Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

7 Comments

  1. Disproportionate response is not a war crime. If the IDF had killed all of the Hamas fighters that would have just been the consequence of Hamas starting a fight and then losing it.

    Nor is collective punishment of civilians, by destroying their property, ethnic cleansing – that would be not allowing them to return.

    This case went the way it did because of the tough guy pose of Israeli leaders after any attack – which can be seen as incitement (Gallant and Herzog on October 9) and Gallant knowing of no policy for Gaza but his past efforts – Dahiya doctrine. And Natanyahu’s agenda to end HNRWA.

    Hamas would have found Gallant being Defence Minister opportune – a bit like the 9/11 strike designed to provoke an American entry into the ME that would enable an Islamic State.

    Tough guy comments and then Dahiya doctrine war crimes, undermining UNRWA aid delivery and a longer campaign in the past to get Hamas underground – and a ICJ reprise on the fencing policy of 2003 (post intifada).

    1. The definitions are changing to suite. We have to understand that there was people there before the state of Isreal sprung up now we you can’t even recognise what an International Criminal court ruling actually is. We are attempting to destroy secular middle east powers by funding groups like ISIS and radical Islam. Bibi supported Hamas creation it’s all in the ruling. Now the goal is to expell Palestinians and that’s a violation. Just have a cuppa and a lay down my boy.

  2. Are the IDF not permitted to kill terrorists in order to safeguard the Israeli population then Martyn?

Comments are closed.