightwing political party, along with all the other media (I hesitate to say it) ‘journalists’ and rabid sociopaths purporting to be the voice of all New Zealanders, but funnily enough loving on Bridges and hating on Ardern, without any real display of investigative reporting whenever they open their gobs or tablets.
    Trouble is, if they’re the only game in town and Labour/NZ First/Greens do not see this as a problem, especially with the once proud, objective institution of Radio New Zealand becoming a nact hothouse, Labour and Co’s road to continue in government becomes an issue.
    Name these pseudo-journalists (thanks Frank) and then we know that every time they make a statement, it is to the advantage of the national/act parties and global moneyed interests, not in our interests.

    As for the income these personalities earn for betraying most New Zealanders’ futures – I’d put them on the living wage; that’s all they deserve. They produce little of real use to our country; instead, they sell us out. That’s the real crime.

    Remember the film Spotlight? That’s real journalism, not the crap that’s being dished up to us now.

    Journalism is no longer a profession with integrity; it has been dragged down by Patterson types. TV3’am’ and ‘The Nation’ are obvious natholes. Sadly, RadioNZ is now owned by greed, not by objective reporting.

    Greed’s roots and tentacles are everywhere. Like Kikuyu grass that uproots concrete, greed uproots people’s lives and breaks up their social cohesion in order to divide and control.

  10. Jum you are right, I misspelt Clare’s name which was rubbish of me. She was not a Cunliffe supporter (she criticised him)so I thought of her as not being on the left of the party and wondered about her capability for jobs like broadcasting & to see through the possibility of creating a genuinely public broadcasting channel. Let’s see what her replacement does. I wanted to write about political issues, not her situation of being under attack. Often you get attacked because those opposing you think you’re dangerous. Not in Clare’s case, she’d made mistakes which made her vulnerable to both gnats & MSM. I was a Labourite who supported Cunliffe like many other members wanting to push the party leftwards.When his wife attacked Robertson for undermining her husband I was aghast that Cunliffe apologised for her. Amazing you think I ever had a good opinion of Key. You carry prejudices like I do.

    1. Janio,

      Thank you for clarifying your earlier message. Perhaps we can move on from that.
      I certainly have my prejudices, perhaps the most important one in political thought is my intolerance towards the professional body of journalism that continues to allow its supposedly objective investigative reporters to show complete bias, often to the point of deliberately misleading the public, by omission, sometimes in order to gain a lucrative career in political PR. (It reminds me of ‘good’ Landlords.inc who are leaping up and down at the unfairness of these new regulations but were happy to see other renters in the most desperate and unhealthy conditions. Perhaps if they had weeded those nasties out by reporting them or prosecuting them privately, regulations now coming into play would probably not have happened.)
      In both cases Journalism and Landlords.inc deserve whatever approbrium they receive.

      My second prejudice is against those that used to be a supporter of one side, yet decamp to the other more conservative business-greed-side, with the extraordinary notion that the new side will be better; it can only be worse. Take Douglas in 80s and the no doubt many voters that then voted for national. Did they seriously think their lives would be any better; instead they got Richardson. Sadly, Douglas showed his true political affiliations too late.

      And like you, I react harder on my favourites when they don’t fulfil my admittedly great expectations, and when nonsense is allowed to delay policy that helps all New Zealanders.
      So perhaps I was the silly little creature this time…

Comments are closed.