Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

20 Comments

  1. Motels for homes ,inflation effecting rents and cost of living, wasted money on ego projects all occurred under Labour .The voters were tired of kindness that saw crime go punished and gangscout of control . That is why Labour lost and based on last night’s TV1 poll they continue to lose

    1. Key: live on the street bro, we don’t care.

      Adern: let’s put you up in a motel, until we can build you a house

      1. Ardern: we are announcing the launch of a discussion group to come back in six months with proposals on building.

      2. Key: live on the street bro, we don’t care.

        Adern: let’s put you up in a motel until National get back in and kicks you back out on the streets, because we need the motels for tourists & don’t have any real solutions.

    2. And what are the current lot doing any differently – yet they poll okay – WTF? The last lot lost because of grudges for the handling of the Covid crisis and the byproducts of this (e.g. inflation) – NOT people living in motels because this happened under Keys watch also. Certainly the incumbants are not short of ego project FFS – e.g. boot camps even though we know they don’t work. So you can take your pathetic argument and shove it!

  2. I have to admit a degree of schadenfreude when it comes to cutting the woke and the fat out of Wellington. These fuckers have been lording over us for the past six years, telling us how to live our lives like the little fascists they are. Now it’s payback time!

    Go David!

    1. Incels tend not to have kids. Indeed, it would be news if he has ever had a root he did not pay for!

  3. Does van Velden have children?

    Remember how the right hated on Helen Clarke for being childless. She was an aunt and did stuff for poor kids.

    Act = anti-child

  4. Vast majority of the school lunch providers were private providers, so if the cost goes from $8 to $3, that is a win win. Whether sushi is woke or not is beside the point. Not all children like sandwiches/fruit/sushi/butter chicken etc etc. But we as a country do not have the luxury to fund all variations. That is parents job.

    The major issue is we have created 100s & 000s of job in the last couple of years out of the thin air, lot of the times they did not add to any productivity. Money was free flowing which created enormous debt, and enormous wastage. The biggest stupidity was keeping the interest rate low for so long, inflating house prices and making all house owners feel richer, and now all must suffer for decisions made by the reserve bank and the last govt.

  5. Let’s talk about the first part of the headline of this post. Slashing more PS roles.
    Historical fact: when NZ had a population of 3.5 million, before 1987, we had 66,000 public servants. That number was halved over the next decade, despite the population growing by half a million.
    We now have 5.3 million of us, yet the number of public servants still remains less than 1987 figures.
    Is there any wonder no government since 1987 has been able to deliver on election promises? Just who do you think is going to implement policy? Computers? Contractors? Consultants? Yeah right!
    Sorry, but like any human enterprise, if you don’t have people to do the work, it doesn’t get done. No amount of wishing, blaming, or whinging will change that fact.
    If you want policy delivered, you have to have people, public servants, to do so. If you want infrastructure, you have to have money – taxes – to deliver it.
    Solution: set by law a requisite number of public servants proportional to the population. Set realistic tax levels to meet policy desires. It’s not rocket science.

    1. The public servants included telecom, railways & ferry, NZ Post, power supply, bnz, etc etc. Hence, you are comparing apples with oranges.

      However, I do agree that govt need to hire more engineers etc, so they don’t have to spend $50m consulting on padestrian bridge.

Comments are closed.