Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

32 Comments

  1. Nicola states that Grant doesn’t understand that better productivity will lead to trickling down.
    Nicola doesn’t understand that the trickle down theory was debunked a long long time ago.
    Nicola is thick.

    1. Not only has trickling down been rubbished but productivity will not be raised if people feel their country is being sold out from under them.
      Why would we try to be more productive just so that Nicola and Cluxon can sell what remains cheaply, to their foreign mates and wealthy friends. Once.
      She needs to decide whose side she’s on because at the moment, she doesn’t appear to be on the side of ordinary NZders.
      She knows everything and we are all useless.

      If she wants to improve her own credibility, she needs to show some evidence for what she says. So far, it’s just been shrieky head-girl style bullying and bluster.
      Carrots work better than threats, NActWF.

      As a nation, we are sick of the smug and superior National Party telling the bottom 90% that they are ‘bottom feeders’ and don’t deserve consideration.
      How contemptible to speak of your countrymen and women like that.

  2. Instead of damned lies and statistics we need to think: statistics, public, relations and economics. It is lying to claim something which is untrue and also to deny something that is true. It is also a lie to claim something which the claimant does not know to be true. It is a lie even if it later turns out to be true. Public relations distortions depends on lies to be less than obvious.

    1. The only thing likely to “trickle down” is rental income that will remain in News Zealand, if it’s not send it off to overseas absentee landlords so that National can implement their tax cuts policy.

      The same might be said about bank profits.

  3. It’s an admission just to how fucking useless the lying Willis is. Even a blind man can see that.

  4. Thomas No. It’s his oblique way of suggesting that Bennett is Richardson’s secret love child – The hair ! The hair ! and that Nicola needs better upholstery. Everybody likes Grant, that’s a given.

  5. Vomit inducing moment? When Nicola shot daggers at Grant near the end that showed pure hatred.

  6. No, just being a realist. That is, after all, the most likely outcome, and the only one that will stop this country descending into third world status.

  7. Just realistic enough to see that they might win the battle but have lost the war maybe?
    We will find out on the weekend although Team Labour did not do enough to encourage people to support them so personally I have that sick feeling when you know that the incumbents have not been good enough yet the replacements are going to be worse.

    1. Bonnie, I would like to just rephrase something…”Team Labour did not do enough to encourage SOME people to support them so personally I have that sick feeling when.”

      SOME people. Plenty have benefitted from the Labour government though this is never reported on by the media. The question remains, “why is this”? Who owns the media when positive outcomes are not reported?

      1. You are correct we are better off now than we would have been if National had been in charge for the last 6 years. Silly mistakes have made them look inept, I would still like to see National lose though.

    1. Yes, Donna was a welcome change from most of The Press articles. She is probably too wise to be a politician but from what I have read from her she is streets ahead of most of the current crop of MP’s.

    2. I can’t get that link on my screen. I can’t even get it from the google link. Nothing comes over. Nothing else seems ‘broken’. Is The Press being sent to coventry?

  8. Ph is off the hook for Grant when it comes to talking numbers.

    Legacy of to much smirking, to much talking down to voters and very bad spend ing outcomes.

    Was a good sports minster taking over from Dr Death, so credit for that. But Dr Death set a low bar.

    1. I’m glad people are now calling these donations bribes. They definitely are bribes. There is an expectation of some benefit to come or why give them?

      Quite obvious NAct has a huge amount to spend. We have wall to wall blue round here and we are in a very working-class area, 2 Labour electorates next door to each other.

      I know Chippy has been here for a sausage roll but we don’t do gelato round here, so we haven’t seen Cluxon.
      We’re all bottom feeders I guess and not worth a look.

  9. National did a great job of fending off the worst of the GFCCand then the Chch earthquakes. While Labour did some good work with covid the wheels fell of with the return to normal .Since then Labour have handled the Gabrille storm and Auckland
    downpour very badly with many not knowing the outcome of their homes .
    National will be in a better position to handle what is coming than Labour and especially if they have the Greens with them as they will be backing Hamas.

    1. Ha ha, Willis can’t provide figure for what she’s saying now.
      How will she be ‘better placed’ to handle another Gabrielle. Don’t hold your breath Trevor.

    2. Yes Labour should have told mother nature to fuck off yet the underfunded infrastructure by National had nothing to do with how those natural events were worsened. Jesus H Christ Trevor you are truly pathetic!

Comments are closed.