Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

28 Comments

  1. A man with morals and a strong consience that we have lost within our ruling establishment (National) sadly today.

    Be at peace Karl, we willl miss you.

    1. Tragic story indeed, and totally inappropriate that you choose to score political points by using it.

  2. A sad story indeed.

    What concerns me about this is how there has been a concerted effort to hide the reality of what actually had happened. It wasn’t too long after the initial news reports that the cops clamped right down on talking about what he was doing at Parliament. If I hadn’t heard the first RNZ report where they mentioned that Sid was holding a placard mentioning the Family Court, I would not have known what he was doing. If someone immolates himself outside Parliament are we not allowed to know why?

    I’m no conspiracy junkie but I have been aware of how the Family Court mutes speech and information for quite some time now.

    It is very clear that the system does not work for a large number of parents and yet any attempt to start a conversation on this gets shut down pronto.

    This is a very bad situation…

    1. The reason for the “clampdown” is an agreement between police and media for “suicides” not to be report on in the media in any detail.

      They are most often referred to as simply a death being referred to coroner.

      This was not a attempt at a “cover up”.

    2. I agree, why has anything on this been shut down? I asked to have the media publish my wife and my story and the Judge refused. Why are we not allowed to warn others what they can expect from the court? My wife is also Japanese and has had her life badly damaged by the actions of the family court. They are culturally ignorant and have no idea how important family is to Japanese.

  3. “When you take away everything from a person they will do one of two things, Kill others or Kill Themselves.”

    What a ridiculous and irresponsible sentiment. There is always a third option; if you think those are your only two choices, you are manifestly wrong.

    There is another side to this story and the reason the media isn’t reporting on the content above is because it has the effect of glorifying or martyring someone’s actions.

    This is a grossly irresponsible article. The threshold for denying custody in this country is acually high, and far above mere hearsay. Despite what anecdotes would have you believe.

    1. “Anecdotes”, you mean real, true stories of people who have suffered the effects of Family Court alienation? It wouldn’t glorify or martyr him for the media to talk about it, everyone knows someone set fire to himself, but we are denied the right to know why? You sound very self-righteous and obviously have never dealt with this kind of issue yourself or you wouldn’t be so smug and self-righteous. Tell me what you believe this third option to be? Just accept the injustice and move on?

      1. You can’t trust the accounts of abusive people. They claim to be the victim and they twist the words of actual victims to recast them as abusers. This is why you can’t trust these anecdotes.

        1. One eyed and jumping to conclusions, Nicole. Symptomatic of the problem in a system that marginalises and disempowers men.

          1. I said abusive people, not abusive men. However, it does so happen that most abusers are men. You’re the one jumping to conclusions and inferring gender from my comments.

          2. Erm no, most child abusers are WOMEN. The majority of children are hurt by their MOTHERS. Children, mostly boys, are far more likely to be killed or tortured by their mothers. Fact.

          3. If by fact you must unsubstantiated claim by some random person on the internet, then yes we agree.

  4. So are you just not publishing any comments that are critical of this article? Interesting approach…

  5. Yes that is why I would like to thank Martyn for allowing me to tell his story, as he told me it the day before he died. His photograph was provided to TDB by myself as they were one of the photographs he wanted me to take of him.

    This was a man who felt driven to a course of action because he didn’t feel listed to in a broken system that relies on hearsay, innuendos and assumptions as evidence. After fighting the system for at least 8 years he was driven to this course of action.

    I just hope his story will be told by media with respect and integrity to his truth.

  6. I spoke to this man about shipping a container and contents back to the Czech Republic a couple of months ago and certainly didn’t think he showed any mental health issues but who can tell.

    What a sad story.

  7. Why should silence be maintained because of suicide. I too was very concerned about the lack of news, and thought of a cover up, especially because of the timing. This man made a protest in a way that demanded attention. He paid the ultimate price, and for it not to be covered by the news, is to my mind, disgraceful. I asked Wake up NZ if they could find out anything for me which they did and I thank them. I hope this man’s protest and sacrifice, does not go unheeded by the authorities it was aimed at. Rest in Peace Sid. Thank you Wake Up. To Nicole -your attitude astounds me .

  8. A protest like this should never be ignored. Rest in peace Sid. May your protest not be in vain.

  9. Correction:
    When you take away everything from a person they will NOT normally just Kill others or Kill themselves.
    I agree with Nicole.
    The reasons why this story was covered up is because the media moguls and the (‘new same old” )govt are trying to lobby and pass the suicide bill for a suicide culture.
    A new culture where preventative tragedies like this one are “normalized”.
    The other reason is “he was right that the court system is unjust and unfair”.

  10. I also challenged most political parties on their facebooks on suicide awareness day (a couple of days before this poor guy took his life) to consider the idea that potentially up to 140 fathers, a year, kill themselves due to entanglement in the adversarial ‘family’ court and alienation from their kids.

    Zero response except the gendered division infested ‘greens’ who blocked me and deleted my comments. (Ashamed I voted for them since Values in the 1970’s).

    My figures are based on 2013 official stats overlaid by Mike King’s 3x’s figure as reality due to official figures not counting alcohol and drugs in system nor those auto ‘accidents’! Overlaid by a recent Aussie study that claimed 25% of men who suicide are entangled in the adversarial ‘family’ court and with alienation from there children. For the feminists an Aussie study also claimed the ‘family’ court related suicides were 50 men, 10 women and 7 youth a week.

    The fact that this adversarial government created system is mostly just killing fathers/men means that little notice will be taken let alone actually scrapping such conflict making procedures. Let alone having any national discussion on why it is acceptable for our society to have as routine 50% failure of marriages. Particularly when the outcomes for kids, from broken homes (on average), is more negative than from intact families.

Comments are closed.