Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

11 Comments

  1. What I take from that poll is voters think business as normal and even if they are unhappy they do not see a viable alternative.

    The headlines tell us we have a surplus. Our economy is the envy of others. National have stolen Labours territory with its budget. NZ First and the Greens voted for this budget so that confirms all of the above and the Greens are Labours preferred partner for want of better words. I’m rich because my house worth so much. They know what they are doing with the economy. And who knows what Labour represents?

    That is the sum total of the headlines for voters. No immediate argument from our corporate media who never question National anyhow.

    What I want to see is reality.

    We have a “surplus” because National have cut and frozen budgets, underfunded government departments to the point where there are unofficial sinking lid policies in place on staffing (police, mental health etc) and dysfunction. Some government departments were probably close to insolvency like Solid Energy and even less understandable, Housing NZ and look at the homeless and housing problems in this country.

    If we have such a “Rockstar” economy then why all the austerity?

    Where is Grant Robertson on this? When I here him speak the headline I hear is – yes the economy is going really well, but we can redirect spending better. And if that ain’t a vote for National then what is?

    Labour was slow out of the blocks speaking in plain English to highlight that this budget was a redirection of tax payer money to the wealthy. It was never ever in Labour territory, but I never really heard why until much later and in bits and pieces, long after the ship had sailed.

    Where is the argument against tax cuts? Incrementally smaller government, which is precisely what National are doing, heads us the way of the US and who in their right mind, apart from the multi millionaires that make up and support National, want to go there?

    I know Labour are out there but plain simple reasons why this bullshit budget and Nationals miserable way forward are not the answer and why Labour have a better vision, are needed as soon as possible, like yesterday.

  2. Are National using firms like Strategic Communication Laboratories and offshoots like Cambridge Analytica which provide marketing based on psychological modeling. One of its core focuses: Influencing elections.

    https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/big-data-cambridge-analytica-brexit-trump

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/feb/26/robert-mercer-breitbart-war-on-media-steve-bannon-donald-trump-nigel-farage

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/mar/04/nigel-oakes-cambridge-analytica-what-role-brexit-trump

  3. 49 percent? I doubt that. The Nats have never cracked the 47,48 percent mark.

  4. Labour UK also low in the polls at start of campaign – now look to be doing quite well…thank you.
    Need to be rid of foreign money propping up NZ politics.
    Very anti- democratic!

  5. After watching the Tories implode in the UK against all expectations, my money’s on Winston being right this time.

  6. All the minor party and labour gains imagined here are probably on individually. But they would all have to come together out of the nat vote to all happen at once. That won’t happen, the gains by one will be losses by another on the left. Some inspiration and difference will be needed to change the government.
    D J S

  7. almost 3 years of a possible election campaign wasted, Labour is invisible, inept head in the sand strategy combined with the continued niggle of the NEOs within is continuing to show voters that if they voted Labour they would just get the same version we have had for the last 9 years.

Comments are closed.