Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

9 Comments

  1. I think Bomber has the answer: https://thedailyblog.co.nz/2020/04/18/dear-attorney-general-you-have-to-release-the-covid19-lockdown-advice/
    And in the case of PM Morrison saying; “tracking phones are a matter of national security”, Voltaire would say: :Beware of the words “internal security,”
    for they are the eternal cry of the oppressor.
    I say, PM Jacinda, beware that you are not remember in history as the Prime Minister who took NZ into a POLICE STATE – for once we are in, we will never get out.

    1. Cobaka
      As the former officer in charge of Auckland police Criminal Intelligence section; believe me when I say: Any chance to inflate their importance, extend their powers (and their pay), is an ingredient implanted in recruits as they move through the ranks – Tuhoe- was a classic manifestation of police abuse of Terrorist Powers- until the Solicitor General had to concede the actions of the police had been -UNLAWFUL.

      This is a different scenario but the same mentality lurks in the darkness of security agencies.

  2. It seems your are accurate in your assessment of Australians, Mr. Meurant.
    “Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce says he will refuse to download the official COVID-19 app”
    https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/mps-refuse-to-download-official-covid-19-app-and-demand-privacy-guarantees-20200418-p54l1k.html
    “Politicians are refusing to download the official COVID-19 contact tracing app, while Liberal MPs are demanding data privacy guarantees, as the government tries to convince Australians the software is key to the nation’s coronavirus recovery.”

  3. Kia ora Ross, some people are moaning about losing their democratic rights and freedoms, and that it is all some giant conspiracy to impose some sort of monstrous totalitarian dictatorship.

    When people are worried and stressed, it is sometimes easy to imagine the worst.

    But, New Zealand is still a liberal capitalist democracy.

    We are still having an election at the end of the year.

    Unions haven’t been banned.

    The internet hasn’t been shut down.

    We still have freedom of speech.

    And if we succeed in beating the Covid-19 menace we will be free to move into those “Sunlit uplands” that Winston Churchill spoke of.

    “….and the life of the world may move forward into broad, sunlit uplands.

    But if we fail, then the whole world, including the United States, including all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new dark age…..

    ….Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duties, and so bear ourselves….

    ……for a thousand years, men [women] will still say, “This was their finest hour.”

    Winston Churchill Finest Hour Speech. [amended]

    1. Two points may I address:
      Re Winston Churchill
      Unquestionably lead Britain from defeat at Dunkirk to Victory over Europe
      In spite of the magnificent achievement; before Japan was defeat; so to as Winston.
      Dumped by the voters- who quickly forgot the achievements.
      Re Police State:
      SO its OK if Labour does this?
      Imagine if National had done this?
      What is this?
      As Bomber blogs: Dear Attorney-General – you have to release the Covid19 lockdown advice
      https://thedailyblog.co.nz/2020/04/18/dear-attorney-general-you-have-to-release-the-covid19-lockdown-advice/

      So, it seems I am not alone.

  4. Ill transfer a response I received from a lawyer- pertaining to my blog:

    Parker’s reasoning for non disclosure on the grounds of client/lawyer confidentiality is seriously flawed.
    We, the people of New Zealand, are not conducting litigation against the crown.
    The Government is violating our civil rights which have been secured over centuries. Consider the Magna Carter, the Bill of Rights Act 1688 and numerous Court decisions not to mention wars.
    Transparency on the grounds for removing these hard earned rights, even temporarily, is vital for accountability which requires close scrutiny.
    The public needs to know what has been conceded in the name of this emergency so that it can also scrutinise the restoration as soon as possible.
    Lord Sumption speaks eloquently on this subject on BBC 4 if you haven’t heard him already.
    Where are our champions on this matter? Where is Geoffrey Palmer?Where is the Opposition and all the other civil rights academics?
    Seymour needs support on this matter.

    The above is devoid of the lawyers name – but he/she exists.
    The above is also supportive of Bomber’s plea to Parker.

  5. a good round up of events .

    if america’s lockdown’ objections get to anything like a pro’ gun rally , it’s gonna get a little crazy .
    https://abcnews.go.com/US/authorities-brace-massive-gun-rights-rally-richmond-virginia/story?id=68328504

    international trade is good , it also mean’s the ability to impose sanctions on , any one corrupt , until they comply .
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanctions_against_North_Korea

    it it also forcing , banning on the consumption of dogs / cats in cities of china along with the way they are brutally treated .
    https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/world/2020/04/coronavirus-another-chinese-city-bans-residents-from-eating-dogs-cats.html

    other countries need timber , NZ has it and so can profit .

    mo money mo problems
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUhRKVIjJtw&feature=youtu.be&t=3m03s

  6. THE QUESTION IS? How subservient is the Kiwi generation who must pay the cost of the largess of LOCKDOWN and economic suffocation, which until now- has been accepted by most Kiwis?

    We have to watch authoritarianism. But are we to be forced to be externalities to business interests? This is an unusual one-off event – we can’t return to BAU even if we tried. Let’s not use emotional language about it.

    And interesting about arrest in Germany. I found in a USA Hoover organisation a Policy Review that talked about people wanting change as being ‘domestic terrorists’. Rather alarming to read. I can’t give source just now have to find it.

  7. I correct my comment of Apr.19/20 above – the wording was ‘secular’ not domestic. This was in a paper about terrorism and the background to it and so discusses religious and secular. The excerpt for anyone who is interested was: (I have inserted a paragraph break to add clarity)
    Religious terrorists view violence as an end, not a means to political or economic ends. The secular terrorist views violence as a means to a political end. The religious terrorist sees himself engaging in the destruction of a system, a system that he does not identify with but, rather, is alienated from.

    By contrast, the secular terrorist seeks to renovate the system, not to totally destroy it. For the religious terrorist, the situation calls for no compromise — “Our attitude is dictated by our religious beliefs” — whereas the secular terrorist is utilitarian (violence as a means to an end).
    https://www.hoover.org/research/religion-and-economic-developmentg

Comments are closed.