Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

19 Comments

  1. they all make me want to vomit everytime I see them. I refuse to watch their show because it is so ugly. They are like three evil witches in a gingerbread house.

  2. Great stuff Catherine, personally I would never watch the programme, apart from the right wing ex sportsman whose opinions I loathe, we get Garner’s column in the Press and it is inceasingly right wing, but then Duncan has done well out of capitalism and that is probably all he gives a shit about.

    I recently read an interview with Joan Baez one of my heroes. She did an interview with someone in London where he had attempted to grill her on the ‘failure of pacifism. He said the non-violence movement had been a flop, and she replied with ‘Oh, not like violence then? Would you say that’s been a huge success?’.

    I’m with you – we won’t have the debate until people get over the words ‘communism’ and ‘socialism’.

  3. To paraphrase Henry Ford – You can have any economic system you like, as long as its Capitalism.

  4. Duncan’s deliberate(?) anti-intellectualism combined with Mark Richardson’s pro-National rhetoric is more than enough to make me never want to watch it (I wouldn’t even flick to it during ads). Without Paul Henry’s humour to liven up the proceedings there is simply zero point watching it. You can actually feel yourself getting dumbed down, in real-time, when watching either of the mainstream media’s morning TV offerings, but TV3’s is especially worthless and stupid.

  5. I gave up watching these three front-pieces months ago.

    They constantly deride Labour and laud National, conveniently turning their six blind eyes to the utterly appalling record of the last 9 years of National.And forgetting that Labour have only been in the job 5 months. Garner began it on election night when he wanted J Ardern to come out of “hiding” – his words – and answer his questions about her policies. The arrogant sod (why didn’t he listen to her during the election campaign?)

    The whole three of them are so myopic in their narrow, boring views and have thus become so predictable and therefore not worth watching. Anyone who does is wasting precious minutes of their life. Nothing new at all to be learned from them.

    Three closed minds. No surprises there!

    Thank you TDB for bringing some balance like no one else does!

  6. I do not view /listen to Newshub’s Breakfast Show and I am shocked to learn that Amanda Gillies made such an unethical comment.
    I also grew up in Gisborne and certainly hope that I have learned to be
    much less narrow minded.
    Let the debate begin !

  7. they all make me want to vomit everytime I see them. You can have any economic system you like, as long as its Capitalism.

  8. How did public television come to this…?
    Brought out much. Just switch off.

  9. I can’t stand them, the smugness, the unexamined certainty that they are the creme de la creme.
    God knows what the shallow life of TV personality does to a soul , but judging by Gillies, it aint pretty
    I came along to a meeting you held about increased irrigation and protection of unique water qualities in the Sth Island and was so impressed by you.An authentic voice, I realised, this is why I joined the Green Party in the first place
    Wish you were still there Catherine, miss you, but good on you for still speaking out!

  10. Privately owned and rubbish I don’t watch this anymore it is not news it is garbage.

  11. It’s not a conspiracy theory to say the rich and powerful use their unfluence to stifle debate that’s inconvenient to them – it’s just common sense.
    I’m mean, why wouldn’t they use their power that way?

    1. and you also employ the most shallow and vacuous so they wont inadvertently get serious about something

  12. The start of a debate could be to present a structure of a socialist society identifying the necessary decision making processes, and the power hierarchy ; who decides what everyone does, how are these people chosen, how are peoples needs assessed and distributed etc. “Socialism” without any such detailed description / explanation can only conjure up in peoples minds the historical attempts under the name of socialism, namely the Soviet Union and Communist China. Neither worked except by way of vicious dictatorship and a complete lack of personal freedom, and both failed. With their failure improving the outlook for the population in general.
    Rampant lassez faire capitalism isn’t the answer either, but a balance between the two is probably the best compromise with money interests having much less power, and government being much more truly representative of the welfare of the majority. Our democratic system is failing to serve the interests of the majority.
    I would genuinely like to see what the ideal structure of a “socialist” society would be. How it would work. From someone as conversant with the philosophy as you are Catherine. Could you do an article on that?
    I guess you don’t get up to Coro that much now that Esther is in AK.
    Cheers D J S

    1. David clear thinking and honest are needed to examine the best way forward.

      The first step would be to get media ownership out of capitalist hands and remove the gravy train from banks.

      While the media, politicians and public opinion are all controlled by private wealth stolen form society using the capitalist monster, then we will not develop a way out of this mess.

      Capitalism and corruption are genetically entwined.

      1. your first steps are good but they are a necessary fix of the capitalist system rather than a transfer to socialism to my way of thinking.
        But a good start.
        D J S

  13. Makes me want to vomit about what has been discovered at Middlemore Hospital. Not really discovered, Lester Levy and Coleman would have known about the shameful condition of this hospital, where children were in hospital because of damp and mould and the hospital just gave them some more of the same – now that really makes me vomit.

  14. Did you know there’s a big peace march tomorrow in Samoa about the government selling customary land to pay off debt to China.

  15. I don’t watch MSM but I would more if there was something serious to watch. I’m not really turned on by communism but I think modern Capitalism has gone seriously wrong somewhere – there is defiantly room for debate on bigger pictures like ideology and new ideas.

    We are in the 21c and I think what we need is a different approach from both modern capitalism such as the US and UK and modern communism like China.

    I always enjoyed Waatea Fifth Estate and hope it returns! At least we got real news and run by a real commentator who had panels with different views not faux different views like MSM and Fairfax Lite like Spinoff.

    As for focus on trivial, it is defiantly being promoted out there. I vomit when I get FB pics of people’s dinners, coffees or what have you. There is an alternate reality out there all right but it’s fake!

Comments are closed.