Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

10 Comments

  1. Same conflict of interest level as Luxon removing the brightline test and reversing the tax breaks for landlords because he wanted to cash up for when he is given the boot .Same conflict as Costello and the tobacco companies and the list goes on and on .Jesus I had a fellow tell me that Jacinda had a heap of houses and two dairy farms when he was trying to justify what Luxon had done so he could earn a shit load of tax free money .In fact she only ever owned one house that was her family home .

  2. Yes, I agree with the comments about Luxon, but I also think he doesn’t care. He doesn’t care about the appalling tobacco laws and he doesn’t care about the firearms & that crazy Nicole McKee because he just wants to be the Prime Minister. He doesn’t care about policy!!! Just so long as he’s PM!!

    1. There’s an element of that, but I don’t think it’s central to Luxon’s ‘thinking’. He is basically Liz Truss, but with less charisma and not as intelligent. (I mean it).
      He has a hard-right economic agenda of small government, low taxes, privatising government services and lowering the costs faced by business in a number of ways – such as lowering wages by increasing unemployment, reducing compliance costs by slashing environmental, Health & Safety, and employment regulations, and by allowing business to externalise their costs onto Taxpayers (e.g. by deferring action on climate change). What is not clear is whether he truly believes that all this will result in Nirvana for everyone, or just cynically invokes that vision while his real concern is just venally enriching his own social class. Truss was a true believer, which means she is quite mad. Not sure about Luxon though.

    2. The only thing he cares about is getting a knighthood. Like his mate John.
      He’ll have promised Winnie one because that’s what he wants too.
      I suppose poor wee David wouldn’t mind one either, as he retires to count his dosh, having served his purpose in NZ. For Services to the 1%.

      Yes, who can forget poor old John having to reinstate knighthoods himself?

      1. 100% nailed it, Joy.

        Once they have the “sir” in front of their name, they will also enjoy free upgrades from airlines and hotels for the rest of their lives.

        Utterly shameless self interest.

        Meanwhile, shame on us for electing the frickin fuckers.

  3. ” A firearms expert (NZSAS instructor) has told a coronial inquiry into the March 15 terrorist attacks that the offender performed in a “chaotic, unskilled, cumbersome and non-proficient” manner. “. Also labelled the shooter as an amateur.

    He killed 51 and injured dozens more !

    ” Hepi concluded that the terrorist had had some training (at a gun club), however he lacked the fundamental skills, knowledge and experience to be able to operate and handle these weapons, and himself, proficiently.”

    So is McKee with her advocacy for gunclubs and military rifles just wanting to make killers more proficient or is that merely a side issue?

  4. “Needs to engage with stakeholders”. Except the police association. Needs to go and sooner the better.

Comments are closed.